May 20, 2020

Carlos del Junco interview

Carlos del Junco interview

Always looking to push himself in new directions, Carlos has released an eclectic mixture of genres across the range of his albums. But each song is underpinned with his great sounding fusion of blues / jazz harmonica, with a great tone.

Carlos is also known for his overblowing technique, and he shares how to use this to compliment his sound.

Carlos is also a passionate teacher of the harmonica, and is running some Webinars on how to transcribe music to aid learning.

Select the Chapter Markers tab above to select different sections of the podcast (website version only).

https://www.carlosdeljunco.com

Carlos has a teaching website:
https://www.harmonicapractice.com

Carlos has a Webinar coming up on 30/05/20 on using Transcribe! software:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kak3vC5rGI&list=PLnapgL3AuXGqePHifjO-E8YGdDWFjftSb


Some of the equipment Carlos uses:
Echosystem delay pedal by Empress Effects: https://empresseffects.com/products/echosystem
Lone Wolf effects pedals: https://www.lonewolfblues.com

Marble amps:
https://www.marble-amps.com/


Podcast website:
https://www.harmonicahappyhour.com

Donations:
If you want to make a voluntary donation to help support the running costs of the podcast then please use this link (or visit the podcast website link above):
https://paypal.me/harmonicahappyhour?locale.x=en_GB

Spotify Playlist:
Also check out the Spotify Playlist, which contains most of the songs discussed in the podcast:
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5QC6RF2VTfs4iPuasJBqwT?si=M-j3IkiISeefhR7ybm9qIQ

Podcast sponsors:
This podcast is sponsored by SEYDEL harmonicas - visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seydel1847.com  or on Facebook or Instagram at SEYDEL HARMONICAS
and Blows Me Away Productions: http://www.blowsmeaway.com/

Support the show

01:29 - del Junco name and early life

02:42 - What got Carlos first playing harmonica

03:47 - Other instruments played when young

04:07 - First harmonica song that inspired Carlos

05:04 - Studied art at college, major in Sculpture

05:56 - Debut performance at school with Maths teacher

07:13 - Produced music for a touring play

08:21 - Nelly The Mongrel Dog

08:59 - Released first album

10:17 - Overblows and learning from Howard Levy

11:24 - Developing his overblows

17:47 - Chromatic harmonica and half-valved diatonic

20:32 - Carlos’s tone and embouchure

22:26 - Keys of harmonicas used by Carlos

24:06 - Singing

24:20 - Just Your Fool album

25:51 - Heddon Tadpolly Spook song

27:05 - Up And At ‘Em album

28:04 - Blues Mongrel album including Our Man Flint

29:25 - Steady Movin’ album

31:44 - Mongrel Mash album

33:44 - Mojo song delay effect

35:11 - Blues Etc album

36:34 - Hang On album

43:28 - Teaching

43:53 - Webinar on Transcribe!

45:53 - Value of transcribing music

51:03 - Why choose Carlos as a teacher

51:27 - 10 minutes question

52:57 - Harmonica of choice

54:22 - Favourite key of harmonica

54:40 - Amps

56:05 - Effects pedals

58:39 - Impact of amps and effects on tone

59:25 - Mics

01:00:25 - Future plans

WEBVTT

00:00:00.353 --> 00:00:09.153
Hi, Neil Warren here again and welcome to another episode of the Happy Hour Harmonica podcast with more interviews with some of the finest harmonica players around today.

00:00:09.955 --> 00:00:17.272
Be sure to subscribe to the podcast and also check out the Spotify playlist where some of the tracks discussed during the interviews can be heard.

00:00:19.905 --> 00:00:50.770
The Long Wolf Blues Company but each song is underpinned with his great sounding fusion of blues-jazz harmonica with a great tone.

00:00:51.591 --> 00:00:57.557
Carlos is also known for his overblowing technique, and he shares how he uses this to complement his sound.

00:00:58.619 --> 00:01:05.509
Carlos is also a passionate teacher of the harmonica, and is running some webinars on how to transcribe music to aid learning.

00:01:09.754 --> 00:01:09.853
Music

00:01:18.465 --> 00:01:30.498
Hello, Carlos, and welcome to the podcast.

00:01:31.159 --> 00:01:34.864
Hey, Neil.

00:01:48.385 --> 00:01:50.108
It's a stage name all in one, isn't it?

00:01:50.188 --> 00:01:51.471
First of all, it sounds very cool.

00:01:51.512 --> 00:01:53.275
And it's of the reeds, of the harmonica reeds.

00:01:53.375 --> 00:01:54.617
It couldn't work better, really, could it?

00:01:55.299 --> 00:01:56.320
Yeah, why not?

00:01:56.781 --> 00:01:58.084
We're talking about your early life.

00:01:58.103 --> 00:02:02.953
So as you say, though, you're born in Cuba, and then you emigrated to Canada at the age of one.

00:02:03.274 --> 00:02:05.158
And you're around the Toronto area in Canada.

00:02:05.602 --> 00:02:08.546
Yeah, I basically grew up in Toronto all my life.

00:02:08.606 --> 00:02:18.342
And then about 14 years ago, I moved to this just 100 kilometers east of Toronto, still on Lake Ontario in Ontario, to a little town called Port Hope.

00:02:18.883 --> 00:02:24.831
So what was the music scene like when you were growing up around there and your early influences to get you interested in music?

00:02:25.332 --> 00:02:28.657
Oh, Toronto is one of the biggest cities in Canada.

00:02:28.961 --> 00:02:31.487
Tons of musicians, a great blues scene.

00:02:31.527 --> 00:02:37.502
When I first started playing, I guess at the age of 14, it was pretty soon after that.

00:02:37.923 --> 00:02:42.173
When I was 17, I think I took my first lesson with someone, even though I'd already been playing.

00:02:42.193 --> 00:02:45.782
So do you remember what first got you interested in playing the harmonica?

00:02:46.401 --> 00:02:54.237
Yeah, when I was a grade nine or 14, a friend of mine played a little bit of harmonica on a neck rack, you know, while he was playing guitar.

00:02:54.258 --> 00:02:59.128
And I think just the sound of him bending a note, it was like, man, that's such a cool sound.

00:02:59.188 --> 00:03:01.332
I knew I wanted him to do that.

00:03:01.889 --> 00:03:05.353
So as a harmonica on a rack, were you aspiring Bob Dylan at that stage?

00:03:06.894 --> 00:03:09.316
Paul Butterfield was my first influence, I'd say.

00:03:09.576 --> 00:03:16.062
I mean, I like to joke that, you know, it's guys like Neil Young and Bob Dylan that have given the harmonica, the diatonic harmonica, a bad name.

00:03:16.181 --> 00:03:18.163
Brilliant songwriters that they are.

00:03:18.223 --> 00:03:21.467
It's used as an accessory to what they do best, which is writing songs.

00:03:21.526 --> 00:03:30.694
And I mean, and I say that, again, in all humbleness, like to say that, you know, they've helped get the harmonica out into the public ears through mainstream radio.

00:03:30.715 --> 00:03:36.299
But that's the point is that the folks on mainstream radio radio here, uh, They go, harmonica?

00:03:36.459 --> 00:03:38.381
Oh yeah, doesn't Bob Dylan play the harmonica?

00:03:38.401 --> 00:03:46.067
And that's all they're exposed to as opposed to the amazing underground Little Walters and Paul Butterfields and all those people.

00:03:46.427 --> 00:03:50.871
Did you learn any other instruments when you were younger or before you started playing harmonica?

00:03:51.391 --> 00:03:55.474
I lasted for three weeks on the violin when I was eight.

00:03:55.936 --> 00:03:59.118
And then I lasted for six months taking piano when I was 10.

00:03:59.658 --> 00:04:04.203
And then my hair got curly when I was 14 and the harmonica called out to me.

00:04:04.562 --> 00:04:06.284
I never really learned how to read music.

00:04:07.006 --> 00:04:13.752
Was there particularly a song you remember early on, maybe a Paul Butterfield song that really grabs you and you felt, yeah, that's it.

00:04:14.152 --> 00:04:14.954
Harmonica's for me.

00:04:14.973 --> 00:04:14.993
I

00:04:15.735 --> 00:04:29.088
guess, you know, my first kind of record that had a really big impact on me that I was exposed to was my brothers, older brothers had this, the very first Paul Butterfield blues record just called the Paul Butterfield Blues Band.

00:04:29.367 --> 00:04:31.790
The opening cut, Born in Chicago.

00:04:36.065 --> 00:04:45.538
Did you ever see Paul Butterfield play live?

00:04:46.178 --> 00:04:52.807
Only once, and that was at the very end when he wasn't doing too well, like in the last year of his life, unfortunately.

00:04:52.908 --> 00:04:54.230
Have you seen that documentary about him?

00:04:54.670 --> 00:04:55.951
Funny enough, I was just looking at it

00:04:56.072 --> 00:04:58.615
on Amazon Prime last night thinking I must watch it.

00:04:58.755 --> 00:05:03.562
Yeah, it's lovingly put together with some great footage and definitely worth a watch.

00:05:04.322 --> 00:05:10.192
Then you went on to, I believe, majoring arts in college, and you studied sculpture.

00:05:10.913 --> 00:05:12.315
Yeah, I ended up majoring in sculpture.

00:05:12.336 --> 00:05:14.860
I went to this Ontario College of Art.

00:05:15.242 --> 00:05:22.754
Through that whole time, there was a couple of basement bands and a couple of different people I started playing with at the art school who were musicians as well.

00:05:23.255 --> 00:05:26.442
So hand-in-hand, you know, visual arts and music.

00:05:26.754 --> 00:05:31.339
I saw a quote from you saying that music is just a different way of creating textures and shape.

00:05:31.519 --> 00:05:33.581
You know, you really see that link between the two then.

00:05:33.963 --> 00:05:34.923
Yeah, I do.

00:05:35.024 --> 00:05:43.194
You know, for me, you know, sculpture, the sort of three dimensionality and the tactile thing about sculpture as opposed to, you know, painting.

00:05:43.595 --> 00:05:49.721
But if it was just like, you know, pure shape and form, there's something about that sensuality of the tactile.

00:05:49.781 --> 00:05:50.903
And it's for me, music.

00:05:51.303 --> 00:05:55.629
Yeah, I like to think that I'm, you know, sort of sculpting these sounds when I play.

00:05:56.161 --> 00:05:59.107
Okay, so you mentioned that you started playing at the age of 14.

00:05:59.226 --> 00:06:02.151
I believe you debuted at high school with a math teacher.

00:06:02.211 --> 00:06:03.533
That's some student talent now.

00:06:04.115 --> 00:06:08.822
I used to practice in the stairwells, of course, because you have this great echo in the stairwell.

00:06:09.442 --> 00:06:11.466
Anyway, my math teacher heard me practicing one day.

00:06:11.485 --> 00:06:15.872
He was playing a 12-string and we played a couple of Lead Belly songs.

00:06:16.293 --> 00:06:16.975
Yeah, it was fun.

00:06:17.975 --> 00:06:21.302
At what point did you decide to become a professional musician?

00:06:21.793 --> 00:06:34.625
I kind of got a late start considering, you know, I started playing when I was 14 and dabbling in visual arts through my 20s and then sort of let it go away slowly towards the end of my 20s, the whole sculpture thing.

00:06:34.966 --> 00:06:37.769
You know, I ended up selling two-thirds of the things that I made.

00:06:37.788 --> 00:06:38.750
I was pretty good at it.

00:06:39.971 --> 00:06:45.516
You can actually see some photographs of some of them on my website, like on the About page.

00:06:46.117 --> 00:06:49.680
So it was a long roundabout way before I finally got to playing full-time professionally.

00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:55.737
So when I was 31, I had kind of a whole career thing about, oh, I can't.

00:06:56.057 --> 00:07:00.605
My girlfriend at the time was like, oh, you can't make a living as a musician, you know, and I was sort of doubting myself.

00:07:00.685 --> 00:07:03.490
And so I went actually to see a career counselor.

00:07:03.509 --> 00:07:08.137
I was thinking I could put some credits that I had from my art school towards a Bachelor of Arts.

00:07:08.497 --> 00:07:11.862
And I signed up for three courses at university when I was 30.

00:07:12.244 --> 00:07:22.634
Then I got an offer to go on the road for this play, playing music for this play called Dry Lep's How to Move the Cap of Skating, a And one of the characters in the play played harmonica, and there was all these dream sequences.

00:07:22.675 --> 00:07:27.826
So I created all these soundscapes on the harmonica around the characters in the play.

00:07:27.865 --> 00:07:34.341
And we ended up going on the road, and basically I dropped out of the school and sort of never looked back.

00:07:34.420 --> 00:07:36.084
I realized that I wanted to become full-time.

00:07:36.144 --> 00:07:38.589
So I continued working part-time at this place.

00:07:38.786 --> 00:07:45.293
poster shop and it was sort of full-time, part-time work and it gradually became more and more part-time until I was 40.

00:07:45.374 --> 00:07:53.584
So there's a long-winded way of saying it took a long time before, you know, taking the full dive and becoming completely full-time.

00:07:54.264 --> 00:07:59.050
You were playing music, you know, on a sort of part-time basis until that stage.

00:07:59.091 --> 00:08:00.692
Were you in bands and things up until then?

00:08:01.093 --> 00:08:01.774
Yeah, I was.

00:08:01.894 --> 00:08:12.528
Act 20s, I started, there was a band called the Buzz Upshaw Band and we had a house gig playing every weekend for a good two years, and then we did a bunch of other gigs and stuff too.

00:08:12.990 --> 00:08:14.471
There was a saxophone player in the band.

00:08:14.512 --> 00:08:19.819
He taught me a lot about playing horn lines and playing in unison or harmony lines together.

00:08:19.860 --> 00:08:30.797
Another point on your art connection, I see on your website you've got your emblem is the angry-looking dog with the earring and the harmonica in its mouth.

00:08:31.778 --> 00:08:33.541
Yeah, that's Nelly the mongrel dog.

00:08:33.562 --> 00:08:36.065
A fellow that designs pretty much all my...

00:08:36.577 --> 00:08:40.403
CD jackets, certainly from my band CDs.

00:08:40.985 --> 00:08:42.447
Michael Rycraft, he's brilliant.

00:08:42.506 --> 00:08:45.292
And every single CD record is completely different.

00:08:45.711 --> 00:08:47.975
So he created Nellie the mongrel dog on a computer.

00:08:48.035 --> 00:08:54.626
So you've got two different types of bulldog heads, some wolf's teeth, a chihuahua's body, and a lemur's tail.

00:08:55.548 --> 00:08:58.673
It's become my mascot and kind of a logo.

00:08:58.712 --> 00:09:01.977
You released your first album in 93.

00:09:02.519 --> 00:09:07.410
Bill Kinnear was the fellow that I recorded that record with, who was a really interesting player.

00:09:07.671 --> 00:09:09.394
He's a guy, basically local in Ontario.

00:09:09.413 --> 00:09:13.280
He was like almost twice my age, but had only been playing since he was 35.

00:09:13.782 --> 00:09:17.567
And so his playing is really rough and tumble and kind of primitive, but he had such a passion.

00:09:18.129 --> 00:09:18.990
It totally worked.

00:09:19.049 --> 00:09:20.933
So his playing was super simple.

00:09:21.378 --> 00:09:34.438
You know, I was already into trying to learn, you know, different things and different ways of playing, you know, like I'd heard about the diminished scale, you know, and I remember trying to put that in one of the solos that I played with him and it kind of works.

00:09:35.080 --> 00:09:39.167
And he's doing a lot of Mississippi Fred McDowell and stuff, cover tunes.

00:09:39.246 --> 00:09:43.494
And yeah, it was really fun, but it really forced me to, to try to think and play simply.

00:09:43.855 --> 00:09:45.437
Were you overblowing by this stage?

00:09:45.898 --> 00:09:46.278
Yeah.

00:09:46.359 --> 00:09:47.039
Yeah, I was.

00:09:47.059 --> 00:10:17.840
I mean, I think one of the, better solos on the record you know it was in front of a live audience big road blues yeah i'm quite proud of that like that solo i mean you know we were just fooling around and playing in front of a small cafe audience but yes i was already fooling around with overblows And you had lessons with

00:10:17.860 --> 00:10:18.399
Howard Leamy.

00:10:18.419 --> 00:10:20.023
Is that how you got into overblows?

00:10:20.322 --> 00:10:25.650
I already figured out how to do an overblow sort of on my own and fumbled on it.

00:10:25.811 --> 00:10:30.738
And then I heard about Howard and it was like, you know, mind was blown just because he can do what he can do.

00:10:30.758 --> 00:10:35.004
I mean, he's sort of a musician's musician who's not really a blues guy.

00:10:35.024 --> 00:10:39.931
So my interests were, you know, trying to marry that blues sound with what Howard's doing.

00:10:39.971 --> 00:10:44.898
I went and took, I think in 1988, when Howard was still teaching in this...

00:10:45.313 --> 00:10:52.729
kind of music camp in the summer for a week they'd have these different themes in Augusta Heritage Center in Elkins, West Virginia.

00:10:52.948 --> 00:10:57.413
And so you'd go down and there were just 10 students that hang out for a week and be bowing at Howard's feet.

00:10:58.254 --> 00:11:02.216
And he's just talking way over people's heads about stuff about music theory and jazz theory.

00:11:02.457 --> 00:11:04.359
Basically, they were just classes on jazz theory.

00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:05.821
And this is me playing this position.

00:11:05.860 --> 00:11:07.182
This is me playing in this position.

00:11:07.201 --> 00:11:10.465
So I got all these cassettes over four summers.

00:11:10.524 --> 00:11:18.991
Every time I thought I wouldn't go back, I'd always end up going back just because I'd learned more about jazz theory then probably than I had up until that point.

00:11:18.991 --> 00:11:19.472
Yeah.

00:11:19.513 --> 00:11:23.578
So that's my introduction to Howard and sort of trying to put that into my playing.

00:11:23.599 --> 00:11:38.779
The funny thing about playing with overblows when I first started trying to incorporate them into my playing live, I think my playing almost felt like it got worse because you're trying to, it's really demanding to play well with overblows and to make them musical.

00:11:38.820 --> 00:11:42.686
And you got, you know, your harps, it really helps to have harps that are set up.

00:11:43.138 --> 00:11:49.849
Honestly, even though my last few records haven't really been as bluesy, except for the one that I did with Jimmy Bosco.

00:11:49.889 --> 00:11:51.351
We can talk about that in 2016.

00:11:51.731 --> 00:11:58.703
I would love to make another duo record with somebody that's just more straight ahead blues and be an accompanist.

00:11:58.803 --> 00:12:01.388
I love being the accompanist, you know, and just playing.

00:12:01.408 --> 00:12:01.448
In

00:12:02.470 --> 00:12:04.133
my last interview with P.T.

00:12:04.173 --> 00:12:04.614
Gazelle.

00:12:05.057 --> 00:12:12.336
I made the statement where I said, I don't necessarily like the sound of overblows because to me, you know, they don't necessarily sound that great.

00:12:12.355 --> 00:12:16.405
They maybe sound a little bit weak, you know, because if you don't get them right.

00:12:16.426 --> 00:12:20.756
And PT made the great point, which is, well, that's the case if you aren't very good at them.

00:12:20.836 --> 00:12:33.211
If you listen to some players and you mention your name, you know, they don't sound weak, you know, and I think, you know, that is something that really stands out when you're playing, you know, the overblows sound good with you, you know, because they can often sound a little strained, can't they?

00:12:33.270 --> 00:12:35.932
But what is the secret to getting them to

00:12:37.754 --> 00:12:37.955
sound good?

00:12:37.975 --> 00:12:41.357
I'm laughing because practice, practice, practice, practice.

00:12:41.697 --> 00:12:42.759
I'm sort of of the mind.

00:12:42.778 --> 00:12:44.480
I hate repeating myself.

00:12:44.701 --> 00:12:59.634
I mean, I don't want to sound like I'm really critical of other players, but because I'm really self-critical, I, you know, I realize I put it out on other players when I listen to just jazz records, blues records, whatever it is, like it's such few things that really grab my attention.

00:12:59.674 --> 00:13:04.259
And I'm, so I'm really conscious and I'm not putting out the same record all the time.

00:13:04.759 --> 00:13:09.966
But the point is, is that you've got to really practice and practice and practice.

00:13:10.046 --> 00:13:15.991
Like if I'm, so I've been stretching my abilities, just playing things in a bunch of different keys.

00:13:16.432 --> 00:13:21.597
And so if I come up against something really challenging run, I'll just practice it and practice it.

00:13:21.837 --> 00:13:22.658
Everything is context.

00:13:22.698 --> 00:13:53.772
So if you're going to play an overblow okay here's the overblow let's say hole four this is my a flat harmonica so below four and you play the overbolt you know you gotta feel it and how round it is in your mouth the shape of it and be eventually be able to practice it with like any note i have a whole video just called ta ta dynamics and articulating any note whether it's bent unbent and and being able to play it louder quieter without changing the pitch And you gotta be able to do that with overblows as well.

00:13:53.792 --> 00:14:00.898
And then getting into bending them and putting expression.

00:14:04.929 --> 00:14:06.072
And everything is context.

00:14:06.111 --> 00:14:07.453
So it's what's coming into it.

00:14:07.494 --> 00:14:09.557
You got to practice the note above it or below it.

00:14:10.077 --> 00:14:14.283
It's hardest to go from a blow four straight into an overblow four.

00:14:14.303 --> 00:14:15.284
So you got to practice that.

00:14:15.846 --> 00:14:22.375
So it's simply just practicing the adjacent note and giving it context and making it as strong and practicing again, again, again.

00:14:22.416 --> 00:14:26.162
That's the essence of, you know, making your overblow sound good.

00:14:26.562 --> 00:14:27.984
But you've got to start with the foundation.

00:14:28.065 --> 00:14:31.650
And of course, when you first play an overblow, it sounds like you're strangling a chicken.

00:14:32.412 --> 00:14:38.422
I think overblows has kind of become the new thing, I don't know, over the last 10, 20 years in harmonica.

00:14:38.903 --> 00:14:47.898
And talking to quite a few of the guys on this, they're a little bit dismissive of overblows, as some people are, and they think it's a bit of a fad that is unnecessary.

00:14:48.385 --> 00:14:53.336
But listening to your music, you know, it really shows me, you know, that, as you say, you can really use it effectively.

00:14:53.355 --> 00:14:55.441
You know, your overblows do sound great.

00:14:55.461 --> 00:15:04.559
So I think that it's interesting for people listening that, you know, if you get them right, you know, they can be a very effective tool, as obviously you would testify to, yeah?

00:15:04.900 --> 00:15:07.065
Yeah, you know, and again, for me...

00:15:07.618 --> 00:15:09.683
You know, I really use them as passing tones.

00:15:09.783 --> 00:15:11.649
You don't want to hang out on an overblow.

00:15:11.690 --> 00:15:16.344
Like, although on my last recording, there's a couple of things that are super challenging.

00:15:16.403 --> 00:15:18.770
This one song I played called the Stettel Waltz.

00:15:20.856 --> 00:15:21.118
Stettel Waltz.

00:15:31.745 --> 00:15:35.754
And I was playing, it's a minor tune, and I'm playing in, I think, sixth position.

00:15:35.815 --> 00:15:38.581
It would be the equivalent of playing on a key of B on a C harp.

00:15:38.802 --> 00:15:41.628
There's a couple of spaces where I have to hang on an overblow.

00:15:41.668 --> 00:15:49.986
I'm not interested in trying to play in all 12 keys on a song and showcase that and put it on a recording.

00:15:50.047 --> 00:15:50.828
I would never do that.

00:15:51.330 --> 00:15:58.636
I just don't think it sounds that good, honestly, because, you know, why do you want to try to play a blues in the key of F sharp on a C harmonica?

00:15:59.197 --> 00:16:03.140
You know, it's just going to sound forced and it's an unnatural.

00:16:03.822 --> 00:16:14.511
Yeah, it's possible, but to use it with passing tones, it's totally acceptable, but you have to make them, you know, you do have to practice to get them to sound as good as possible.

00:16:15.113 --> 00:16:20.317
So would you say you use overblows reasonably sparingly or does it depend on the song or?

00:16:20.706 --> 00:16:21.613
I do, yeah.

00:16:21.633 --> 00:16:24.052
I mean, you know, I'm sort of a bluesy...

00:16:24.394 --> 00:16:25.504
I'm a guy that plays...

00:16:25.826 --> 00:16:30.889
blues in a jazzy way here and there, you know, and I'm not a super traditional player.

00:16:30.929 --> 00:16:38.677
My whole new series that I'm doing on webinars is sort of, it's called, I'm calling the series, you know, harmonica blues a little outside of the box.

00:16:38.856 --> 00:16:40.339
You know, I'm not Howard Levy.

00:16:40.418 --> 00:16:58.017
I'm not, uh, I'm me, you know, I'm doing what I do, but it's, yeah, just doing something different than your stock, you know, for lack of a better, you know, great that they were both in their own rights, guys like Sonny Boy, Little Walter, each had their own way of playing But they're sort of called traditional players.

00:16:58.376 --> 00:17:00.181
Little Walter actually could get pretty jazzy.

00:17:00.802 --> 00:17:07.817
But again, I start to question how their knowledge of music theory or applying stuff.

00:17:08.317 --> 00:17:13.630
And it just opens up your playing when you take some really basic things and apply them.

00:17:14.498 --> 00:17:14.778
Yeah.

00:17:14.898 --> 00:17:24.494
And again, I think, you know, you're a good maybe segue into playing overblows for people who haven't maybe investigated them because like you say, you use them in a way that fits music very well.

00:17:24.515 --> 00:17:29.201
You're very kind of, you know, that's a bluesy, jazzy bass player and it all sounds great.

00:17:29.261 --> 00:17:38.657
So this kind of perception that, you know, they are very technical or like you say, playing in some weird key on a C harmonica, you know, I think it all just goes away from that when they hear you playing.

00:17:38.945 --> 00:17:42.811
I play a lot of chromatic harmonica as well myself.

00:17:42.852 --> 00:17:45.536
So I've always sort of thought, well, why do I need to play overblaze?

00:17:45.556 --> 00:17:46.718
Because I just play the chromatic.

00:17:47.179 --> 00:17:49.722
But of course, the chromatic has got a very different sound than

00:17:50.282 --> 00:17:51.085
the diatonic.

00:17:51.525 --> 00:17:54.048
It's interesting, the sound of chromatic harmonica.

00:17:54.088 --> 00:17:59.518
From my money, the best chromatic players have a really great understanding of the diatonic.

00:17:59.577 --> 00:18:02.162
So like Stevie Wonder knows how to bend a note.

00:18:02.721 --> 00:18:07.737
And he's probably one of my all-time favorite because he just makes a talk and makes it sound so sweet.

00:18:08.298 --> 00:18:11.207
Whereas like a guy like Toots Tillman, Toots Tillman was Toots Tillman.

00:18:11.228 --> 00:18:14.195
You know, he's like one of the gods of chromatic jazz harmonica.

00:18:14.637 --> 00:18:15.881
I don't really like his sound.

00:18:16.258 --> 00:18:17.741
Another example, Paul DeLay.

00:18:17.781 --> 00:18:21.991
Whenever Paul DeLay played the chromatic, I just went, yeah, I believe that.

00:18:22.092 --> 00:18:22.613
You know what I mean?

00:18:22.634 --> 00:18:24.919
Like, it's just so sweet.

00:18:25.140 --> 00:18:29.590
And again, Paul DeLay is one of my most favorite diatonic players.

00:18:30.251 --> 00:18:34.080
I love those sort of more progressive voices in the diatonic world.

00:18:34.498 --> 00:18:38.444
I talked to PT Gazelle in the last interview, and we talked about half-valved diatonics.

00:18:39.026 --> 00:18:43.673
And then we had a conversation around the comparison between playing half-valved and playing overblows.

00:18:44.013 --> 00:18:51.987
And PT made the important distinction, which is, first of all, you can't do overblows on a half-valved diatonic because it doesn't mechanically work.

00:18:52.567 --> 00:18:57.375
But what you're doing on a half-valved is you're bending the note down, whereas on an overblow, you're bending it up.

00:18:57.777 --> 00:18:58.557
Yeah, yeah.

00:18:58.690 --> 00:19:01.272
Are you familiar with half valve diatonic?

00:19:01.614 --> 00:19:04.217
I'm familiar with PT Gazelles playing in the sound of those things.

00:19:04.616 --> 00:19:05.117
Yes, I am.

00:19:05.157 --> 00:19:05.357
Yeah.

00:19:06.078 --> 00:19:07.621
But it's not something you play yourself, half

00:19:07.882 --> 00:19:07.981
valve.

00:19:08.001 --> 00:19:13.307
No, again, you know, like the whole, to me, it just sounds like a completely different instrument.

00:19:13.367 --> 00:19:15.050
It doesn't sound like a diatonic anymore.

00:19:15.070 --> 00:19:20.616
As soon as you put a valve on a diatonic, yeah, it just completely changes the sound and it sounds more like a chromatic.

00:19:21.178 --> 00:19:28.813
And I just, I prefer the sound of, the freedom of the breath, so to speak, that you get out of a diatonic.

00:19:29.534 --> 00:19:34.261
And the way it sounds is because of the interaction between the two reeds.

00:19:34.883 --> 00:19:36.244
That's very specific, right?

00:19:36.285 --> 00:19:38.509
It's so subjective, right?

00:19:38.528 --> 00:19:44.258
I'm just not a fan as much of the sound of the chromatic harmonica as I am of the diatonic.

00:19:44.358 --> 00:19:48.525
Again, the expression that you get out of the fact that notes...

00:19:49.153 --> 00:19:52.078
interact with each other and bend and twist and torque.

00:19:52.318 --> 00:19:55.203
And, and you just don't get that sound out of a chromatic.

00:19:55.924 --> 00:19:58.469
I mean, I had to assume then that you don't play chromatic harmonica.

00:19:59.330 --> 00:20:11.130
No, I, I, I mean, I have a couple and I, um, on that play that I was talking about dry lips on and move the campus casing that I was playing on, there was one tango I had to learn and my heart was always pounding.

00:20:11.150 --> 00:20:15.557
Cause I, you know, I learned this song note for note on the chromatic and I really not a chromatic player.

00:20:16.001 --> 00:20:20.594
And, you know, the Astro Pialto Tango would come in and then it would fade out.

00:20:20.614 --> 00:20:21.817
It would just be me solo.

00:20:21.876 --> 00:20:25.526
And it might, like, it was always like, oh, I got through that, you know.

00:20:25.566 --> 00:20:27.150
Yeah.

00:20:27.490 --> 00:20:27.892
Pressure.

00:20:28.473 --> 00:20:29.095
Yeah.

00:20:29.215 --> 00:20:29.836
Yeah.

00:20:29.936 --> 00:20:30.398
Oh, man.

00:20:30.439 --> 00:20:30.819
Yeah.

00:20:31.662 --> 00:20:31.741
Yeah.

00:20:46.529 --> 00:20:49.094
Your tone is pretty incredible.

00:20:49.114 --> 00:20:52.077
It's got such a raw sort of sound to it.

00:20:52.097 --> 00:20:53.861
It's almost sort of savage sort of sound.

00:20:53.881 --> 00:20:56.084
You do these kind of dissonant chord bends.

00:20:57.266 --> 00:21:00.329
Can you talk about your tone a little bit and how you get that tone?

00:21:00.851 --> 00:21:01.392
Well, thank you.

00:21:01.692 --> 00:21:07.339
I'm going to make not a stab here because I'm going to say this with all of affection and humor.

00:21:07.560 --> 00:21:19.028
You know, when I was teaching in Throssingen with Joe Felisco and David Barrett and Steve Baker for a few years, I remember Dave Barrett, one day we were walking together and he said, you know, you've got a really good tone for a pucker player.

00:21:19.509 --> 00:21:22.814
And I'm just sort of going in my eyes and my head for a pucker player, right?

00:21:23.335 --> 00:21:27.181
I mean, I like to mix up the tongue blocking and the pucker playing.

00:21:27.781 --> 00:21:29.123
Tongue blocking and pucker playing are both.

00:21:29.243 --> 00:21:32.428
Tongue blocking is essential technique if you're a diatonic player.

00:21:32.448 --> 00:21:33.670
You just, you got to know it.

00:21:33.710 --> 00:21:44.708
So it's getting better and I'll use it without thinking about it to play some of the mid-register notes now, whereas I didn't hardly ever prior.

00:21:44.728 --> 00:21:55.329
That's just a roundabout way of saying that I think you have to work harder and be more conscious about it when you want to develop your tone, just pure tone as a pucker player.

00:21:55.746 --> 00:22:02.073
And so I'm very careful with my students to say, you know, you really got to learn both, but you might find one technique is easier than the other.

00:22:02.113 --> 00:22:09.560
But if you're going to play pucker, man, you got to make it count so we can, so that we don't give puckering a bad name.

00:22:10.021 --> 00:22:10.281
Yeah.

00:22:10.301 --> 00:22:15.387
I mean, there are other times when I, you know, I think, yeah, it could sound better if it was done with a tongue block.

00:22:15.468 --> 00:22:16.909
Absolutely.

00:22:16.969 --> 00:22:24.758
By what you do with, you know, the fact that you have to do it, your mouth to produce a tongue block, it automatically sort of produces a bigger tone.

00:22:25.377 --> 00:22:35.753
It mentions somewhere on your website, I think there's a review saying that on your albums, you do include the keys of harmonicas that you're using on the songs.

00:22:35.874 --> 00:22:37.916
Is that part of the album notes?

00:22:38.798 --> 00:22:39.078
I do.

00:22:39.318 --> 00:22:39.499
Yeah.

00:22:39.519 --> 00:22:44.205
In fact, on all my CDs, especially the band CDs, I do do that.

00:22:44.326 --> 00:22:47.730
In fact, yeah, the key of the harp and the position that I'm playing in.

00:22:48.452 --> 00:22:50.194
But that's not available on your website?

00:22:50.234 --> 00:22:51.676
No, it's not.

00:22:52.038 --> 00:22:52.759
Unfortunately, right.

00:22:52.798 --> 00:22:54.642
And of course, everything is streaming now.

00:22:55.137 --> 00:22:57.661
Just email me, you know, I'll tell

00:22:57.701 --> 00:22:57.800
you.

00:22:57.840 --> 00:22:58.682
Yeah, you'll tell me.

00:22:59.282 --> 00:23:11.458
Coming back then to talking through some of your albums, and you did a couple of early duo albums initially, and then you had your first album with your band, the Blues Mongrels, I think in 1995 with Joshua Fool.

00:23:12.078 --> 00:23:16.023
Yeah, well, I mean, hey, that's one thing I'll just quickly warn folks.

00:23:16.243 --> 00:23:26.200
Like, if you're looking up on the streaming services, you know, my name, because of the way things are listed, and if the front cover of the CD says, So check this out.

00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:29.784
My very first CD, 1995, Carlos Del Junco, Banned.

00:23:30.144 --> 00:23:33.229
So you've got to type in Carlos Del Junco, Banned, to get a hit.

00:23:33.388 --> 00:23:39.297
If you type in only Carlos Del Junco, you might not even see the option for Carlos Del Junco, Banned, until you finish typing it.

00:23:39.436 --> 00:23:40.317
It's really weird.

00:23:40.657 --> 00:23:43.020
And then there's a few CDs that are just Carlos Del Junco.

00:23:43.521 --> 00:23:46.685
And then there's two or three CDs.

00:23:46.786 --> 00:23:48.167
I think there's two.

00:23:48.248 --> 00:23:57.492
The last one and 2011, Mongrel Mash, that one and Hang On are Carlos Del Junco and the Blues Mongrels.

00:23:57.993 --> 00:23:59.516
So anyway, that's just a heads up on that.

00:23:59.997 --> 00:24:03.462
Well, if people look at your website and see the album names, I'll link to that.

00:24:03.522 --> 00:24:05.665
So at least they can go and search the album names as well.

00:24:05.685 --> 00:24:10.493
1995, the Just Your Fools, the first Blues Mongrel album.

00:24:10.513 --> 00:24:14.299
So yeah, maybe talk about that band and how you got that together and what's your vision with that band?

00:24:14.641 --> 00:24:18.046
Well, I mean, it was really just like, okay, I want to get a record out soon.

00:24:18.273 --> 00:24:19.955
I was early to singing.

00:24:19.976 --> 00:24:22.558
I didn't open my mouth to try to sing anything until I was 30.

00:24:22.618 --> 00:24:23.921
I was terrified to try to sing.

00:24:24.421 --> 00:24:26.604
Then I started trying to take singing lessons and stuff.

00:24:27.664 --> 00:24:31.670
My vision on that record, well, it was just a collection of tunes that I was playing at the time.

00:24:31.690 --> 00:24:32.510
They're all cover tunes.

00:24:32.990 --> 00:24:36.234
Kevin Bright had been playing guitar, an amazing guitar player.

00:24:36.935 --> 00:24:44.045
Just a little side note, I think my records are as much his records as they are mine because he has such a strong voice.

00:24:44.184 --> 00:24:49.853
His sense of comping and putting in the right notes and creativity is ridiculous.

00:24:50.653 --> 00:24:57.785
If you ever check out like Big Boy and some of the stuff he does, for instance, on a tune like Junko Partner, what he does on that tune.

00:25:12.367 --> 00:25:16.053
But anyway, my vision is, you know, on that wasn't so much a vision.

00:25:16.073 --> 00:25:17.753
It was just like, okay, I want to get something out here.

00:25:17.815 --> 00:25:21.057
That's my own group of guys have been playing for six months.

00:25:21.117 --> 00:25:29.826
And we went into a bar, a famous bar in Toronto where a lot of bands got their start called Grossman's Tavern and, you know, recorded a couple of nights and I just chose the best tracks.

00:25:30.989 --> 00:25:34.551
I mentioned about how your albums show that kind of evolution of your sound.

00:25:34.573 --> 00:25:37.375
And I think that's a good example because Just Your Fool is the first album with them.

00:25:37.395 --> 00:25:38.215
It's a live album.

00:25:38.256 --> 00:25:38.477
Yeah.

00:25:38.517 --> 00:25:40.838
So, and it's a lot of blues songs on there, isn't there?

00:25:40.878 --> 00:26:01.622
So it's more of a kind of straight ahead, type of blues uh album and then you get to big boy uh in 1998 which has a song called i'm saying this right head on tadpoli spook is that is that right yeah hidden tadpoli spook yeah yeah what sort of music is that song i love that song by the way what sort of what genre is it

00:26:01.953 --> 00:26:06.122
A quick side note, I re-recorded that in 2011, and that version is much better.

00:26:06.142 --> 00:26:06.182
On

00:26:07.023 --> 00:26:07.625
Mongrel Mash,

00:26:07.664 --> 00:26:08.006
that's right.

00:26:08.026 --> 00:26:09.428
Yeah, my playing is just much better.

00:26:09.828 --> 00:26:15.138
When I listen to that 1998 version on the Big Boy CD, it sounds so stiff to me.

00:26:15.440 --> 00:26:19.367
My playing just evolved, and that's why I wanted to re-record it and the whole band arrangement.

00:26:19.387 --> 00:26:42.526
¶¶ I mean, I would stylistically, I'd call that, you know, it's kind of a hybrid of a sort of ska meets jazz meets roots style.

00:26:42.657 --> 00:26:47.263
meets polka, you know, and I always introduced the song that way.

00:26:47.364 --> 00:26:51.990
Like, you know, even a bit of Italian wedding music thrown into the mix, you know, the melody, you know.

00:26:53.090 --> 00:26:54.993
Yeah, right.

00:26:55.054 --> 00:26:59.118
So that actually is the title of an antique fishing lure.

00:26:59.519 --> 00:27:03.344
And it just seemed like it's this quirky name for a quirky song.

00:27:03.484 --> 00:27:04.405
So it just seemed to fit.

00:27:04.961 --> 00:27:09.709
As you then move forward, you're releasing an album every three years or so at this time.

00:27:10.410 --> 00:27:11.791
You had Up and Atom in 2001.

00:27:11.811 --> 00:27:18.982
You had more Latin sort of flavoured songs in here, the Tex-Mex stuff and a bit of Bluegrass even.

00:27:19.123 --> 00:27:20.885
You had the Mariachi song.

00:27:21.226 --> 00:27:25.573
And you also had How High the Moon on there, which is a jazz standard.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:27:35.329 --> 00:27:41.217
up

00:27:41.237 --> 00:28:06.244
and adam was an interesting like i'd say big boy in 1998 was still like 50 50 mix of blues and then up and adam was this hodgepodge mix of mostly instrumental which a lot of my records ended up being that afterwards and i had a producer at the time that was kind of a yeah it was just an interesting mix of records there's a few few cool tunes on that record And then 2005 was Blues Mongrel.

00:28:06.265 --> 00:28:09.169
That was a big popular one because I came out on a small Canadian label.

00:28:09.710 --> 00:28:12.233
And that was kind of like a part two to Big Boy.

00:28:12.253 --> 00:28:16.680
So again, it was a 50-50 mix of more bluesy stuff and instrumentals.

00:28:17.161 --> 00:28:19.865
And that's a very popular record as well.

00:28:19.904 --> 00:28:21.007
Great record.

00:28:21.067 --> 00:28:22.888
And it's got the song Our Man Flint.

00:28:32.738 --> 00:28:42.659
I've always been a fan.

00:28:42.719 --> 00:28:59.982
And when I was 11, I got to see on my birthday, my mom took me out to see in like Flint, which was the second installment of James Coburn sort of tongue in cheek playing, you know, a spy that sort of, spoof on James Bond, but women love him and he's got all these gadgets and he's out to save the world.

00:29:00.704 --> 00:29:05.811
So Jerry Goldsmith, iconic, did tons of soundtracks for different things.

00:29:05.892 --> 00:29:11.140
And this was a very cool melody that he wrote for the original movie called Our Man Flint.

00:29:11.820 --> 00:29:14.204
And I just knew that I wanted to cover it.

00:29:14.744 --> 00:29:17.630
So yeah, it's a kind of a Latin hybrid melody.

00:29:18.018 --> 00:29:19.058
Very atmospheric.

00:29:19.240 --> 00:29:22.282
I think you do those songs very well, these kind of very atmospheric songs.

00:29:22.364 --> 00:29:23.845
It has that about it.

00:29:24.445 --> 00:29:30.693
So yes, Steady Moving, another excellent album, coming in the same sort of vein, I think, as Blues Mongol.

00:29:30.753 --> 00:29:35.640
And again, another song I really love of yours is on there, which is Diddle It.

00:29:43.049 --> 00:29:43.230
Diddle It

00:29:57.250 --> 00:29:58.972
Possibly my favorite song of yours.

00:29:59.173 --> 00:30:00.315
I love that song.

00:30:00.536 --> 00:30:15.019
And then you do the doodle at the end, which is the kind of banjo version, which is kind of a ragged kind of banjo version, which is fantastic again, because it's kind of the same song, but in this very strange, ragged sort of banjo way as well, which is tremendous.

00:30:15.059 --> 00:30:17.084
So yeah, what about that song, those two songs?

00:30:17.664 --> 00:30:22.773
I mean, the original one, Diddle It, is just a little riff, basically, and kind of an elongated...

00:30:23.298 --> 00:30:25.343
12 bar blues so that everything is doubled up.

00:30:25.383 --> 00:30:29.592
So it's a 20 ends up being 24 bars, but it's just a boogie sort of shuffle.

00:30:30.453 --> 00:30:31.395
Um, and it's just a riff.

00:30:31.636 --> 00:30:42.721
I mean, you know, and, but the fact that it hangs, everything hangs twice as long in the form, it kind of gives it a little bit more suspense, if you will, I guess, in terms of meaning to the melody.

00:30:43.266 --> 00:30:45.829
And then you do two solo pieces, I think, don't you?

00:30:45.869 --> 00:30:50.337
Moving Down the River Ride and Amazing Grace, both as solo harmonica pieces on that album.

00:30:52.161 --> 00:30:52.240
I've

00:30:52.340 --> 00:30:52.741
been...

00:30:54.925 --> 00:30:55.507
I've been...

00:30:58.090 --> 00:31:01.036
Cruising down the river ride I've been...

00:31:03.425 --> 00:31:04.926
Yeah, tip of the hat to Sonny Boy.

00:31:04.946 --> 00:31:06.489
You know, I mean, I love those old guys.

00:31:06.528 --> 00:31:14.596
And it's almost like I didn't have as much appreciation for the original sources like Sonny Boy and Little Walters until later in my career.

00:31:14.636 --> 00:31:20.741
Because I mean, I was sort of, I started with Paul Butterfield, who was taking some stuff, let's say, from Little Walter and doing his own thing.

00:31:21.383 --> 00:31:26.748
But yeah, you know, trying to pay respect and do some justice and just as a way of getting better at it.

00:31:27.348 --> 00:31:30.111
You also play, you know, quite a lot of acoustic, don't you?

00:31:30.230 --> 00:31:31.071
Acoustic harmonica.

00:31:31.092 --> 00:31:32.894
And those two songs are good examples of that.

00:31:33.057 --> 00:31:43.409
Steady Movin' is actually mostly an acoustic band record, except for the first four tunes are electric and then the rest are acoustic, either solo or with a band.

00:31:43.449 --> 00:31:43.869
Yeah.

00:31:44.097 --> 00:31:47.280
And then Mongrel Mash, which just came out again three years later.

00:31:47.340 --> 00:31:48.801
You seem to have a three-year cycle.

00:31:49.021 --> 00:31:49.363
Yeah.

00:31:49.383 --> 00:31:50.403
2011.

00:31:51.605 --> 00:31:53.885
So on here, quite a lot of different styles of music.

00:31:53.926 --> 00:31:57.789
I think, again, you definitely went down playing different genres on this album, yeah?

00:31:58.289 --> 00:31:58.750
Yeah.

00:31:58.830 --> 00:32:16.768
So both Steady Movin' and Mongrel Mash probably only had really, I think there was 10 or 11 tunes in each of those records, but there was only like three tunes that I'd call blues tunes on each of those with vocals, and the rest were instrumental But it's also a very fun record, Mongrel Mash.

00:32:16.788 --> 00:32:21.996
It definitely requires a few listens because you take a left turn from one song to the next.

00:32:22.616 --> 00:32:26.222
I resurrected The Field and Mariachi.

00:32:26.242 --> 00:32:44.604
¦and Heat and Tadpoli Spook from earlier recordings because they'd kind of evolved, you know, in terms of the band sound.

00:32:45.364 --> 00:32:46.445
My Favorite Uncle.

00:32:46.486 --> 00:32:48.067
That's an interesting one.

00:32:48.086 --> 00:32:49.888
Again, what genre is that song in?

00:32:50.190 --> 00:32:56.616
Sort of a roots poppy, not exactly ska hybrid, but it's something jazzy.

00:32:56.656 --> 00:33:03.964
There was some song that I heard that was straight up ska of either a Swedish or Norwegian guitar player.

00:33:03.984 --> 00:33:08.409
And I sort of, based the melody and the chord changes loosely on that.

00:33:09.209 --> 00:33:10.631
I can't even remember what it was called.

00:33:10.671 --> 00:33:14.594
And yeah, it just, it just, it is what it is with a quirky.

00:33:14.614 --> 00:33:16.536
I mean, I don't want to give the people the wrong impression.

00:33:16.556 --> 00:33:20.638
I mean, all this is with a kind of a blues kind of root underneath it all, isn't it?

00:33:20.659 --> 00:33:23.582
And your players are kind of very much a bluesy sound to it.

00:33:23.602 --> 00:33:30.048
So yeah, you get these different genres, but still this kind of great toned harmonica coming through it, which is great.

00:33:30.567 --> 00:33:43.221
The opening cut has a really crazy head on it, you know, but essentially it's It's a 12-bar blues, but the melody is this kind of like falling down the stairs, you know, like tripping down the stairs gracefully, as someone put it.

00:33:43.240 --> 00:33:43.260
I

00:33:43.801 --> 00:33:47.045
was going to ask you about Mojo, which you've got on the Mongrel Mash album.

00:33:47.085 --> 00:33:49.087
So, you know, a great version of Mojo.

00:33:49.127 --> 00:33:52.811
We've heard Mojo obviously lots and lots of times, but, you know, you breathe new life into it.

00:33:53.132 --> 00:33:56.596
But you do this effect at the end of your solo.

00:33:56.715 --> 00:34:00.059
Is it a unison effect that you're doing, or are you using some sort of effect pedal?

00:34:01.741 --> 00:34:01.821
Yeah.

00:34:06.594 --> 00:34:20.177
If you check out the guitar solo on big boy.

00:34:20.641 --> 00:34:23.606
that I actually mentioned it earlier, Junko Partner.

00:34:24.208 --> 00:34:25.789
Kevin Bright does this guitar solo.

00:34:25.829 --> 00:34:29.876
And then the second chorus of the solo, he has a delay pedal, basically.

00:34:29.916 --> 00:34:31.398
And I learned it from him, this trick.

00:34:31.840 --> 00:34:44.936
And it's basically, you have to have a tap tempo delay pedal that samples You get just one repeat only, and you make sure that the volume of the repeat is the same as the note that you play.

00:34:45.416 --> 00:34:47.378
But you set it to a dotted eight pattern.

00:34:47.579 --> 00:34:48.481
So here's what happens.

00:34:48.942 --> 00:34:52.306
Without having the delay pedal to demonstrate, I'm simply playing this.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:34:57.634 --> 00:35:00.860
I'm just playing these thirds going up the dominant seventh scale.

00:35:01.282 --> 00:35:02.985
But what it sounds like is this.

00:35:06.092 --> 00:35:06.733
It

00:35:06.893 --> 00:35:08.778
fills in the holes and it's sort of cheating.

00:35:09.239 --> 00:35:10.302
It's very effective though.

00:35:10.818 --> 00:35:12.940
And then, yeah, just finishing off, talking through your albums.

00:35:13.360 --> 00:35:18.708
So you did have another duo album in 2017, which is Blues Etc., which you mentioned earlier on.

00:35:19.849 --> 00:35:20.931
With Jimmy Bosco.

00:35:21.231 --> 00:35:23.074
Jimmy Bosco is a young phenom.

00:35:23.114 --> 00:35:24.456
He was 14.

00:35:24.856 --> 00:35:25.777
Well, he's half my age.

00:35:26.438 --> 00:35:29.543
I mean, I'm 62, and so I think he's pushing almost 30 now.

00:35:29.643 --> 00:35:38.894
But he was 14 when he released his second CD and got nominated for Canada's equivalent of a Grammy.

00:35:39.076 --> 00:35:40.518
We call them Junos here.

00:35:40.865 --> 00:35:42.208
In the blues department.

00:35:42.449 --> 00:35:45.693
And he got nominated for a blues Juno when he was 14.

00:35:46.054 --> 00:35:47.797
So he moved to my little town.

00:35:47.838 --> 00:35:50.802
He actually grew up just north of this little town, Port Hope, where I'm living now.

00:35:51.664 --> 00:35:53.045
And he's now living in Port Hope.

00:35:53.567 --> 00:35:56.831
And we just got together and started playing some and thought, let's make a record.

00:35:57.012 --> 00:35:57.713
And that's the result.

00:35:58.235 --> 00:36:00.297
So five originals and five cover tunes.

00:36:00.679 --> 00:36:07.009
And, you know, a couple of the originals are sort of a bit kind of rootsy Americana, but it's mostly straight up blues.

00:36:07.585 --> 00:36:09.889
And he sings on, he does most of the singing on it.

00:36:09.989 --> 00:36:11.630
I'm actually really proud of that record.

00:36:11.650 --> 00:36:15.856
I mean, it's, again, you know, my first love, believe it or not, is as a blues player.

00:36:15.996 --> 00:36:18.358
And there's tons of cool stuff on that record, I think.

00:36:33.282 --> 00:36:36.159
And then your most recent album is Hang On in 2018.

00:36:36.179 --> 00:36:40.061
So I think seven years since you'd done a Mongols band album.

00:36:40.514 --> 00:36:40.974
Yeah.

00:36:41.715 --> 00:36:44.998
A couple of things, just some big shifts in my personal life and stuff.

00:36:45.038 --> 00:36:55.467
So I was sort of getting over some heartbreak back in 2011 when that record came out and I was just sort of reassessing things in my life at the time.

00:36:55.487 --> 00:37:00.630
So I was happy to do that record with Jimmy in 2016 and 2018, Hang On came out.

00:37:00.911 --> 00:37:03.574
And that's part of the reason for just the time delay.

00:37:03.614 --> 00:37:15.262
But I'm also, you know, being so self-critical of my own playing, I'm hyper aware of other more traditionally you know, harp players or anybody just sort of putting the same record out again and again and again.

00:37:15.302 --> 00:37:17.382
And I go, Oh, I don't want to do that.

00:37:17.483 --> 00:37:30.393
You know, I want to do something that's kind of a little bit different and then maybe come back and do another straight up blues record, but maybe with someone who's doing more of the singing or something that's just, so I'm really conscious of just not wanting to make the same record over and again.

00:37:30.454 --> 00:37:33.876
So the new one is again, not as bluesy.

00:37:34.038 --> 00:37:36.139
There's probably only three bluesy things on it.

00:37:36.599 --> 00:37:42.284
And it's definitely more of a quiet record because it's only featuring the trio and the guitar player, Eric St.

00:37:42.324 --> 00:37:46.750
Laurent, who's a brilliant guitar player, um, in his own right and with a his own band.

00:37:46.789 --> 00:37:54.931
We've been touring since 2007, so I thought it's finally time to get him on the record because I'd always put Kevin Bright on all my recordings.

00:37:55.492 --> 00:38:03.570
And so the tunes are, again, this time it's 50-50 vocals and 50% instrumentals.

00:38:03.650 --> 00:38:10.338
And the instrumentals tend to be a little bit quieter and more brooding, but beautiful, beautiful melodies.

00:38:11.079 --> 00:38:12.840
There's a John Zorn song on there.

00:38:13.561 --> 00:38:19.648
John Zorn is known for his kind of completely abstract, angular, weird, improvising tunes.

00:38:20.208 --> 00:38:28.438
But this particular melody is this gorgeous tune that sort of bounces between 5-4, 6-4, and 4-4 called The Rain Horse.

00:38:28.994 --> 00:38:44.436
Then another one written by a local...

00:38:44.737 --> 00:38:47.282
piano player called Aaron Davis.

00:38:47.322 --> 00:38:51.188
He wrote the song I mentioned called The Studdle Waltz, where I'm playing in sixth position.

00:38:51.668 --> 00:38:56.715
I think I read another quote, an eclectic potpourri of styles sums it up well.

00:38:56.735 --> 00:38:57.717
There's a lot of different styles.

00:38:57.737 --> 00:38:58.699
It's a really nice record.

00:38:58.918 --> 00:39:03.025
Yeah, and also that's another thing I'm really aware of, you know, and I listen to a lot of jazz records.

00:39:03.085 --> 00:39:15.628
Okay, so there's some jazzier things in this record, but there's sort of I'm not a fan of really long blue solos or really long jazz solos, unless they're really telling a story and something's building and it's really evolving.

00:39:15.949 --> 00:39:17.751
I just sort of go like, what's the point?

00:39:18.271 --> 00:39:21.257
So I'm really aware of doing things that, yeah, a little bit more range.

00:39:21.297 --> 00:39:26.458
Like when I recorded three courses of a solo, over Little Wing.

00:39:26.478 --> 00:39:28.001
I'm actually really proud of that solo.

00:39:28.822 --> 00:39:32.585
It's one of the few, only one of the two tunes that has amplified harp on it.

00:39:33.005 --> 00:39:35.648
And so I was trying to play tribute when I mixed that record.

00:39:35.688 --> 00:39:39.952
The last two records I've mixed myself and I would have mastered the last one, except I ran out of time.

00:39:40.052 --> 00:39:43.856
I mastered the one I did with Jimmy Bosco and mixed it, recorded it in my living room.

00:39:44.177 --> 00:39:46.840
You know, I sort of figure out a solo that works.

00:39:47.739 --> 00:39:50.943
I just keep playing around with ideas so that it tells a story.

00:39:51.023 --> 00:39:53.306
That solo really tells a story.

00:39:53.505 --> 00:39:54.367
I think, anyway.

00:39:54.768 --> 00:39:55.809
That's an interesting concept.

00:39:55.829 --> 00:39:58.873
And you often hear that said, you know, I'm trying to tell a story in my music.

00:39:58.932 --> 00:40:04.000
And I think a lot of people who are trying to improvise, you know, that's something that, you know, they may be, you know, they're struggling.

00:40:04.181 --> 00:40:05.902
What do I do with my improvisation?

00:40:06.023 --> 00:40:09.989
So when you say you're trying to tell a story, what's your thinking when you're trying to put that together?

00:40:10.590 --> 00:40:11.230
I'm of the mind.

00:40:11.291 --> 00:40:19.581
I mean, I'll just confess that a lot of the tunes, especially the tunes that have a lot of chord changes, which Little Wing does, it's certainly not a blues tune.

00:40:19.777 --> 00:40:23.762
you know, it's considered sort of a rock ballad, I guess, and it's an odd 19-bar form.

00:40:24.364 --> 00:40:31.072
I just kept playing with it and playing with it and ideas and then eventually sort of strung a bunch of stuff and worked out a solo for that tune.

00:40:31.474 --> 00:40:40.465
And so when I play that tune live, I pretty much sort of more or less, you know, with variations thereof, but I'm playing that shape of the solo.

00:40:48.898 --> 00:40:49.117
piano plays

00:41:00.961 --> 00:41:08.014
Are some of your solos quite prearranged from the point of view that you're trying to, as you say, develop them in that way?

00:41:08.074 --> 00:41:08.275
Yeah,

00:41:08.896 --> 00:41:10.398
the jazz, your tunes, absolutely.

00:41:10.998 --> 00:41:19.614
When I'm recording them, doing overdubs, because they're not live off the floor in this case, yeah, I'm just playing with ideas until something sort of works properly.

00:41:19.713 --> 00:41:23.960
I wish I had the chops as a jazz player just to go, hey, oh yeah, here's something.

00:41:24.019 --> 00:41:24.802
And it totally works.

00:41:24.902 --> 00:41:25.782
I don't.

00:41:26.264 --> 00:41:28.427
If it's going to go on a recording, man, I want it to sound good.

00:41:28.646 --> 00:41:32.512
And I don't think it sounds like, oh, Carlos is playing an O-dub.

00:41:32.592 --> 00:41:34.215
I'm very also critical of that.

00:41:34.315 --> 00:41:35.016
It's got to sound.

00:41:35.077 --> 00:41:38.021
There's got to be something that's organic sounding, right?

00:41:38.081 --> 00:41:38.302
Yeah.

00:41:38.626 --> 00:41:44.161
And Little Wing, you mentioned there, it was quite a brave song to include us, specifically with the harmonica solo.

00:41:44.240 --> 00:41:47.710
I mean, it's kind of like one of the classic rock songs of all time.

00:41:47.750 --> 00:41:50.237
So to take that one was quite brave.

00:41:50.818 --> 00:41:51.418
Yeah.

00:41:51.498 --> 00:42:00.795
You know, and, you know, I was honestly like when I was singing that tune, it was like, oh man, you know, this is, I'm out of my element, you know, like a part of me, but I think, you know, it's not horrible.

00:42:00.835 --> 00:42:01.637
It's fine.

00:42:02.277 --> 00:42:16.262
You know, and I remember mixing it, trying to give it, you know, some sparkle, like the way putting in subtle chorusing effect on the voice and, and the harp too, and panning, panning delays and stuff like that, just to sort of pay homage to the sort of late sixties psychedelic.

00:42:16.641 --> 00:42:19.686
And the other song I really like on there is what, well, there's quite a few.

00:42:19.706 --> 00:42:25.032
I like the Alberta Blues, which is a kind of nice, kind of almost like a folky tune sort of song, isn't it?

00:42:25.211 --> 00:42:31.539
And then the Ribbon of Darkness, again, is another one, I think, where you get a lot of kind of atmosphere into the song.

00:42:32.141 --> 00:42:35.364
It's a ribbon of darkness over me.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:42:51.010 --> 00:43:01.844
Yeah, I mean, that's written by the iconic Gordon Lightfoot, sort of a Canadian singer-songwriter of singer-songwriters, kind of like a Canadian Bob Dylan, if you will, but very different.

00:43:02.344 --> 00:43:04.809
And that was one of his first big hits he did in 65.

00:43:05.329 --> 00:43:08.773
And it's a completely different version than his version.

00:43:10.175 --> 00:43:13.940
His version is almost happy and whistling, and yet the lyrics are really dark.

00:43:14.621 --> 00:43:20.572
And so a friend of mine, Rick Fiennes, recorded a version And I sort of took his version and sped it up a little bit.

00:43:20.733 --> 00:43:21.697
And it's still really slow.

00:43:21.717 --> 00:43:27.481
And then use this descending chord sequence to sort of play vamp on a solo towards the end.

00:43:27.969 --> 00:43:31.233
I know you're very much interested in teaching.

00:43:31.253 --> 00:43:33.795
You've got your website at harmonicopractice.com.

00:43:33.815 --> 00:43:36.356
I'll put a link to that onto the podcast notes.

00:43:37.057 --> 00:43:37.418
Sure, yeah.

00:43:37.478 --> 00:43:39.940
I think I got that up about three or four years ago.

00:43:40.000 --> 00:43:44.103
Did a few minor tweaks just recently because I'm starting to do webinars.

00:43:44.143 --> 00:43:47.266
So there's a webinar purchase page.

00:43:47.746 --> 00:43:49.608
I love teaching, I got to say.

00:43:49.728 --> 00:43:54.273
So, I mean, you know, I have quite a few students, single students that I teach on Skype or Zoom.

00:43:54.572 --> 00:44:05.164
But the webinar forum is a way to get a lot of people involved just through a chat box and to ask questions and it becomes more like a kind of a presentation and then they can ask questions about what you're doing.

00:44:06.065 --> 00:44:18.860
For this particular webinar that I'm doing on May the 30th about transcribing the memory, there's tons of class materials too, like PDFs to download, which talk about what I'm going to be playing and talking about how to think about transcribing well.

00:44:19.340 --> 00:44:20.842
Yeah, so I'm really enjoying doing that.

00:44:21.443 --> 00:44:27.000
The webinar that you're running on May the 30th, Can that be found through the harmonicpractice.com website?

00:44:27.420 --> 00:44:28.121
Yeah, it's there.

00:44:28.141 --> 00:44:32.565
There's a link that says purchase webinars and it's there with webinar one.

00:44:32.605 --> 00:44:36.088
So the video recording and the audio.

00:44:36.168 --> 00:44:39.471
I actually also, I'm a big audiophile since I'm recording my own stuff.

00:44:39.490 --> 00:44:42.494
So I also record my own audio file.

00:44:43.153 --> 00:44:55.887
I record my own version of the audio and that's really useful when it comes to, you know, the best way that you're going to make use of the lesson is it's one thing to sit there for two hours and watch the webinars But it's another thing to actually do the work.

00:44:56.329 --> 00:45:00.338
The best thing you could do is to load it up into this program called Transcribe.

00:45:00.800 --> 00:45:01.961
Nothing else like it.

00:45:02.023 --> 00:45:04.628
Like I swear to God, I've tried a bunch of different ones.

00:45:04.668 --> 00:45:07.996
And this one is, it's simply called Transcribe with an exclamation mark.

00:45:08.498 --> 00:45:10.141
And it's basically a glorified word.

00:45:10.338 --> 00:45:42.166
mp3 player you can put any type of audio file in there you can even load up videos um and then you see the audio spectrum you can mark it up uh put little markers which you can snap to with your key command and you slow you can slow the audio down you can change the key you can write notes to yourself about what someone's talking or you can write lyrics to songs or whatever it just kind of streamlines your process of learning if you have a two-hour lecture you know you load it up you can quickly reference that at 200 speed 200 like just like you can on youtube you You know how you can play things faster if you want to get through them?

00:45:42.507 --> 00:45:46.652
You can do that just to quickly get through the material and then mark up the things that are important.

00:45:46.692 --> 00:45:50.456
And then you go back and, okay, today I'm going to work on this pentatonic scale or whatever.

00:45:50.476 --> 00:45:51.639
And you slow it down.

00:45:52.119 --> 00:45:52.579
It's amazing.

00:45:52.981 --> 00:45:55.364
We were just talking about transcribing for a moment.

00:45:55.423 --> 00:45:59.068
Maybe people who haven't done a lot of transcribing, you know, what you see the value of transcribing.

00:45:59.108 --> 00:46:03.014
Well, anyone who wants to learn how to play...

00:46:03.521 --> 00:46:18.911
Any instrument, doesn't matter whether it's harmonic or whatever it is, like if you're especially in the blues and the jazz realm and you want to learn about improvising, one of the best ways to learn your vocabulary is to really absorb the people that you love.

00:46:19.291 --> 00:46:23.518
It's not the same when someone gives you a piece of tablature and says, oh, here's the solo by Sonny Boy.

00:46:23.539 --> 00:46:24.882
It tells you nothing.

00:46:25.217 --> 00:46:36.106
Even though some of the riffs he's playing are reasonably straight ahead, it tells you absolutely nothing about the subtlety and nuance of the way he pushes and pulls the rhythm, even though the riff might be really simple.

00:46:36.347 --> 00:46:41.771
It tells you nothing about the tone, the way he's playing the vibrato, the way he's using his hands.

00:46:41.871 --> 00:46:42.932
It's all that stuff.

00:46:43.313 --> 00:46:59.027
And so whether it's a sax player, a guitar player, a piano player, all that way that the language, the way something's communicated, it's you sitting down as the person learning your instrument and sitting down and completely immersing yourself intimately with that player step by step, riff by riff.

00:46:59.327 --> 00:47:01.891
I mean, it's been, you can tell I'm really passionate about this.

00:47:01.951 --> 00:47:04.574
It's just, I can't stress how important it is.

00:47:05.094 --> 00:47:06.036
Everyone should be able to do this.

00:47:06.416 --> 00:47:08.338
Seriously, put the tablature away.

00:47:08.378 --> 00:47:13.023
You're missing so much of the process of figuring this stuff out for yourself.

00:47:13.143 --> 00:47:16.106
And it's literally as easy as getting from one note to the next.

00:47:16.186 --> 00:47:18.969
If you can do that, you can hear the difference of one note to the next.

00:47:19.429 --> 00:47:22.112
You get from the next note to the next note and then to the next note.

00:47:22.213 --> 00:47:23.735
And you go, well, I can't hear that interval.

00:47:24.355 --> 00:47:30.289
And so this way webinar I'm doing on May the 30th is very much about how to listen well, how to think about listening.

00:47:30.429 --> 00:47:34.601
It's patient work at the beginning, but the more you do it, it starts to go really fast.

00:47:35.137 --> 00:47:36.039
But I think you're right.

00:47:36.119 --> 00:47:44.710
I think in this age now of YouTube videos, you know, intuition videos, I think a lot of people have this kind of expectation that they can be spoon-fed everything.

00:47:44.750 --> 00:47:48.835
You know, I need to go and look at YouTube and have this person tell me how I play this.

00:47:49.135 --> 00:47:51.818
But going and doing it yourself is just another level.

00:47:52.260 --> 00:47:58.768
It's useful to have a teacher to give you some pointers, particularly earlier on, of course, but it's almost like working it out yourself.

00:47:59.108 --> 00:48:00.409
You get a lot more out of it, don't you?

00:48:00.833 --> 00:48:01.414
Absolutely.

00:48:01.454 --> 00:48:08.481
There's the old saying, and I say this on the promotional video, everything you need to know is in your record collection or on those MP3s.

00:48:08.983 --> 00:48:12.527
So you could watch a YouTube video, let's say, of someone that you like and they're playing.

00:48:12.746 --> 00:48:16.710
You can take the audio, extract the audio, put it into transcribe, slow it down.

00:48:16.931 --> 00:48:20.514
But until you take the time to do that, again, forget the tablature.

00:48:20.574 --> 00:48:26.782
You're missing the most important part of the whole process, which is learning how to hear music.

00:48:26.978 --> 00:48:32.702
Again, there's so much information to be gleaned when you really try to absorb and become that player.

00:48:32.722 --> 00:48:35.164
And I have a whole method for doing it.

00:48:35.545 --> 00:48:36.565
I'll distill it really quickly.

00:48:36.626 --> 00:48:36.967
It's this.

00:48:37.086 --> 00:48:42.692
I mean, let's say you have a 12-bar solo, whatever it is, you know, Sonny Boy, you know, it doesn't matter.

00:48:42.731 --> 00:48:48.516
You break it up and you mark the bars and you take it bar by bar or phrase by phrase.

00:48:48.757 --> 00:48:51.199
You know, I'll sometimes take a musical phrase or a riff.

00:48:51.579 --> 00:48:52.320
Oh, here's this riff.

00:48:52.400 --> 00:48:53.141
Go to the next one.

00:48:53.181 --> 00:48:54.601
Okay, this is how you play this.

00:48:55.121 --> 00:48:56.242
And then you go to the next one.

00:48:56.262 --> 00:48:56.943
You're not writing anything.

00:48:56.943 --> 00:49:00.632
thing down and you, oh, I can, okay, this is how this goes and I can play this.

00:49:01.054 --> 00:49:08.050
You're not committing anything to memory, but you know that you can confidently repeat and play those, each of those phrases really well.

00:49:08.322 --> 00:49:10.844
Second step, you get to the end of the 12 bars.

00:49:10.884 --> 00:49:11.824
You're going sequentially.

00:49:11.864 --> 00:49:22.514
Now, when you want to put it all together, what I used to do with the tape recorder is you'd have to rewind to the beginning and start bar one and then bar one and two and then bar one, two and three.

00:49:22.554 --> 00:49:29.760
What happens is that your brain is going, oh, I've got one, two, three now solid, but then you got to string one, two, three and four together.

00:49:29.820 --> 00:49:33.304
So you got to go back to bar four and how does that go again?

00:49:33.423 --> 00:49:33.804
Oh yeah.

00:49:33.824 --> 00:49:33.983
Okay.

00:49:34.003 --> 00:49:36.405
And then go back to one, two, three and go one, two, three and four.

00:49:36.927 --> 00:49:44.335
But every time you get to four, You're so focused on playing bars 1, 2, and 3 that when you get to 4, it's like, oh, do I still know how to play this well?

00:49:45.398 --> 00:49:45.757
Maybe.

00:49:45.797 --> 00:49:49.724
And the farther you get into the tune, the more that starts to happen.

00:49:50.585 --> 00:49:57.775
So what I figured out, as soon as I got the program transcribed, because I can see visually the audio spectrum, it was just a revelation when it hit me one day.

00:49:57.795 --> 00:49:59.818
If I start at bar 12...

00:50:00.130 --> 00:50:00.831
Play that.

00:50:01.130 --> 00:50:04.094
I've already, remember, I've already acquainted myself with each little bar.

00:50:04.735 --> 00:50:11.844
But if I start at bar 12 and I want to commit the whole thing to memory, I start at bar 12, snap back to your marker with bar 11.

00:50:12.184 --> 00:50:14.288
And I go, okay, I reacquaint myself with 11.

00:50:14.327 --> 00:50:16.630
And then I play 11 and 12 together.

00:50:16.670 --> 00:50:23.539
And what I'm doing is I'm starting bar 11 is the sort of newer chunk of information I want to put into memory.

00:50:24.039 --> 00:50:28.266
But when it comes to bar 12, I'm just reaffirming what I learned a moment ago.

00:50:28.802 --> 00:50:42.487
And you'd be amazed how fast this stuff starts to become because you're just, all it is is you're like, I mean, to sound really pedantic and scientific about it, it's just, you're creating new neuronal connections of memory, like a little memory pathway.

00:50:42.527 --> 00:50:47.657
But when you do it that way, you keep reaffirming what you know, and then you go to bar 10 and you do the same thing.

00:50:47.969 --> 00:50:51.775
And you reacquaint yourself with bar 10 because you already played it.

00:50:51.976 --> 00:50:52.697
Okay, it goes like this.

00:50:53.159 --> 00:50:56.284
And then you reaffirm what you played a moment ago, which is bar 11 and 12.

00:50:56.364 --> 00:50:58.568
And you keep reaffirming the older stuff.

00:50:58.807 --> 00:51:02.034
You have to do the work in the time, but it's amazing

00:51:02.114 --> 00:51:02.855
how fast it goes.

00:51:03.356 --> 00:51:04.797
There's a lot of online resources now.

00:51:04.858 --> 00:51:06.440
There's a lot of online teaching.

00:51:06.862 --> 00:51:10.307
Why do you think people should come to your online teaching?

00:51:10.327 --> 00:51:13.672
Because actually, I don't think anyone's talked about transcribing this way.

00:51:14.273 --> 00:51:16.739
I think people need to actually do it and see me do it.

00:51:17.239 --> 00:51:19.864
And you realize how valuable, invaluable it is.

00:51:20.385 --> 00:51:22.690
It's just like such an amazing way to work.

00:51:23.130 --> 00:51:27.159
And the software itself, it makes just faster work of doing it.

00:51:27.780 --> 00:51:32.530
Question I ask each time is if you had 10 minutes to practice, what would you spend those 10 minutes doing?

00:51:33.090 --> 00:51:44.702
Lately, I've just been practicing just patterns and different keys and through like a cycle of force or chromatically down, just anything that kind of pushes me.

00:51:44.762 --> 00:51:47.405
I'm never going to be a hardcore jazz guy.

00:51:47.865 --> 00:51:49.728
It's actually opening up my blues playing.

00:51:50.447 --> 00:51:59.518
So if I try to play something in a weird key, it's helping my regular playing and stuff and just helps me to be a bit more free in the easy keys, if that makes any sense.

00:51:59.969 --> 00:52:04.077
Like, I mean, you know, even something like a triad coming down chromatically.

00:52:04.117 --> 00:52:08.204
That's

00:52:08.264 --> 00:52:10.166
the, just a whole one, two, three, four.

00:52:10.206 --> 00:52:11.548
But if you take it from the third.

00:52:20.664 --> 00:52:21.405
Et cetera, et cetera.

00:52:21.445 --> 00:52:21.786
So you.

00:52:22.114 --> 00:52:33.204
You have to literally think in your head, okay, now I'm in G, now I'm in F sharp, now I'm in F, now I'm in E, now I'm in E flat, and sort of visualize those patterns in each one of those key centers.

00:52:33.284 --> 00:52:35.005
It's a real workout.

00:52:35.525 --> 00:52:37.827
I just was doing that a little bit today with a metronome.

00:52:38.288 --> 00:52:43.132
Because I just started to visualize it, it's like, oh, I can actually think my way through this slowly.

00:52:43.713 --> 00:52:52.661
In a nutshell, lately, that's what I've been practicing, just different things that just sort of push me and challenge me to think clearly and deliberately in different key centers.

00:52:53.184 --> 00:52:56.414
Just talking some questions around gear now.

00:52:56.737 --> 00:52:58.784
First off, which harmonica do you play?

00:52:58.804 --> 00:53:01.192
I understood you played golden melodies for a long time.

00:53:01.233 --> 00:53:03.661
Yeah, golden melodies are...

00:53:04.065 --> 00:53:07.949
My first choice, I guess, partly I just like the way they feel in my hand.

00:53:08.250 --> 00:53:12.753
Honestly, I retune them so they're not equal temperament, which is they're out of the box, they're equal temperament.

00:53:12.833 --> 00:53:24.565
I retune them so they're more like a compromised or like an alternate just intonation, you know, not as hardcore as a straight-ahead marine band, but pretty close so that you can still play, like, draw five.

00:53:24.646 --> 00:53:33.014
It's not so flat as it should be in a just intonation so that I can play that as a root note in first flat position or 12th position.

00:53:33.505 --> 00:53:35.206
Yeah, but golden mellow is my preference.

00:53:35.927 --> 00:53:39.610
And then crossovers, I really like crossovers, especially for the low keys because they're nice and bright.

00:53:39.751 --> 00:53:41.333
And I like the brightness on a low key.

00:53:41.813 --> 00:53:48.998
But otherwise, for anything higher than a B flat or a C, I prefer a golden mellow just because they're a little bit rounder sounding.

00:53:49.360 --> 00:53:54.143
But I confess, I also have stock of a bunch of old stock reeds.

00:53:54.443 --> 00:54:02.871
Before Hohner changed the alloy in the metal of the reeds in the late 90s, I bought a huge stock of old reeds and replaced the reeds.

00:54:03.172 --> 00:54:05.536
And I think they sustain overblows better.

00:54:05.576 --> 00:54:09.403
There's a rumor here that golden melodies are better for overblows.

00:54:09.423 --> 00:54:10.286
Do you think that is true?

00:54:10.847 --> 00:54:12.028
No, no, it has nothing to do with it.

00:54:12.210 --> 00:54:14.914
It's simply how the reed is offset.

00:54:15.275 --> 00:54:22.030
And even the newer alloy metal, which I don't think is quite as stable for overblows, you can set them up properly and they're fine.

00:54:22.561 --> 00:54:24.963
And do you have a favorite key of harmonica?

00:54:25.003 --> 00:54:27.266
I always like to preempt this with a guess.

00:54:27.286 --> 00:54:30.329
So I'm guessing that G is your favorite key.

00:54:30.349 --> 00:54:40.617
Yeah, G and A flat are my favorite keys because they're right in that sweet spot where, you know, you start getting into lower harps and the lower notes are a little bit harder to respond well, but they still sound big and fat.

00:54:41.197 --> 00:54:43.380
Amps wise, what's your amp of choice?

00:54:43.679 --> 00:54:44.420
Big amp first.

00:54:44.880 --> 00:54:49.184
I mean, you know, straight out of the box, you can't go wrong with a Fender Bassman reissue.

00:54:49.806 --> 00:54:53.648
You know, they have an amp tech, retweak it so they're down the mids a little bit.

00:54:53.949 --> 00:54:57.452
I had one that I had rejigged to a hand point to point wiring.

00:54:57.893 --> 00:54:59.713
Then I have a bunch of little boutique amps.

00:55:00.195 --> 00:55:02.817
I like marble amps actually, because I've toured in Europe quite a bit.

00:55:03.137 --> 00:55:05.438
I own three marble amps, two that live in Europe.

00:55:05.699 --> 00:55:16.088
That one is just like a eight or nine watt version of their marble max, but it's got a 10 inch speaker and it takes a 6L6 instead of a 6V6.

00:55:16.108 --> 00:55:22.353
So the transformer is a bit bigger than your stock 6V6, which would be in something like a five watt champ.

00:55:22.561 --> 00:55:28.746
And then there was another one that came out for a bootcamp called the Spirit Heart Pro.

00:55:28.947 --> 00:55:31.210
And the guy only ever made about a hundred of them.

00:55:31.690 --> 00:55:36.454
I own one, then I bought another one from another guy and they've got bass treble and mid control on them.

00:55:36.534 --> 00:55:40.097
And I really liked them because they're like a mini basement, but only five Watts.

00:55:40.277 --> 00:55:47.423
And I had one of them jigged up to more like a 10 watt amp again, so they could take a six, a six L six, but I still prefer the five watt version.

00:55:47.563 --> 00:55:49.465
It's got a different, so different sound to it.

00:55:50.206 --> 00:55:50.326
Yeah.

00:55:50.385 --> 00:55:52.208
I've been hearing, hearing good things about the mobile amps.

00:55:52.527 --> 00:55:52.829
Yeah.

00:55:52.929 --> 00:55:57.257
And so I also own their biggest one, which is called the heart master.

00:55:57.757 --> 00:55:59.822
They have a six, eight version and it's four tens.

00:55:59.862 --> 00:56:03.990
I have the four 10 version and it's got a bunch of Ted Weber P10 cues in it.

00:56:04.050 --> 00:56:05.313
It's like driving a Cadillac.

00:56:05.697 --> 00:56:07.199
And what about effects pedals?

00:56:07.659 --> 00:56:09.121
I'm a delay-a-holic.

00:56:09.541 --> 00:56:11.563
I've tried almost every delay pedal under the sun.

00:56:11.822 --> 00:56:15.987
And I'll say the best one for the money, it's not cheap, but it's fully programmable.

00:56:16.047 --> 00:56:22.052
You can save presets and making really great analog or tape delay simulations.

00:56:22.492 --> 00:56:26.436
This digital one is called the Echo System by Empress Effects.

00:56:26.496 --> 00:56:27.396
It's a Canadian company.

00:56:27.436 --> 00:56:34.862
They make analog dry through signal path, which just means that you're hearing the original sound and the effect is only digital.

00:56:34.922 --> 00:57:02.344
Whereas a lot of the boss pedals and stuff when you engage the pedal it's the whole thing becomes digital so including your dry sound and so that affects the tone that's my main go-to but i use it very subtly two basic settings i use like a hard more of a hard slap for fast certain fast tunes and then a sort of a longer uh a tap tempo delay that depending on the tempo i usually choose a sort of a triplet delay And I'll very judiciously use a bit of reverb.

00:57:02.364 --> 00:57:05.266
I went to the dark side and got a pedal board a while ago.

00:57:05.306 --> 00:57:16.438
And then I have another Empress FX pedal that is called the Nebulas, which is basically, it does everything from chorusing and flanging and sort of Leslie effects.

00:57:16.498 --> 00:57:19.260
But again, I only use it like twice a night.

00:57:19.740 --> 00:57:24.365
I use my reverb pedal maybe twice a night, but the delay I use almost all the time.

00:57:24.545 --> 00:57:28.150
And then I have a kinder anti-feedback, which I...

00:57:28.514 --> 00:57:32.568
like what it does using it very minimally, but just having it in the sequence.

00:57:32.809 --> 00:57:35.117
I also use Lone Wolf.

00:57:36.079 --> 00:57:36.561
The octave.

00:57:36.943 --> 00:57:37.525
Yeah.

00:57:37.985 --> 00:57:42.369
And it's not an octaver, but it boosts sort of low-end harmonics and high-end harmonics.

00:57:43.010 --> 00:57:45.693
And again, used very judiciously.

00:57:45.793 --> 00:57:48.034
I have it on one of its lowest settings.

00:57:49.036 --> 00:57:50.217
It only works for certain amps.

00:57:50.257 --> 00:57:52.978
You honestly don't need it for certain amps, like bigger amps.

00:57:53.539 --> 00:57:56.782
And that's something I've just discovered recently, which is actually an MXR.

00:57:56.822 --> 00:57:58.543
It's just called an amp boost.

00:57:58.603 --> 00:58:03.768
It's sort of a clean boost, but you can help little amps sound bigger than they really are.

00:58:03.867 --> 00:58:37.918
And you can help bigger amps have more breakup, but in a kind of a clean way actually lone wolf makes a really good version of that too it's just called harp tone and i have that and depending on the amp like everything depends on the amp you're using you know um but yeah i'm not shy to to put in pedals to change the tone especially for live playing often when i'm playing in for the studio the only thing i might use is maybe a bit of the kinder anti-feedback and i'll add the delay in the plugins because you can just fool around more when you're mixing and stuff and editing

00:58:38.434 --> 00:58:43.577
Touching a bit on the tone, every harmonica player answers this by saying, oh, the tone comes from you.

00:58:43.659 --> 00:58:46.041
But we talked about the great tone you got earlier on.

00:58:46.920 --> 00:58:51.364
How much is that, do you think, have you developed through the sound, through the amps and the pedals that you're using?

00:58:51.945 --> 00:58:53.007
No, absolutely.

00:58:53.067 --> 00:58:54.108
It's absolutely true.

00:58:54.148 --> 00:58:58.271
I mean, it starts with you and your head tone and your mouth tone.

00:58:58.291 --> 00:59:02.574
I confess, I have terrible hand microphone technique.

00:59:02.675 --> 00:59:37.987
I hold the harp, by the way, in my right hand, which is completely the cup of my right hand which does not make any sense for doing wah but i just switched that way when i was young but i still make my tone work because i've got good head tone but my microphone technique i can't play with a bullet mic i just i don't know how to get a good sound it just doesn't feel comfortable to me which mic do you use mainly the re10 the electro voice which is discontinued and there's another one called the 664a which is kind of like an earlier version of that You have to get a mic tech to turn it into an XLR mic.

00:59:38.047 --> 00:59:42.105
It's a bit of a hassle, but they work nicely for small amps.

00:59:42.690 --> 00:59:45.193
But that electro voice is a dynamic mic then?

00:59:45.552 --> 00:59:46.134
Yeah.

00:59:46.173 --> 00:59:54.121
Okay, so isn't, you know, a lot of people consider a harmonica microphone then, you know, so the tone you're getting is through a dynamic mic.

00:59:54.443 --> 00:59:54.702
Yeah.

00:59:55.224 --> 01:00:02.110
Again, I think that shows, doesn't it, you know, people are on this mission to find all this harmonica equipment, but, you know, you're using a dynamic mic, which is what

01:00:02.190 --> 01:00:02.311
people...

01:00:02.391 --> 01:00:05.014
As opposed to, you mean, like a crystal mic or a magnetic cartridge, you mean?

01:00:05.355 --> 01:00:08.478
Yeah, yeah, sort of, or a crystal, yeah, exactly, yeah.

01:00:08.641 --> 01:00:12.706
Again, I think you have to have really good hand technique.

01:00:13.387 --> 01:00:17.853
Everything is a marriage of the combination of the amp, the microphone, and your own technique.

01:00:18.273 --> 01:00:20.956
All is what marries to what's going to produce the final sound.

01:00:21.396 --> 01:00:26.543
Yeah, and the last question then on the discussion is, obviously we're in pandemic time at the moment.

01:00:26.583 --> 01:00:31.630
Have you got any plans beyond that later in the year or next year about playing or more albums?

01:00:32.097 --> 01:00:40.889
Well, I've got a tour planned, half the tour, more than half the tour that I just did in March, which got cancelled right in the middle of the tour because of the pandemic.

01:00:41.150 --> 01:00:44.673
I've rebooked those dates, so hopefully we can actually do it and people are coming out.

01:00:44.713 --> 01:00:47.197
And I don't have plans for a new record at the moment.

01:00:47.538 --> 01:00:52.625
I'd like to find someone to do, I don't know if I want to do another blues monger, I'd love to do another duo record.

01:00:52.925 --> 01:00:55.128
I'd like to find someone just to do something different again.

01:00:55.168 --> 01:00:58.192
So thanks very much, Carlos, for joining the podcast.

01:00:58.211 --> 01:00:59.773
It's been a real pleasure to speak to you today.

01:01:00.097 --> 01:01:02.643
Thanks so much, man, for taking the time, Neil.

01:01:03.083 --> 01:01:04.405
That's it for today, folks.

01:01:04.746 --> 01:01:12.501
Final word from my sponsor, the Longwolf Blues Company, providing some great effects pedals and microphones, all purpose-built for the harmonica.

01:01:12.822 --> 01:01:14.344
Be sure to check out their website.