Oct. 27, 2022

Paul Reddick interview

Paul Reddick interview

Paul Reddick joins me on episode 72. Paul is a singer, songwriter and harmonica player based in Toronto, Canada. He rose to prominence with his band: Paul Reddick and the Sidemen in the 1990s. Paul describes himself as not a typical blues harmonica player, often using his sparse notes with heavy delay, while also making the use of complex patterns to build interesting rhythms. Paul developed his songwriting approach using the structure of poetry, and his insightful and thoughtful blues ...

Paul Reddick joins me on episode 72.

Paul is a singer, songwriter and harmonica player based in Toronto, Canada. He rose to prominence with his band: Paul Reddick and the Sidemen in the 1990s. Paul describes himself as not a typical blues harmonica player, often using his sparse notes with heavy delay, while also making the use of complex patterns to build interesting rhythms. 

Paul developed his songwriting approach using the structure of poetry, and his insightful and thoughtful blues lyrics have earned him the title of the Poet Laureate of the Blues, including winning the Maple Blues Award for songwriter of the year for his album Sugarbird in 2009.

 
Links:

Paul's website:
https://paulreddick.ca/

Lyrics:
https://paulreddick.ca/lyrics

Styrmon El Capistan delay pedal:
https://www.strymon.net/product/elcapistan/


Videos:

Blue Eventide (Official Music Video):
https://youtu.be/GpYU91lmS2Y

Mourning Dove:
https://youtu.be/eOrFt-aCbXU

Luna Moth and Butterfly:
https://youtu.be/HwrF_cd38aY

Paul Reddick & The Gamblers - One More Day:
https://youtu.be/V1QF8LMeXT4


Podcast website:
https://www.harmonicahappyhour.com

Donations:
If you want to make a voluntary donation to help support the running costs of the podcast then please use this link (or visit the podcast website link above):
https://paypal.me/harmonicahappyhour?locale.x=en_GB

Spotify Playlist:
Also check out the Spotify Playlist, which contains most of the songs discussed in the podcast:
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5QC6RF2VTfs4iPuasJBqwT?si=M-j3IkiISeefhR7ybm9qIQ

Podcast sponsors:
This podcast is sponsored by SEYDEL harmonicas - visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seydel1847.com  or on Facebook or Instagram at SEYDEL HARMONICAS
and Blows Me Away Productions: http://www.blowsmeaway.com/

Support the show

01:36 - Paul is a singer, songwriter and harmonica player based in Toronto, Canada

02:09 - There aren’t any dedicated blues venues remaining in Toronto

02:44 - Toronto is not far from Chicago and New York, so draws acts from there

03:08 - Blues scene in Canada is split into the different cities

04:27 - Paul received a harmonica for Christmas age 13 and started playing melodies before discovering 2nd position

06:25 - Harmonica is only instrument, apart from vocals

06:43 - Started singing in bands in High School

08:39 - Judicious approach to playing the harmonica

08:59 - Blues is Paul’s foundation, and how he listened to blues bands thinking why they played what they played

10:04 - Felt compulsion to find his own way to play

11:01 - A lot of the blues songs Paul writes aren’t a typical 12-bar and he isn’t your usual blues harmonica player

11:53 - Paul makes use of patterns a lot in his playing and influence of rhythmic Sonny Terry playing

13:45 - Ride The One album, which is based on playing over one chord

14:48 - Paul’s approach is understated and doesn’t contain many ‘tricks’

15:17 - First band was with Paul Reddick & The Sidemen, formed in 1990

15:51 - Opened up for James Cotton as part of a duo before The Sidemen was formed

16:25 - Paul Reddick & The Sidemen were very popular in Toronto with their hard driving style

17:22 - Uses a lot of delay effect

18:13 - 2001 ‘Rattlebag' album was nominated for a Juno and WC Handy Award, produced by Colin Linden

20:04 - I’m A Criminal song was used in a US Coca Cola commercial

21:25 - Toured the US, which started his career away from The Sidemen

22:51 - Villanelle album was first under his own name

24:11 - Songwriting started in earnest with Rattlebag and Villanelle albums

25:09 - Used the structure of poetry to write songs

26:14 - Paul’s lyrics are available on his website and won songwriter of the year award for Sugarbird album

28:49 - Has been described as the Poet Laureate of the Blues and documenting his lyrics

31:03 - Solo albums not conventional blues albums

31:33 - Wishbone album, Blue Wing song and use of low harps

32:23 - Doesn’t use higher pitched harmonicas and harp choice for key of C

33:04 - Ride The One album which won a Juno award in 2016

35:08 - Alive In Italia is most recent release, written as a ‘love letter to Italy’ recorded with The Gamblers

37:42 - New album under development which should be released in Spring 2023, followed by a tour in Europe

39:08 - Financials of releasing albums these days

42:31 - Has produced a fine set of music videos, some of which he released weekly during Covid

44:21 - In 2014 Paul set-up the Cobalt Prize for Contemporary Blues Composition, in Canada

47:28 - Some of Paul’s music used in film and television soundtracks

48:52 - 10 minute question

50:03 - Plays some chromatic harmonica, but mainly in the studio and not live

50:40 - Different positions used when playing diatonic

51:04 - Plays Hohner Marine Band, Deluxe and Crossovers

51:30 - Doesn’t play any different tunings

51:33 - Doesn’t use overblows

52:13 - Embouchre: tongue-block

52:55 - Amps

53:36 - Delay pedal used is El Capistan

54:29 - Mic: uses Shure Beta SM57

54:43 - Uses a Lone Wolf Harp Octave pedal sometimes

56:23 - Future plans and love of touring

WEBVTT

00:00:00.546 --> 00:00:02.787
Paul Reddick joins me on episode 72.

00:00:03.248 --> 00:00:07.152
Paul is a singer, songwriter and harmonica player based in Toronto, Canada.

00:00:07.532 --> 00:00:11.435
He rose to prominence with his band, Paul Reddick and the Sidemen, in the 1990s.

00:00:12.396 --> 00:00:22.524
Paul describes himself as not a typical blues harmonica player, often using sparse notes with heavy delay, while also making the use of complex patterns to build interesting rhythms.

00:00:23.004 --> 00:00:41.406
Paul developed his songwriting approach using the structure of poetry, and his insightful and thoughtful blues lyrics have earned him the title of the Poet Laureate of the Blues, including winning the Maple Blues Award for Songwriting of the Year for his album Sugarbird in 2009.

00:01:25.058 --> 00:01:27.079
Hello, Paul Reddick, and welcome to the podcast.

00:01:28.061 --> 00:01:28.462
Hi, Neil.

00:01:28.602 --> 00:01:30.483
Thank you very much for having me here.

00:01:30.984 --> 00:01:31.605
That's a pleasure.

00:01:31.686 --> 00:01:34.649
So you're based in Toronto in Canada, yeah?

00:01:35.069 --> 00:01:35.510
That's right.

00:01:35.930 --> 00:01:36.131
Cool.

00:01:36.210 --> 00:01:42.337
And you're a singer, songwriter, and harmonica player, playing a combination of what, blues and sort of roots music?

00:01:42.858 --> 00:01:43.478
Yeah, I'd say so.

00:01:43.498 --> 00:01:56.325
I write all the songs that I play, and they're all based in blues, but not all traditional 12-bar or particular to a particular blues style so I guess roots is the word you use.

00:01:56.885 --> 00:01:58.606
So are you from Toronto originally?

00:01:59.126 --> 00:02:08.836
Yes I was born in Toronto but I grew up outside of Toronto from my primary school days through high school but I've been back there for 35 years or something like that.

00:02:09.156 --> 00:02:12.679
So what's the music scene like there and the blues scene particularly?

00:02:12.938 --> 00:02:43.789
Well there was a time when I was younger that there were a few dedicated blues bars and at that time the artists from Chicago would come through Toronto and play so I saw lots of people at various places but as the blues scene got older and etc etc there there actually aren't any dedicated blues venues in Toronto I tend to play at mixed alternative bars that I play in town where there are some blues bands but the scene is pretty good there are a number of blues acts that play and they find places to play in the city

00:02:44.091 --> 00:02:52.079
yeah so I guess Toronto it's not far from sort of Chicago and kind of New York on the other side is it so it's must be quite a draw for the musicians from there too

00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:57.274
I drove to to Chicago recently and it was about a nine hour drive and New York is similar.

00:02:57.373 --> 00:03:01.807
So we got all the Chicago guys coming up here on a regular basis when they existed.

00:03:01.848 --> 00:03:04.455
The ones that are there now don't tour as much.

00:03:04.836 --> 00:03:07.151
It's a rarity to have a And

00:03:08.073 --> 00:03:09.395
what about Canada itself?

00:03:09.474 --> 00:03:12.860
Where does Toronto stand on the music map in Canada?

00:03:13.141 --> 00:03:16.949
Well, there are blue scenes that exist in all the major cities.

00:03:16.989 --> 00:03:22.117
There's on the east side of Canada, Halifax has a pretty cool scene and a style.

00:03:22.138 --> 00:03:26.384
They're kind of probably more influenced by their proximity to Boston.

00:03:26.818 --> 00:03:32.927
Then to Toronto or Chicago, they've got a particular and pretty traditional blues style that's great.

00:03:33.368 --> 00:03:37.295
And then Montreal has some players, which are moving from east to west.

00:03:37.536 --> 00:03:38.518
Then Toronto, of course.

00:03:38.918 --> 00:03:47.051
Winnipeg, which is in the first part of the western plains of Canada, has an interesting blues scene and a few guys that are well-known.

00:03:47.492 --> 00:03:48.093
And then...

00:03:48.449 --> 00:03:52.430
Saskatoon is the next city where there's also a cool blues club.

00:03:52.872 --> 00:04:19.456
And then in Alberta, Edmonton and Calgary both have bands there and big festivals the blue scenes are somewhat insular to the city that we live in and occasionally people will tour in and out but i don't get a lot of bands from halifax playing in toronto or a lot of bands from edmonton playing in toronto you go there and you see them and they tour in their province in their region but not far not often nationally these days it's touring is cost prohibitive

00:04:20.017 --> 00:04:29.305
so great so um say you're a you're a singer and songwriter is very important so we'll get on to that but also of course this is a harmonica podcast so uh What got you started playing harmonica?

00:04:29.826 --> 00:04:41.939
Well, I guess like a lot of people when I was a kid, probably 13, I actually just was at a family reunion and my uncle had a, there was a blues harp in a little blue plastic case.

00:04:42.360 --> 00:04:46.706
They used to come in and I was curious as to what that blue plastic case was.

00:04:46.725 --> 00:04:49.829
And I opened it up and somehow decided that I could play the thing.

00:04:49.889 --> 00:04:51.951
And I asked my mum to get me one.

00:04:52.331 --> 00:04:58.250
This was a Christmas party for Christmas and I got one and I could play, you know, jingle bells and, Stuff like that.

00:04:58.290 --> 00:05:05.521
By the end of the day, which I felt encouraged and kept practicing, I played just songs like that in the first part.

00:05:05.540 --> 00:05:12.630
Just played Oh Susanna and Jingle Bells and On Top of Old Smoky so I could find the positions of where the notes were.

00:05:12.670 --> 00:05:16.817
And then eventually I did have one blues record.

00:05:16.836 --> 00:05:20.201
I think it was the Segal Schwall Blues Band from Chicago.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
...

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
...

00:05:31.682 --> 00:05:34.446
And I began listening to that and trying to play along.

00:05:34.485 --> 00:05:40.095
And then eventually someone told me about, you know, that you needed to have second position.

00:05:40.115 --> 00:05:42.418
I just began with that.

00:05:42.699 --> 00:05:52.012
And then someone at the music store, when I asked for records appropriate to harmonica, gave me double albums of Muddy Waters, Little Walter, Sonny Williamson and Helen Wolfe.

00:05:52.033 --> 00:05:54.175
And that set me on the course of my life.

00:05:54.817 --> 00:05:55.098
Great.

00:05:55.177 --> 00:05:57.401
Any particular songs that really grabbed you?

00:05:57.841 --> 00:05:58.302
All of them.

00:05:58.723 --> 00:06:00.446
I found all those artists amazing.

00:06:00.577 --> 00:06:08.946
I guess Muddy might have been my favorite as a singer and his songs, but I mean, really they're, they're all masterpieces and I consider every song

00:06:08.966 --> 00:06:09.245
a

00:06:11.408 --> 00:06:17.434
masterpiece.

00:06:22.699 --> 00:06:24.721
So were you playing any other instruments?

00:06:24.761 --> 00:06:27.142
Sounds like harmonica was probably your first instrument, was it?

00:06:27.543 --> 00:06:27.843
It is.

00:06:27.923 --> 00:06:29.644
And I don't play any other instruments.

00:06:29.886 --> 00:06:39.584
I, We had a piano in our house, and I would noodle on it, but for some reason the harmonica is the thing which I found natural and could play.

00:06:39.624 --> 00:06:41.165
And what about the singing?

00:06:41.326 --> 00:06:43.108
Did you take that up after the harmonica?

00:06:43.149 --> 00:06:51.221
I sang because I started a band in high school, like when I was 15, 16 years old, and no one else would sing.

00:06:51.262 --> 00:06:58.694
So I sang a little bit, and then when eventually I started a proper band in my 20s, it was the same situation, and I...

00:06:59.105 --> 00:07:00.927
just took for granted that I would sing.

00:07:01.788 --> 00:07:09.536
I had, in studying harmonica, not really paid too close attention to the singing part or the guitar or the drums or the bass.

00:07:09.555 --> 00:07:13.740
I mean, you hear them, but they weren't a thing that I was focused on learning.

00:07:14.201 --> 00:07:22.608
So I didn't really learn the lyrics to the songs, but eventually I began to sing and did covers when we were early in our career.

00:07:23.108 --> 00:07:26.593
But the singing part has become a big part of what I do.

00:07:26.833 --> 00:07:27.793
I love singing.

00:07:28.065 --> 00:07:30.189
I'm getting better at it as I get older.

00:07:31.271 --> 00:07:34.394
Definitely, yeah, you've got a good gravelly blues voice these days,

00:07:37.098 --> 00:07:43.689
I think.

00:07:44.309 --> 00:07:49.196
Yeah, my voice does have some roughness in it, but not always, but it is nice to have that.

00:07:49.997 --> 00:07:52.781
It depends on the type of song where it...

00:07:54.081 --> 00:07:58.326
the volume of the song, how much air is going over your, your vocal cords.

00:07:58.387 --> 00:08:04.834
But I, I am pleased that it has that, it has some personality sometimes.

00:08:05.415 --> 00:08:05.995
Yeah, definitely.

00:08:06.016 --> 00:08:06.235
Yeah.

00:08:06.276 --> 00:08:06.817
It sounds great.

00:08:07.216 --> 00:08:13.103
And so when you started singing in high school, obviously then, then you were playing harmonica, you, you saw those two going together, obviously.

00:08:13.144 --> 00:08:21.173
And that was something, you know, did you feel that you needed to sing as a harmonica player to make you a, you know, more central to the band and you wanted to be a band leader or?

00:08:21.762 --> 00:08:29.009
I think I wanted to be a band leader, and singing was something I could do, seeing as I was incapable.

00:08:29.250 --> 00:08:38.539
As I say, I'm guitar player dependent, and I'm lucky to play with great guitar players, but I guess singing was something that I could do.

00:08:39.380 --> 00:08:43.044
So your harmonica playing, I think you've termed it as being judicious.

00:08:43.065 --> 00:08:45.467
You're quite selective with your notes.

00:08:45.788 --> 00:08:48.350
You don't overplay a lot of the time.

00:08:50.594 --> 00:08:50.813
piano plays

00:08:59.457 --> 00:09:03.325
And I think you would describe yourself not necessarily as a blues harmonica player, yeah?

00:09:04.287 --> 00:09:07.133
All the music I play, blues is my foundation.

00:09:07.173 --> 00:09:15.268
One, four, and five are tattooed in my brain as chord changes, although I force myself to look at the other numbers.

00:09:16.991 --> 00:09:24.799
When I started listening to Little Walter when I was 13, 14 years, and playing along with him.

00:09:24.841 --> 00:09:32.089
One of the things I remember wondering was, why did the musicians make the decisions that they did at that time?

00:09:32.129 --> 00:09:36.053
Like, why did they play what they played, let alone how did they play what they played?

00:09:36.293 --> 00:09:40.278
I was always fascinated and never had anyone to ask that question at that age.

00:09:40.698 --> 00:09:53.624
But I assumed that there was, because amongst those guys that I had, and there were others too, but Howlin' Wolf and Sonny Williamson and Little Walter and Junior Wells or whoever it might be, they played in such a distinctive style.

00:09:53.803 --> 00:09:56.028
They had really their own voices.

00:09:56.649 --> 00:10:03.943
When Junior played with Muddy and Walter played with Muddy, they played a certain way that made them seem similar, but there was still a uniqueness to what they did.

00:10:04.325 --> 00:10:15.432
And I think I felt, I don't know if the word is responsibility, but a compulsion to try to play my own way as well, to find the voice that I could play a solo, which I would be able to make the correct decisions.

00:10:15.854 --> 00:10:26.285
And so I've always tried to find a way to do my own thing within using the vocabulary that you glean from the pre-existing harmonica players, you know, the riffs and the licks.

00:10:26.927 --> 00:10:39.705
But I think one of the things that allowed me to be unique is that I believe that I suffer from some sort of maybe a learning disability or a Something very difficult for me to memorize things.

00:10:39.904 --> 00:10:42.227
And even to this day, I just made a new record.

00:10:42.288 --> 00:10:45.731
And to learn the lyrics, my memory is like Teflon.

00:10:46.091 --> 00:10:47.553
It's not like Velcro.

00:10:47.854 --> 00:10:50.197
So I did a lot of things which were...

00:10:50.697 --> 00:10:58.927
I would play something around what they were playing rather than what they were playing without knowing that it would serve me well in terms of developing a style.

00:10:59.027 --> 00:11:04.994
I mean, I can play blues harmonica style, but a lot of the songs that I wrote weren't specifically...

00:11:05.313 --> 00:11:08.639
of a 12-bar Chicago stylistically.

00:11:08.958 --> 00:11:13.566
To be a stylist wasn't something I was capable of doing or wanted to do.

00:11:14.267 --> 00:11:21.398
So the songs that I wrote and the way that I approached playing, I kind of avoided doing something that seemed familiar to me.

00:11:21.437 --> 00:11:23.341
I thought, I don't want to sound like Little Walter.

00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:25.745
I don't want to be my Little Walter.

00:11:25.985 --> 00:11:28.828
And so that allowed me to create my own style.

00:11:28.908 --> 00:11:37.625
And whereas I'm not a blues harmonica player, I would say I'm not one who is able to pull off a really great chicago style harmonic instrumental

00:11:37.924 --> 00:12:12.183
yeah i think listening to you know music as i have been doing for the preparation for this you know it is it is quite a unique style you have definitely you know i can't i was listening sort of trying to think who you sound like and i don't think there are that many people who you do sound like you've got these you know you have have quite these kind of spacious sort of solos or you have sort of use of patterns which you use quite a lot as well so Just on that use of patterns, how you develop that.

00:12:12.644 --> 00:12:19.985
I remember when I was young and had Sonny Terry records and listening to Sonny Terry play it and trying to learn what he was doing.

00:12:20.025 --> 00:12:22.352
It's sort of miraculous what Sonny Terry does.

00:12:23.234 --> 00:12:31.562
I found it very unpleasant to try to emulate the muscularly in the motion of your chest and your throat, his patterns that he did.

00:12:31.822 --> 00:12:39.490
And I think perhaps rhythmic harp playing may be unique to each person that plays it, depending on how they feel when they're doing it.

00:12:39.932 --> 00:12:49.501
So I would do kind of a variation upon a Sonny Terry theme to do, as I was playing in a bluegrass band when I was in high school, which is pretty rhythmic to play.

00:12:49.826 --> 00:12:53.952
You know, the mandolins or the banjos going chunk, chunk, chunk, chunk.

00:12:54.033 --> 00:12:54.715
It's all rhythmic.

00:12:54.754 --> 00:13:00.303
So I tried to create, you know, things to go on top of that.

00:13:00.384 --> 00:13:08.238
And in the soloing, we're largely rhythmic solos, probably based on my interpretation of the way that Sonny Terry would have played.

00:13:08.558 --> 00:13:09.580
That evolved through my life.

00:13:09.660 --> 00:13:11.823
It was something that I use and go to.

00:13:12.205 --> 00:13:14.870
And I like playing rhythmic patterns in quite a few songs.

00:13:15.169 --> 00:13:15.671
Yeah.

00:13:15.711 --> 00:13:19.916
And the patterns are, you know, just to explain kind of what a pattern is as well.

00:13:20.015 --> 00:13:30.409
So a pattern is like a sequence of notes, you know, like a repeated pattern that you might play over, you know, over some bars that maybe either sort of shifts the time a little bit between the bars, doesn't it?

00:13:30.490 --> 00:13:36.597
Or it kind of repeats the pattern in like adjacent notes, you know, different approaches, but it's that sort of thing, isn't it?

00:13:36.618 --> 00:13:38.600
So that's something that, you know, you use quite a bit, isn't it?

00:13:38.660 --> 00:13:42.285
So, you know, did you deliberately sort of practice specific patterns to put in there?

00:13:42.850 --> 00:13:44.010
It depends on the song.

00:13:44.491 --> 00:13:53.881
I made a record a few years ago, about five years ago, and the title of the record was Ride the One, which refers to playing one chord, which is very common in blues.

00:13:54.523 --> 00:14:00.409
Bo Diddley or John Lee Hooker or Fred McDowell, just the hypnotic repetitions.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:14:11.778 --> 00:14:17.591
And so on that record, when I wrote the songs, many of the guitar parts, I just said, this is the guitar part and you play that.

00:14:18.013 --> 00:14:20.860
It'll be played from start to finish, that repeating riff.

00:14:21.341 --> 00:14:23.687
And then it'd be another one to a counter part.

00:14:24.229 --> 00:14:26.474
And I wanted it just to be very repetitive.

00:14:26.934 --> 00:14:27.756
This song still has...

00:14:28.193 --> 00:14:34.663
goes through stages or gears for, you know, first, second, third year, or there are chordal inversions and things like that.

00:14:34.724 --> 00:14:37.708
But I like the, the effective repetition.

00:14:38.109 --> 00:14:47.563
So I suppose some of the patterns and as well, their habits, you know, there are a lot of fantastic harmonic players who are so technically sophisticated.

00:14:47.604 --> 00:15:07.937
I wouldn't say that I'm, I have a lot of tricks or do things, you know, in the high register that are, or whatever that are, showpiece type playing I tend to play pretty somewhat understated and play inside the song I'm not a really great narrative player all the time or a momentum player as compared to some harmonicas that I've seen

00:15:08.337 --> 00:15:27.658
Yeah I think your use of harmonicas again that word judicious isn't it you make it fit nice with the song a lot of the time so let's talk through your music career the band you were associated with certainly in your early years was the Sidemen so Paul Riddick and the Sidemen yeah so was this your first sort of major band I think you formed in 1990

00:15:28.019 --> 00:15:40.687
yes it was I was sitting in with bands in Toronto here and there and I lived outside of about an hour away but I met a fella guitar player at one of those at a gig and He and I got together.

00:15:40.707 --> 00:15:42.350
His name is Kyle Ferguson.

00:15:42.711 --> 00:15:45.274
He's a great guitar player, and we played two nights ago.

00:15:45.554 --> 00:15:47.839
We do a duo act, and he plays my band presently.

00:15:48.058 --> 00:15:50.763
We've been playing together for 31 years, I guess.

00:15:51.104 --> 00:15:57.333
We were given the opportunity to open up for James Cotton at a bar called the El Macombo in Toronto as a duo.

00:15:57.955 --> 00:15:59.898
We learned 10 songs, covers.

00:16:00.339 --> 00:16:02.241
We practiced really hard.

00:16:02.658 --> 00:16:08.190
and went and did the gig, and we opened up for Cotton, and we got a standing ovation, and it went really well.

00:16:08.851 --> 00:16:10.134
We didn't know what to expect, really.

00:16:10.514 --> 00:16:14.965
So we quickly put a band together, and then that band found great success.

00:16:15.326 --> 00:16:19.434
We played with tremendous energy, and our tempos were fast.

00:16:19.836 --> 00:16:25.155
Both Kyle and I had a tendency to really drive the grooves and drive the songs hard.

00:16:25.456 --> 00:16:28.942
And that made us very popular in Toronto for a number of years.

00:16:29.042 --> 00:16:31.426
We had a band that was really on fire.

00:16:32.046 --> 00:16:36.913
It wasn't something that we tried to create consciously, and we really took it for granted.

00:16:37.033 --> 00:16:42.642
Casually, we didn't have great aspirations to be famous or anything like that, but we were pretty successful.

00:16:42.662 --> 00:16:47.429
And when we listened to the old recordings, I get out of breath just hearing them.

00:16:48.071 --> 00:16:50.134
Kyle was into Johnny Winter at that time.

00:16:50.562 --> 00:16:51.625
He's not as much now.

00:16:51.664 --> 00:16:54.370
We did some Johnny, and we did Little Walter.

00:17:06.240 --> 00:17:08.726
James Cotton, Muddy.

00:17:09.794 --> 00:17:13.659
Yeah, because obviously as you progressed, you started writing your own songs, it became very important.

00:17:14.420 --> 00:17:19.865
But with the Sidemen, again, I think one of your most popular songs was Smokehouse.

00:17:20.406 --> 00:17:24.351
And this is an example of you using a lot of delay in your harmonica.

00:17:24.432 --> 00:17:28.537
It's very common for you to use lots of delay when you're playing.

00:17:29.718 --> 00:17:30.719
I have in the last few years.

00:17:30.858 --> 00:17:40.094
I did a harmonica workshop in Toronto one time, and the guy Sugar Ray Norcia said, was there and he said, I use a delay pedal, just a little bit of delay.

00:17:40.375 --> 00:17:41.156
So I bought one.

00:17:41.878 --> 00:17:52.064
They tend to enrich the tone of the note, but I think through the delay, there's a compound, like the note gets somewhat fattened up through being layered somewhat.

00:18:06.849 --> 00:18:08.412
I really like that tone.

00:18:08.813 --> 00:18:13.179
I also just like the way in which it creates space and landscape.

00:18:13.499 --> 00:18:17.904
And so one of the big albums, probably the biggest album with Sidemen was Rattleback.

00:18:18.086 --> 00:18:21.309
And was this your last album with them?

00:18:21.410 --> 00:18:25.655
You were nominated for a Juno, which was the Canadian Grammy.

00:18:26.176 --> 00:18:35.710
Yes, we had made a record in 91, which was, we had a few original songs, I think three or four out of 10, maybe 15.

00:18:35.905 --> 00:18:41.432
And then we did another one called When the Sun Goes Down, which was also nominated for a Juno in 95.

00:18:41.992 --> 00:18:45.376
It was produced by Joe Louis Walker, which was an interesting experience.

00:18:45.416 --> 00:18:47.259
And then we made another one after that.

00:18:47.318 --> 00:18:54.488
But all those three records, the sound, there was something about the way they were engineered that never seemed satisfying.

00:18:54.508 --> 00:18:59.993
And I think at that time, there was a sort of preoccupation with close-miking things.

00:19:00.013 --> 00:19:01.856
I didn't think they sounded very good.

00:19:01.896 --> 00:19:02.938
I never liked it.

00:19:03.170 --> 00:19:04.192
any of those records.

00:19:04.593 --> 00:19:13.067
But then when we rattled back with a producer from Canada called Colin Linden, who now lives in Nashville, and he's very much associated with T-Bone Burnett.

00:19:13.107 --> 00:19:14.450
He played in Bob Dylan's band.

00:19:14.971 --> 00:19:19.599
He's one of the great blues authorities in the world and knows how to record music.

00:19:20.060 --> 00:19:22.806
So we all of a sudden had this record that sounded great.

00:19:23.170 --> 00:19:26.472
I went to him and asked him how to make a good sounding record cheaply.

00:19:26.772 --> 00:19:30.516
He said, well, hire me to do it, write all the songs, and I'll produce it.

00:19:30.717 --> 00:19:34.940
So I realized that this was an opportunity for me to make a great record, a great sounding record.

00:19:35.300 --> 00:19:38.282
And so I worked very hard on the songs for about four months.

00:19:38.663 --> 00:19:42.527
Every day, I wrote every day, and I re-entered listening to blues.

00:19:42.707 --> 00:20:04.010
I used the Alan Lomax Field Recordings, the Library of Congress Field Recordings, as my main source of music, blues inspiration, sort of as a way to avoid getting too close to little bolter muddy waters whoever and that record worked out to be somewhat changed my life because it was it was good and it was recognized and it was a great thing

00:20:04.571 --> 00:20:11.261
a song off this album was a i'm a criminal which i believe was used for a a coca-cola commercial in the u.s that's right

00:20:14.165 --> 00:20:14.205
so

00:20:22.625 --> 00:20:25.730
So that got you some notice, did it?

00:20:26.231 --> 00:20:26.451
Yes.

00:20:26.551 --> 00:20:30.397
I mean, I was with a small record company and they didn't solicit this.

00:20:30.577 --> 00:20:43.738
I think whatever the ad agency was for Coca-Cola, they probably Googled songs about criminal because the premise of the commercial was a guy filling up his cup at a store off of a fountain.

00:20:44.239 --> 00:20:47.023
And then it overflows and he takes a couple of sips and fills it up again.

00:20:47.084 --> 00:20:51.230
So it's saying sip stealing is not illegal anymore.

00:20:51.362 --> 00:20:56.011
So they found me somehow, used it, but your name's not attached to it.

00:20:56.051 --> 00:20:57.596
So it isn't like a lot of people.

00:20:57.615 --> 00:21:01.865
That commercial ran for a year and was popular, and it was only played in the States.

00:21:02.326 --> 00:21:09.622
My only measure of its effect on recognition came from someone on YouTube put together...

00:21:09.986 --> 00:21:24.765
took the song from my album and put a little video together and it was seen a bunch of times and there was a few people covered the song and made videos of themselves covering it i made a lot of money from the commercial itself which was good enough but it didn't really translate into any kind of recognition

00:21:25.105 --> 00:21:29.130
did this then lead you on to touring the u.s uh sort of on the back

00:21:29.431 --> 00:21:37.263
that album was nominated for a thing called a blues music or wc handy award which now are the Blues Music Awards.

00:21:37.503 --> 00:21:38.305
They changed the name.

00:21:39.006 --> 00:21:40.768
So it was nominated as Best New Artist.

00:21:41.388 --> 00:21:45.634
An agent in Missouri contacted me and said, let's go.

00:21:45.653 --> 00:21:53.242
So I went, and they were good agents, and I played in the States for about three years all the time.

00:21:53.262 --> 00:22:00.211
I would go down for six weeks, come home for two weeks, go down for six weeks, come home for two weeks, and just played constantly everywhere.

00:22:00.231 --> 00:22:05.298
I went through quite a few different band members because of the amount of playing, but it was a lot of fun.

00:22:05.538 --> 00:22:10.305
I was playing small venues and some festivals, but it was just gritty old grinding.

00:22:10.705 --> 00:22:14.131
But I wanted to do that at the time and it was fun.

00:22:14.511 --> 00:22:17.175
But the commercial wasn't directly related to that.

00:22:17.576 --> 00:22:20.140
It may have even come up after that period of my life.

00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:28.353
So was this the start of you, then your solo career and then moving away from the Sidemen, you're saying you were playing with different musicians in the US?

00:22:28.712 --> 00:22:32.578
Well, prior to that Rattlebag record, we were just the Sidemen.

00:22:32.778 --> 00:22:44.787
But when I made the Rattlebag, My band, everybody had kids and stuff, so I kind of had to, and I did too, but the rest of them were more responsible than me, although my family's forgiven me now.

00:22:45.147 --> 00:22:47.250
So I had to find myself within it.

00:22:48.230 --> 00:22:50.212
And then after that, I've just been under my own name.

00:22:50.673 --> 00:22:51.073
Sure, yeah.

00:22:51.093 --> 00:22:54.557
And then I think the first album you released under your own name was Villanelle.

00:22:54.817 --> 00:22:55.237
That's right.

00:22:55.277 --> 00:23:00.962
And that was also produced by, I continued to have a relationship with Colin Linden for three other records.

00:23:01.323 --> 00:23:14.633
I did one called Villanelle, one called Sugarbird, Then there was kind of a collection of greatest hits, which existed because my record company got a grant to help submit songs for potentially getting into films.

00:23:15.093 --> 00:23:18.636
And then I did a recording for a Johnny Cash tribute record.

00:23:18.717 --> 00:23:22.461
I sang a Johnny Cash song in which Colin did produce that as well.

00:23:34.561 --> 00:23:42.912
So we had a fruitful few years where he lived in Nashville, still does, and I would go down there and we would write and record in Nashville.

00:23:43.432 --> 00:23:45.255
So I made Villanelle was the first one, yes.

00:23:45.796 --> 00:23:48.500
Yeah, and you mentioned the Johnny Cash tribute one there.

00:23:48.539 --> 00:23:49.701
So that's the Train of Love.

00:23:49.721 --> 00:23:50.142
That's right.

00:23:50.382 --> 00:23:53.346
Which you're playing a kind of rhythmical train approach to the harmonica.

00:23:53.365 --> 00:23:55.208
So that's a Johnny Cash song, is it?

00:23:55.448 --> 00:23:58.231
It's a Johnny Cash song and it was to be a blues tribute.

00:23:58.271 --> 00:24:03.097
So I tried to base the rhythm of it on Fred McDowell.

00:24:03.362 --> 00:24:10.854
And at the beginning of the recording, you can hear us listening to the Fred McDowell sample, which we were looping, and then the groove kind of came out of that.

00:24:11.595 --> 00:24:18.505
So the Villanelle album, starting from there, is this where you were writing your own songs on the Rattlebag album as well, were you?

00:24:19.145 --> 00:24:27.799
Yes, I co-wrote the music with Kyle Ferguson, and the other ones I co-wrote with Colin Linden.

00:24:28.099 --> 00:24:31.625
What I would bring were the lyrics and also...

00:24:32.034 --> 00:24:38.000
a baseline or a snippet of something from which we would take that piece and flesh it out.

00:24:38.640 --> 00:24:57.298
With Colin, who's an encyclopedic musician and is a fantastic memory for everything I could say, I'd like this to be a combination of these two or three artists, like maybe some, you know, Sun House and some Blind Molly McTell and then Magic Sam.

00:24:57.718 --> 00:25:01.501
How would you collate those things into one sound?

00:25:01.794 --> 00:25:03.195
And he's capable of doing that.

00:25:03.936 --> 00:25:07.162
And we would take those things and sort of collage the thing together.

00:25:07.663 --> 00:25:08.644
I certainly wrote the lyrics.

00:25:08.663 --> 00:25:16.055
And during the recording of Rattlebag, I had bought an anthology of poetry called The Rattlebag.

00:25:16.355 --> 00:25:17.897
And that's what the record is named for.

00:25:17.938 --> 00:25:19.881
Anthology of Poetry.

00:25:20.020 --> 00:25:24.728
It's put together by Seamus Heaney and Ted Hughes in the 70s sometime.

00:25:25.229 --> 00:25:26.691
And I had never really studied poetry.

00:25:27.332 --> 00:25:28.673
But I read this book and thought...

00:25:29.377 --> 00:25:30.499
You know, these are songs.

00:25:30.839 --> 00:25:34.423
I didn't know what made poetry poetry, what the rules were, determine its content.

00:25:35.023 --> 00:25:36.705
So I got some books on that.

00:25:37.205 --> 00:25:47.336
And I began to write using poem forms and poetic techniques as a way of both enriching my writing process.

00:25:47.798 --> 00:25:56.826
And because the poem forms are in a certain shape, that would determine the musical shape, which eventually took me away from 12 bars into whatever it might be.

00:25:57.708 --> 00:25:58.970
That was an interesting discovery.

00:25:59.554 --> 00:26:03.003
really changed the way that I write and focused it more.

00:26:03.365 --> 00:26:05.329
And I continue to use that.

00:26:06.153 --> 00:26:12.108
The last record I made out of 10 songs, six of them are based on formal poem forms.

00:26:12.642 --> 00:26:46.512
yeah and it's great saying your lyrics are available all to to download and view on your website yeah so you've got a kind of anthology of all your lyrics so it's great to hear that approach to songwriting as you say and then particularly sort of blues based music as well making them much more interesting i think sometimes you know people try to to apply poetry techniques sometimes it can come across you know as maybe a bit pretentious but that definitely doesn't happen with yours i think they come through great and the lyrics are you know are really interesting and i think you on sugarbird you you won a Maple Blues Award for Songwriter of the Year for that album.

00:26:46.834 --> 00:26:47.114
Yes.

00:26:48.256 --> 00:26:53.403
I don't enjoy intellectual music or literature or poetry.

00:26:53.423 --> 00:26:54.304
It's just not my thing.

00:26:54.344 --> 00:27:09.809
And so when you take the feeling and the sort of canon of blues lyrics and language and apply it within the formal sort of poem form thing, it helps you avoid sounding ridiculous.

00:27:10.391 --> 00:27:22.394
And so I just use the forms as a framework on which to hang and use what are pretty familiar feeling blues language and cadence.

00:27:23.175 --> 00:27:25.219
All these blues forms, they are invisible.

00:27:25.519 --> 00:27:30.750
I also try to make so when a person listens to the song, they're not going, oh, that's a villanelle.

00:27:31.041 --> 00:27:37.077
which is a poem form, or that's a this, or that's that, or he's using alliteration there, or he's doing this or that.

00:27:37.419 --> 00:27:38.762
You don't want that to be noticed.

00:27:39.505 --> 00:27:44.357
So I very much try to keep it sexy and not cerebral.

00:27:45.059 --> 00:27:45.801
I'm not that guy.

00:27:46.433 --> 00:27:47.035
Yeah, definitely.

00:27:47.075 --> 00:27:48.516
But, you know, again, it's very effective.

00:27:48.536 --> 00:27:51.198
So I noticed your song Devilment is one I picked out.

00:27:51.278 --> 00:27:56.021
It's got some Macbeth type references to cauldrons and things.

00:27:56.061 --> 00:28:14.317
That's something

00:28:14.337 --> 00:28:17.381
you were going for, that you say you're not trying to Oh,

00:28:17.401 --> 00:28:17.781
no, I don't.

00:28:18.082 --> 00:28:18.803
No, I don't.

00:28:18.884 --> 00:28:19.684
I never thought of that.

00:28:19.765 --> 00:28:23.470
But blues can be very inappropriate these days.

00:28:23.509 --> 00:28:29.638
Sexist and a lot of lines that are, you know, boom, boom, uncle of the lights isn't a very sentimental song.

00:28:30.200 --> 00:28:34.306
I think I was making the reference to someone being a witch without saying it straightforward.

00:28:36.348 --> 00:28:42.738
I'm quite conscious of the fact that I was echoing that kind of nasty sentiment, but doing it in a way that was a little funnier.

00:28:42.978 --> 00:28:45.099
almost commenting upon that itself.

00:28:45.381 --> 00:28:48.845
Well, definitely, yeah, you should be applauded for your use of thoughtful lyrics.

00:28:49.645 --> 00:28:52.888
You've been described as the poet laureate of Canadian blues.

00:28:53.450 --> 00:28:54.270
Where did that come from?

00:28:54.290 --> 00:28:57.674
Oh, that's just a record company trying to sell records, I think.

00:28:58.895 --> 00:29:00.077
Do you appreciate that title?

00:29:00.657 --> 00:29:02.559
Well, I certainly do.

00:29:02.760 --> 00:29:05.284
I'm proud of, sort of took my lyrics for granted.

00:29:05.304 --> 00:29:09.268
A few years ago, someone came to me and said, are your lyrics available online?

00:29:09.729 --> 00:29:10.910
And they only existed once.

00:29:11.105 --> 00:29:15.852
on paper, pencil and paper, you know, in my linen closet at home, stacked up in books.

00:29:15.932 --> 00:29:28.707
And so I took them out and had someone who could type them all out and then arrange them in kind of on the page into shapes that poems are presented.

00:29:28.747 --> 00:29:31.069
And I was pleased by what I wrote.

00:29:31.530 --> 00:29:37.758
And recently I wrote a bunch of poems on Facebook, all 10 songs I wrote.

00:29:38.082 --> 00:29:48.557
took a photograph of a typed sheet of the lyric and talked about the lyric, I suppose I'm pleased with the way that it's worked out using that approach.

00:29:49.157 --> 00:29:52.122
So I guess to be recognized, I wouldn't call myself a poet.

00:29:52.603 --> 00:29:53.743
I've never written poetry.

00:29:54.444 --> 00:29:55.226
I write lyrics.

00:29:55.906 --> 00:29:58.550
So it's a bit inaccurate in that way.

00:29:58.911 --> 00:30:00.574
I don't write poetry.

00:30:00.993 --> 00:30:01.934
I read a lot of it.

00:30:01.994 --> 00:30:02.715
I enjoy it.

00:30:02.796 --> 00:30:04.117
It's a thing to read some of it.

00:30:04.137 --> 00:30:06.240
I like reading about poetry.

00:30:06.820 --> 00:30:13.288
I just got a book called The Architecture of Poetry, which talks about all those, the nature of why it works and what it is.

00:30:13.930 --> 00:30:15.451
But I'm not a poet.

00:30:16.173 --> 00:30:27.664
But I think, you know, having read some of your lyrics on your website, I think they are definitely readable, which is, you know, you can just sit and read the lyrics and and enjoy them in that way, which is very satisfying, I think, for some.

00:30:28.125 --> 00:30:29.007
I think they're pretty good.

00:30:29.047 --> 00:30:38.903
And even in just analyzing them for this social media thing to draw attention to my new record, there's a naturalness to them that I guess I should be proud of.

00:30:40.386 --> 00:30:44.574
Here's a quick word from the podcast's new sponsor at Blows Me Away Productions.

00:30:46.458 --> 00:30:46.718
Blows Me Away

00:30:46.945 --> 00:30:49.489
Hey folks, this is Charlie Musselwhite.

00:30:49.509 --> 00:30:56.818
If you're in the amplified tone like I am, the best and only place to start is a microphone from Blows Me Away Productions.

00:30:57.319 --> 00:30:59.542
Check them out at blowsmeaway.com.

00:31:00.044 --> 00:31:01.405
You know I ain't lying.

00:31:03.367 --> 00:31:09.276
And so, yeah, so these albums you talked about, the Villanelle and Sugarbird, and definitely not conventionally blues albums, are they?

00:31:09.316 --> 00:31:13.922
There's a song on there, Block of Wood, which is probably your most traditional blues harp playing.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
...

00:31:20.258 --> 00:31:31.633
I was pleased on that song, Block of Wood, that I took the solo I did because I thought it was pretty authentic.

00:31:33.434 --> 00:31:39.923
And then in your next album, Wishbone, there's a song on there called Dancing in a Dream, which has a low harmonica.

00:31:40.084 --> 00:31:47.354
So you quite like the use of low harmonicas, you know, again, quite often with delay to really sort of give that wide atmospheric sound.

00:31:47.554 --> 00:31:49.695
Yes, I love the low harps.

00:31:49.996 --> 00:31:56.362
I have a song called Blue Wings, which when I recorded it, there was strings on it.

00:31:56.682 --> 00:32:03.608
I took the solo section, but I do a solo at the end in first position with a low A harp with a lot of delay.

00:32:03.648 --> 00:32:06.893
It's just this magnificent tone that comes out.

00:32:07.272 --> 00:32:09.234
It doesn't sound like a harmonica.

00:32:09.275 --> 00:32:12.077
It's just a beautiful, rich, deep sound.

00:32:16.481 --> 00:32:16.701
piano plays

00:32:22.178 --> 00:32:26.501
I don't ever play F harmonicas or E flat.

00:32:26.862 --> 00:32:28.723
As high as I go is D.

00:32:28.743 --> 00:32:34.249
I find the higher notes make me want to squint a little bit, you know.

00:32:34.569 --> 00:32:38.733
I like to play to have the tone be warm, the low harps.

00:32:38.753 --> 00:32:40.615
I use them occasionally.

00:32:40.756 --> 00:32:51.726
I mostly play A harps and C and G, D, B and A flat and all the ones up there, like not E, E flat.

00:32:51.938 --> 00:32:53.500
But I do have a low F.

00:32:53.779 --> 00:32:56.022
So none of my songs are in the key of C or very rarely.

00:32:56.824 --> 00:33:00.269
When I sit in with other people, most of their songs are in the key of C.

00:33:00.328 --> 00:33:04.094
So I'll play a B flat or a C or the low F.

00:33:04.535 --> 00:33:12.105
And then onto the album you mentioned, Ride the One, which you received your Juno Award for Best Blues Album in 2016.

00:33:12.184 --> 00:33:15.829
So has this been your most commercially successful album?

00:33:16.193 --> 00:33:21.779
I don't think commercially successful is the term I would ever use for anything I've ever done.

00:33:21.799 --> 00:33:24.162
I mean, the Juno Award was nice to get.

00:33:24.201 --> 00:33:28.826
I beat out some stiff competition, which was lucky, but it's a great record.

00:33:29.207 --> 00:33:36.654
And it was produced by another Colin named Colin Cripps, and he did Wishbone, and he's one of the great guitar players in Canada.

00:33:36.755 --> 00:33:39.357
And it was successful, somewhat.

00:33:39.377 --> 00:33:43.602
I mean, I just measure the success of it by whether the songs feel good to play.

00:33:43.842 --> 00:34:04.382
live and whether people like them you don't often play all the songs off a record you know like off of that one ralph rattlebag i play about six still all those years i never tire of them off of ride the one i play about five but it was successful to me as an extension of songwriting that experiment with writing the one was an interesting thing

00:34:04.903 --> 00:34:10.188
yeah and so one of the songs is shadows which has got a lot of harmonica on it's a real sort of driving harmonica

00:34:11.949 --> 00:34:12.030
song

00:34:21.954 --> 00:34:24.318
most popular song from the album on Spotify.

00:34:24.398 --> 00:34:26.320
So does that tell you something?

00:34:26.601 --> 00:34:29.385
I still play that song and it's fun to play.

00:34:30.726 --> 00:34:41.764
Oftentimes when I record these songs, as with the last most recent record, they're put together and I don't spend months or years playing them live before we record them.

00:34:42.244 --> 00:34:45.148
Oftentimes I And with Colin Linden, we would write the song.

00:34:45.168 --> 00:34:50.175
The version on the album is the first time I ever had sung the song in my life.

00:34:50.235 --> 00:34:51.297
I'd never sung it before.

00:34:51.838 --> 00:34:55.222
And that's the version, like the first take was the version we did.

00:34:55.264 --> 00:34:59.108
And it was the same on some of the songs and all these records.

00:34:59.650 --> 00:35:04.135
They were born and it's like, oh, nice to meet you.

00:35:04.556 --> 00:35:07.782
And then as time goes by, you get to know them as you would your children.

00:35:08.449 --> 00:35:13.557
Your most recent release, I think, is the Alive in Italia, which is a live album from Italy.

00:35:13.597 --> 00:35:17.563
I think it's been described as a love letter to Italy and your friends there.

00:35:17.923 --> 00:35:32.385
Yes, I was, I guess about 10 or 12 years ago, I had an agent in Hamburg and he used a band called The Gamblers who were from a town east of Genoa called Chiaveri in northern Italy.

00:35:32.925 --> 00:35:38.766
There was some big ash storm or something in the sky where we couldn't fly for hours a week or so.

00:35:39.327 --> 00:35:40.349
So we weren't able to rehearse.

00:35:40.668 --> 00:35:44.635
And I showed up to a gig in Belgium somewhere, and they nailed it.

00:35:45.275 --> 00:35:47.137
Every song, we'd never met.

00:35:47.478 --> 00:35:49.161
We met at Soundcheck.

00:35:49.641 --> 00:35:53.166
They became instant friends, and they're still beautiful friends of mine.

00:35:53.626 --> 00:35:58.233
And I've been able to go over to Italy, usually every 14 months or so.

00:35:58.733 --> 00:36:00.295
COVID, of course, has interrupted that.

00:36:00.777 --> 00:36:05.242
But I've had a long and great friendship and musical relationship with these guys.

00:36:05.282 --> 00:36:07.166
And I produced a record for them one time.

00:36:07.585 --> 00:36:08.626
They're a great band.

00:36:09.047 --> 00:36:16.056
And so my relationship to going to Italy is always just lovely and musically great.

00:36:16.297 --> 00:36:21.503
And they're beautiful people, these guys and their families and their friends.

00:36:21.583 --> 00:36:29.213
And so I've been very fortunate to have developed a happy time there.

00:36:37.346 --> 00:36:39.909
We're playing a gig, our little couple of gigs.

00:36:40.110 --> 00:36:42.074
I did like a two-week visit there.

00:36:42.894 --> 00:36:46.481
And I was playing with another couple of fellows from Canada who have their own band.

00:36:47.342 --> 00:36:53.692
We just recorded one of the shows in a beautiful little town up in the mountains in northern Italy.

00:36:54.472 --> 00:36:56.757
And I didn't really even pay attention to the fact that we were recording.

00:36:56.777 --> 00:36:59.121
I forgot that we even recorded it.

00:36:59.822 --> 00:37:04.670
And then during COVID, the bassist Gabrielle said, I've got this recording.

00:37:04.961 --> 00:37:09.110
He sent it to me and we had it mixed and it turned out to be great.

00:37:09.391 --> 00:37:10.393
So we released it.

00:37:10.914 --> 00:37:11.576
It is pretty good.

00:37:11.597 --> 00:37:13.300
It is really good, yeah.

00:37:13.621 --> 00:37:19.855
And one thing which is really great as a harmonica fan is there's quite a lot more harmonica on it because I think the songs are longer.

00:37:19.875 --> 00:37:21.297
You're taking sort of longer solos.

00:37:23.181 --> 00:37:23.262
Yeah.

00:37:33.858 --> 00:37:35.619
I play Harpo live.

00:37:35.721 --> 00:37:37.041
I play quite a bit.

00:37:37.061 --> 00:37:37.722
There's solos.

00:37:37.762 --> 00:37:38.985
We stretch things out.

00:37:39.666 --> 00:37:41.849
The recordings are somewhat clipped.

00:37:42.510 --> 00:37:45.293
You mentioned you've been working on a new album.

00:37:46.396 --> 00:37:47.657
When are you planning on releasing that?

00:37:48.257 --> 00:37:50.581
Well, I recorded it about a month ago.

00:37:50.621 --> 00:37:51.902
Recorded 10 songs.

00:38:06.818 --> 00:38:11.706
We need to still mix them, which took us five days to record the whole thing.

00:38:11.947 --> 00:38:14.090
It takes five or six days to mix it.

00:38:14.331 --> 00:38:16.755
So that has to be done sometime next month or so.

00:38:16.815 --> 00:38:17.697
I'm not sure exactly.

00:38:18.358 --> 00:38:24.409
And I'm sort of negotiating record labels who might be interested and pay for things.

00:38:26.092 --> 00:38:31.702
And the decision to make release records, they often have an agenda and a wisdom.

00:38:32.257 --> 00:38:33.378
that goes beyond mine.

00:38:33.539 --> 00:38:38.244
I had originally figured I'd just record it and mix it and put it out as soon as it was ready.

00:38:38.943 --> 00:38:40.726
But I imagine it's going to be in the spring.

00:38:41.467 --> 00:38:48.432
My emphasis is going to be hopefully on focusing its promotion and its touring on Europe.

00:38:49.293 --> 00:39:01.726
And that might be after this summer, like it could be a long game, like till 24, 23, I'm working on doing a bunch of festivals in Canada, but I'm not sure yet.

00:39:02.273 --> 00:39:04.635
It'll be released next year, hopefully in the springtime.

00:39:05.416 --> 00:39:05.657
Great.

00:39:05.677 --> 00:39:07.619
Well, hopefully I'll catch you when you're over in Europe.

00:39:07.679 --> 00:39:10.222
So you mentioned you touched on the financials there.

00:39:10.262 --> 00:39:15.688
It's a topic covered on this podcast quite a bit around, you know, albums don't make the money they used to do.

00:39:15.807 --> 00:39:20.592
So, you know, is that, you know, making you think twice about releasing new albums?

00:39:21.293 --> 00:39:23.175
Not thinking twice, but being able to.

00:39:23.896 --> 00:39:29.061
Just because we came out of COVID and I had released the Italian record during that time.

00:39:29.474 --> 00:39:31.878
Even to promote that, we weren't able to do it properly.

00:39:31.918 --> 00:39:36.423
That's something I think the Italian record is still as yet to be properly promoted.

00:39:36.443 --> 00:39:39.027
And that may be next year if we tour Italy.

00:39:39.047 --> 00:39:47.239
I just, in order to support my applying for next year's gigs, I felt I should have a new record.

00:39:47.641 --> 00:39:49.043
So I didn't have any financing for it.

00:39:49.103 --> 00:39:51.447
And the one label did not finance.

00:39:51.927 --> 00:39:58.336
And in Canada, there is a government grant system which everyone uses to make their records.

00:39:58.416 --> 00:40:02.672
And it's kind of allows there to be a music industry here.

00:40:03.253 --> 00:40:07.016
And you can apply for recording grants, touring grants, writing grants.

00:40:07.637 --> 00:40:08.579
You don't always get them.

00:40:08.818 --> 00:40:09.719
It's still a lottery.

00:40:09.960 --> 00:40:11.922
And I had applied for a few and did not get them.

00:40:11.961 --> 00:40:13.684
So I just wanted to make this record.

00:40:13.724 --> 00:40:18.387
So I just went into a studio without any money, hoping that I'd find it somehow a month ago.

00:40:18.427 --> 00:40:24.052
And it was$5,000 Canadian dollars to make the record in five days.

00:40:24.653 --> 00:40:26.536
The mixing is another almost six.

00:40:27.056 --> 00:40:28.677
That doesn't include the manufacturing.

00:40:29.090 --> 00:40:31.532
Although whether to manufacture these days is a question.

00:40:31.572 --> 00:40:35.577
Although when you're doing festival gigs, people do like a souvenir CDs.

00:40:36.418 --> 00:40:44.226
I'm probably going to make some vinyl, but you know, it's going to be, they cost 15 to$20,000 to make a record in Canadian funds, which is a lot of money.

00:40:44.746 --> 00:40:46.469
And I haven't got any support.

00:40:46.528 --> 00:40:51.594
So I have recently been doing a crowdfunding using a thing called GoFundMe.

00:40:52.135 --> 00:40:57.981
But I've had it through creating this content about the songs that I got the 5,000 in the last month.

00:40:58.273 --> 00:40:59.335
to pay for the recording.

00:40:59.835 --> 00:41:06.943
And then I may continue to negotiate talking to other labels who they have pre-approval for the grant system.

00:41:07.364 --> 00:41:09.987
In any case, yes, it's very expensive and it's cost prohibitive.

00:41:10.007 --> 00:41:13.429
And I don't sell much merch or much hard copy.

00:41:13.891 --> 00:41:15.192
I've run out of it.

00:41:15.251 --> 00:41:18.835
I'm sold out of most of what I have and which is unfortunate.

00:41:19.175 --> 00:41:20.056
It's not like it used to be.

00:41:20.077 --> 00:41:22.159
We used to sell a lot of stuff, a lot of CDs.

00:41:22.360 --> 00:41:24.222
And now it just, people don't want them.

00:41:24.242 --> 00:41:28.159
They're It doesn't exist as technology, and Spotify has replaced that.

00:41:28.599 --> 00:41:34.188
Being a musician, I've never, with the exception of the Coke commercial, which was a blip, it's a pretty modest life.

00:41:34.509 --> 00:41:37.492
And so I'm used to it, and I don't question it, and I like it.

00:41:37.552 --> 00:41:51.253
I mean, despite each month paying the rent is always a bit of a gamble and a risk, each month I get to play five or six times, and I'm able to live the most beautiful life in the world playing music.

00:41:51.333 --> 00:41:53.536
It's phenomenally fantastic.

00:41:53.797 --> 00:41:54.237
It makes me...

00:41:54.402 --> 00:41:55.782
living in poverty seem okay.

00:41:56.344 --> 00:41:58.887
I'm making a line answer to the idea of making a recording.

00:41:58.907 --> 00:42:03.271
It is, I think for everybody, not the same as it might have once been.

00:42:03.710 --> 00:42:05.572
But it's like a, you know, it's a marker, isn't it?

00:42:05.612 --> 00:42:07.155
Making a recording is something to work to.

00:42:07.235 --> 00:42:09.737
It also helps you promote you and get you to us, doesn't it?

00:42:10.237 --> 00:42:17.284
Yeah, it's a beautiful process in itself and writing the songs and putting them together, it's really fun because it's so focused.

00:42:17.865 --> 00:42:19.706
It's an art unto itself.

00:42:20.088 --> 00:42:29.612
The recorded versions of songs, they are not like live, but you're allowed to control it so much and manipulate it and dress it up and make it fancy with this and that.

00:42:29.791 --> 00:42:30.853
So it's a lot of fun.

00:42:31.173 --> 00:42:38.523
So another thing you do is you've created some really good music videos and quite well produced sort of music videos.

00:42:38.923 --> 00:42:40.146
You know, how have you put those together?

00:42:40.186 --> 00:42:41.788
Is that something you've used to promote yourself?

00:42:42.389 --> 00:42:50.380
I had, in the process of promoting the Ride the One record, hired a small crew in Canada called Southern Souls.

00:42:51.181 --> 00:42:54.856
They show up and They set up sound recording and the film.

00:42:55.197 --> 00:42:55.978
They're good at what they do.

00:42:56.518 --> 00:43:00.942
And I have a little venue that I play at every week where I did some shooting in there.

00:43:00.963 --> 00:43:02.523
It's sort of an evocative little room.

00:43:03.005 --> 00:43:06.608
And did a couple of videos which sounded good and looked good.

00:43:07.007 --> 00:43:10.010
And then during COVID, I hired some other people to do this.

00:43:10.431 --> 00:43:12.414
I used to play at this gig every Wednesday night.

00:43:12.773 --> 00:43:13.614
And then it was gone.

00:43:13.655 --> 00:43:20.541
So I recorded, I think, six or seven songs in a day with my band in this venue.

00:43:20.898 --> 00:43:25.143
And it was well recorded and well mixed and produced.

00:43:25.664 --> 00:43:29.909
And then I would release them each Wednesday at the same time as I would have started playing.

00:43:29.929 --> 00:43:38.820
So it simulated our live show and wasn't a live stream, which tended to be a little sound-wise primitive.

00:43:38.902 --> 00:43:42.626
And I just wanted to get it all done to get the band together.

00:43:42.646 --> 00:43:44.027
So I did those videos.

00:43:44.108 --> 00:43:45.030
But they're pretty good.

00:43:58.690 --> 00:44:08.233
I hired the Southern Souls guys recently just to promote a new version of a band, which I was trying to hustle.

00:44:08.914 --> 00:44:11.621
And then when this record comes out, I'll make some videos for it.

00:44:11.661 --> 00:44:13.184
But I'm glad that I have them.

00:44:13.485 --> 00:44:14.909
They're pretty good.

00:44:15.777 --> 00:44:16.438
Yeah, they're great.

00:44:16.478 --> 00:44:18.360
Yeah, I'll put links to them on the podcast page.

00:44:18.400 --> 00:44:19.320
People can check them out.

00:44:19.362 --> 00:44:20.543
Yeah, really interesting.

00:44:20.583 --> 00:44:26.088
And so another thing you've helped set up is the Cobalt Prize for Contemporary Blues Composition.

00:44:26.108 --> 00:44:27.789
Is that something that you've created?

00:44:27.849 --> 00:44:33.215
And now this prize is available to promote the growth and vitality of blues music.

00:44:33.355 --> 00:44:35.336
One time, I think I was a bit drunk.

00:44:35.858 --> 00:44:40.181
I came home and I was sitting around thinking about blues music and thinking about what I do.

00:44:40.282 --> 00:44:43.045
And this would be about six or seven years ago.

00:44:43.065 --> 00:44:44.025
And I wrote...

00:44:44.418 --> 00:45:01.338
a little piece, which I called Blues is a Beautiful Landscape, and talked about the idea that as an art form, it's not just a collection of artists that exist, the iconic artists from which create what we think of as blues.

00:45:01.958 --> 00:45:05.983
And oftentimes, if you were a blues musician, you're going to play like B.B.

00:45:06.003 --> 00:45:09.208
King or like Little Walter or like R.L.

00:45:09.228 --> 00:45:23.898
Burnside or whoever, that you would go to an individual and having learned their Their songs or their style go from there, where I've tried to create the image of that whole genre as being a place from which they emerged.

00:45:24.498 --> 00:45:27.621
And I'm like, why don't we travel to that place from which they emerged?

00:45:27.983 --> 00:45:29.264
That's the feeling place.

00:45:29.324 --> 00:45:34.490
I'm not talking about an archetypal Mississippi, but a musical place.

00:45:34.791 --> 00:45:43.742
Those notes, the flat sevens, the blues notes, the blues feelings, the grooves, just the whole entirety of it, if it were to be an idea.

00:45:44.065 --> 00:45:45.487
And I used the word landscape.

00:45:45.949 --> 00:45:49.894
So you could think, I'm going to take this side road to this place no one has been.

00:45:50.376 --> 00:45:53.079
And I'm going to write from that place.

00:45:53.400 --> 00:45:57.186
And so I wrote that speech or that statement and put it on Facebook.

00:45:57.226 --> 00:45:58.847
And people liked it.

00:45:58.907 --> 00:46:01.773
And actually, there's a video of me saying it.

00:46:02.072 --> 00:46:07.862
The response was positive to the idea that one should be creative somehow or explore the idea.

00:46:08.443 --> 00:46:13.150
And so I considered having to encourage people in songwriting with a prize to write.

00:46:13.378 --> 00:46:48.824
address this idea and it's sort of a difficult idea to express like when i wrote the i wrote some sort of instructions as to what this is all about it's pretty abstract but the result was i had some money and i gave a thousand dollar prize for first prize and two lots of 250 for a second and third runners up and hired a jury to review these songs and hired a person to collate all the submissions And we got a hundred submissions of people who wrote songs specifically or had written songs they thought might suit it for this idea.

00:46:48.844 --> 00:46:51.367
And it was rewarding.

00:46:51.407 --> 00:46:58.538
And they were awarded a thing called the Maple Blues Awards, which is a Canadian blues award ceremony.

00:46:59.199 --> 00:47:01.902
I talked them into helping me present it.

00:47:02.603 --> 00:47:03.905
And it went on until COVID.

00:47:03.945 --> 00:47:07.030
And then during COVID, I had some trouble in finding the financing.

00:47:07.070 --> 00:47:11.007
So it's presently on hold, unfortunately, but I'm probably going to bring it back again.

00:47:11.047 --> 00:47:13.552
It was just to try and people do it naturally anyway.

00:47:13.572 --> 00:47:19.621
And I think the blues is to great extent, everyone's doing what I'm doing and exploring this and exploring that.

00:47:19.641 --> 00:47:24.568
Like I didn't mean to suggest that no one was doing it, but it was just a fun way of saying, why not?

00:47:25.208 --> 00:47:26.150
Yeah, no, good effort.

00:47:26.170 --> 00:47:27.592
Hopefully you can resurrect that.

00:47:27.652 --> 00:47:33.072
So, um, And some of your music's been used in different films and TV shows as well, yeah.

00:47:33.112 --> 00:47:36.137
So we talked about your Coca-Cola advert.

00:47:36.157 --> 00:47:42.268
You've been filming two If By The Sea and also the TV Dawson's Creek.

00:47:42.288 --> 00:47:45.373
You've appeared, so you've had some exposure there.

00:47:45.652 --> 00:47:52.664
The people, the music directors of film and TV, that's a business in and of itself.

00:47:53.324 --> 00:48:03.757
And I've been lucky enough to have a few people who like my material and use me when they're making a pitch to film and TV to have used my material.

00:48:04.318 --> 00:48:05.501
And so I've been lucky.

00:48:05.961 --> 00:48:07.425
It comes along sometimes.

00:48:08.065 --> 00:48:13.494
The last one, I think, was a show called Hap and Leonard, which was a Netflix show.

00:48:13.936 --> 00:48:16.480
And they chose a song, I think the song Villanelle.

00:48:16.500 --> 00:48:28.842
¶¶ Oh, sing your song, a love so

00:48:28.862 --> 00:48:28.961
sweet.

00:48:28.981 --> 00:48:29.702
It's difficult.

00:48:29.742 --> 00:48:31.786
I don't often solicit that work.

00:48:32.186 --> 00:48:35.150
Because every time there's a new production, there's a new possibility.

00:48:35.530 --> 00:48:40.277
But the likelihood of it being a production which requires a blues song is slim.

00:48:40.798 --> 00:48:41.820
But it's still possible.

00:48:42.221 --> 00:48:48.530
So occasionally these things come along which have a bluesy film or TV bluesy feel and you're in the running.

00:48:49.409 --> 00:48:51.632
But it's always nice because they pay a bit of money.

00:48:52.434 --> 00:48:58.023
So a question I ask each time, Paul, is if you had 10 minutes to practice, what would you spend those 10 minutes doing?

00:48:58.644 --> 00:49:00.807
Well, you know, there's certain things.

00:49:00.947 --> 00:49:13.146
I tend to have my habits, of course, and I still enjoy what I, the vocabulary that I have seems to express things efficiently for me and satisfyingly.

00:49:13.467 --> 00:49:25.447
But I think to work out some new melodic parts or Just try to find things I haven't done before with the notes, new patterns that I could add into the existing vocabulary.

00:49:25.467 --> 00:49:31.518
So I think it would be a case of just thinking melodically as though I were playing on a piano.

00:49:31.538 --> 00:49:33.581
What if I go this note, that note?

00:49:33.954 --> 00:49:35.195
then where would we go from that?

00:49:35.617 --> 00:49:39.503
Just to expand my vocabulary that way.

00:49:39.583 --> 00:49:58.974
If it were to be something productive, the other thing I'd like to do is to just play rhythm harmonica until I've reached a meditative state from breathing that way.

00:50:03.010 --> 00:50:05.914
You do play a little chromatic harmonica, don't you?

00:50:05.954 --> 00:50:10.842
There's a song called Luna, Moth and Butterfly where you play some chromatic, but it's mainly in the studio, is it?

00:50:11.204 --> 00:50:12.606
Yeah, mostly in the studio.

00:50:12.947 --> 00:50:15.271
I'm not very good at, I find, micing them a little.

00:50:15.411 --> 00:50:19.818
It's like, you know, it's like pushing that big canoe around on a microphone.

00:50:20.199 --> 00:50:22.782
I've never been that good at it.

00:50:23.284 --> 00:50:25.568
I'm not super fast on the thing, but I can play it.

00:50:28.974 --> 00:50:29.054
Yeah.

00:50:40.961 --> 00:50:45.387
And I do play in third position on the diatonic harps a fair bit.

00:50:45.666 --> 00:50:47.588
I play in first, second and third primarily.

00:50:47.628 --> 00:50:49.972
I do use it when I'm recording, occasionally.

00:50:50.371 --> 00:50:56.559
I didn't on the last record and I should have because I did a song in third position on a C harp and I just didn't have it with me.

00:50:56.978 --> 00:50:57.278
Damn it.

00:50:58.561 --> 00:50:59.621
I love the sound of them though.

00:51:00.061 --> 00:51:03.306
To me it sounds like New York City on that thing, you know.

00:51:04.166 --> 00:51:06.009
What brand of harmonicas do you like to play?

00:51:06.548 --> 00:51:07.190
I play the...

00:51:07.585 --> 00:51:18.400
Hohner marine bands, the crossovers and marine band deluxe, and then the Thunderbirds or just low marine bands for the low harps.

00:51:19.061 --> 00:51:25.070
I've always played marine bands, but now they've improved them with the deluxe and the crossover.

00:51:25.110 --> 00:51:25.612
They're great.

00:51:25.952 --> 00:51:29.898
And I get them serviced so that I don't have to buy new ones so often.

00:51:30.398 --> 00:51:31.981
And do you play any different tunings?

00:51:32.460 --> 00:51:32.641
No.

00:51:32.822 --> 00:51:32.862
No.

00:51:33.090 --> 00:51:34.271
What about any overblows?

00:51:34.672 --> 00:51:36.715
No, no, I never have done that.

00:51:36.856 --> 00:51:42.284
I've never been particularly fond of the tone of that sound, although I love the stuff that's been played.

00:51:42.364 --> 00:51:46.871
And there's a guy in Canada, Carlos Del Junco, who's one of the great virtuoso of that.

00:51:46.931 --> 00:51:53.039
And it's thrilling to see someone play Bach on the harmonica, just that it can be done.

00:51:53.159 --> 00:51:54.141
I love it.

00:51:54.442 --> 00:51:58.548
But I still haven't finished with just the vocabulary I have yet.

00:51:58.989 --> 00:52:01.974
I'm just, honestly, the few notes that I do play...

00:52:02.369 --> 00:52:08.697
which don't include tunings or just the standard notes on the harp, however many there are.

00:52:08.737 --> 00:52:12.740
The dozen notes with the bends, I'm not done with them yet.

00:52:13.280 --> 00:52:14.501
And what about your embouchure?

00:52:14.802 --> 00:52:17.846
Do you like to use tongue blocking or puckering or anything else?

00:52:18.447 --> 00:52:24.753
I'm very much a tongue blocking player and that would be constant within what I do.

00:52:26.034 --> 00:52:29.358
I find that it both enriches the tones and puts you in two places at once.

00:52:29.858 --> 00:52:34.306
So you can move quickly and simply, you know, from here to there.

00:52:34.326 --> 00:52:45.505
I recently was typing out lyrics to my songs and I was typing with two fingers, but then when someone showed me how to type with four fingers, your fingers are all an inch away from the keys.

00:52:45.885 --> 00:52:47.548
And that's the same as tongue blocking.

00:52:47.949 --> 00:52:54.440
You can play quickly, like you can go, and more smoothly than if you just did it with playing one note at a time.

00:52:55.233 --> 00:53:01.282
Equipment-wise, I mean, amplifiers, I was reading that you like to play two 1995 Fender Pro Juniors.

00:53:01.302 --> 00:53:03.244
Is that still your setup with amps?

00:53:03.525 --> 00:53:08.710
Yes, I got those recently because I play a small gig and we play very quietly.

00:53:08.751 --> 00:53:17.422
And I saw on one of these online markets here called Kijiji, I don't know if they have that near, but, you know, stuff being sold.

00:53:17.963 --> 00:53:22.068
I looked up Pro Junior and there was this blonde Tolex Pro Junior.

00:53:22.088 --> 00:53:23.289
And so I bought it.

00:53:23.650 --> 00:53:24.690
And it was pretty cheap.

00:53:24.791 --> 00:53:28.775
And a friend of mine had some vintage tubes from the 60s and we switched them into it.

00:53:28.835 --> 00:53:33.739
And then I saw another one, the same color and same amp.

00:53:34.161 --> 00:53:34.820
And I bought that.

00:53:35.222 --> 00:53:36.182
So I pair them up.

00:53:36.702 --> 00:53:43.110
I use a delayed pedal called a El Capistan and it's got left and right outs.

00:53:43.731 --> 00:53:46.833
So I run the outs into the two small amps.

00:53:47.193 --> 00:53:50.818
Oftentimes you get a lot of buzz or you can get a polarity.

00:53:51.266 --> 00:53:53.489
And this little pedal totally eliminates that.

00:53:54.030 --> 00:53:56.092
And I set them as far apart as I can.

00:53:56.112 --> 00:53:58.856
When I'm on the stage, I'll put them six feet or eight feet apart.

00:53:59.257 --> 00:54:02.121
And it really creates a great stereo sound.

00:54:02.601 --> 00:54:08.309
And the volume of my band, with some gig exceptions, they managed to keep up quite well.

00:54:08.869 --> 00:54:10.733
And they got a real nice, rich tone.

00:54:11.173 --> 00:54:15.760
I used to use a Fender Bassman reissue, but I love these little things and they look good too.

00:54:16.420 --> 00:54:20.005
So you don't use a big amp now, you use these two exclusively?

00:54:20.418 --> 00:54:20.778
I do.

00:54:21.278 --> 00:54:22.942
I might need to use a bigger amplifier.

00:54:22.961 --> 00:54:25.226
Sometimes if I go to a festival, you know, they've got a backline.

00:54:25.266 --> 00:54:28.150
I'll end up using whatever they have.

00:54:29.373 --> 00:54:35.001
Microphone-wise, I understand you like a sort of a Shure 57, sort of a clean sound.

00:54:35.021 --> 00:54:35.983
You don't use bullet mics.

00:54:36.543 --> 00:54:43.275
No, I've been using a Beta 57 for quite a long time, and I play that through the amps.

00:54:43.576 --> 00:54:44.617
I have a little pedal...

00:54:45.121 --> 00:54:46.663
I think it's a company called Wolf.

00:54:47.043 --> 00:54:47.543
Lone Wolf.

00:54:47.623 --> 00:54:49.306
Yes, it's a little crunchy little pedal.

00:54:49.445 --> 00:54:52.028
They call it a blues octave or harp octave.

00:54:52.429 --> 00:54:53.409
It gives you some dirt.

00:54:53.789 --> 00:54:54.971
It gives you a real amp-y thing.

00:54:55.010 --> 00:54:57.052
I use that in conjunction with the...

00:54:57.494 --> 00:55:04.360
But that's the extent to which I might do go for that, you know, the sound of the bullet.

00:55:04.601 --> 00:55:07.063
But because I find that the rhythmic playing, when you go...

00:55:09.766 --> 00:55:10.445
I don't want it to go...

00:55:12.588 --> 00:55:14.269
Because of the way that the bullets...

00:55:14.594 --> 00:55:14.994
process.

00:55:15.375 --> 00:55:16.476
I mean, I love the sound of a bullet.

00:55:16.856 --> 00:55:21.681
I'm just not a little Walter guy and a traditional blues sound guy.

00:55:21.882 --> 00:55:25.726
It isn't a palette that I'm interested in applying to what I do.

00:55:26.166 --> 00:55:29.650
I'd like to just sound like it's an instrument, somewhat neutrally.

00:55:30.452 --> 00:55:41.224
Yeah, and you mentioned using effects pedals and delay, which we've talked about using quite a bit, but there's a song of yours called Sideman Boogie, which has got quite an interesting effect on it.

00:55:42.498 --> 00:55:58.175
Simon Boogie would have just been straight into an amp because I didn't use effects back then.

00:55:58.356 --> 00:56:00.998
I was just playing like a maniac, I think.

00:56:03.440 --> 00:56:09.768
I tried one of those sort of chord building things, a pod, where you could octave.

00:56:10.028 --> 00:56:14.909
I tried some octaving, but There was an artificiality to it that I didn't feel to me.

00:56:15.911 --> 00:56:16.411
I've heard them.

00:56:16.592 --> 00:56:17.713
They're super cool, though.

00:56:17.833 --> 00:56:19.516
Octave is a cool thing.

00:56:19.677 --> 00:56:21.358
But I just use the low harp instead.

00:56:22.059 --> 00:56:22.480
Yeah, great.

00:56:22.559 --> 00:56:25.623
And you mentioned, obviously, you've got this album coming out.

00:56:25.664 --> 00:56:26.385
You're hoping to start.

00:56:26.505 --> 00:56:29.568
You're touring in Canada next year.

00:56:29.608 --> 00:56:33.014
And then after that, you're hoping to come across to Europe.

00:56:33.114 --> 00:56:34.755
Is that your current future plans?

00:56:35.496 --> 00:56:35.916
That is.

00:56:35.938 --> 00:56:37.480
I mean, I'd like to do it all.

00:56:37.760 --> 00:56:39.222
I'd like to come to Europe sooner than...

00:56:39.585 --> 00:56:42.250
waiting a whole year and hopefully that'll work out that way.

00:56:42.490 --> 00:56:43.853
I like playing in Europe.

00:56:44.052 --> 00:56:45.054
I like playing in Canada too.

00:56:45.074 --> 00:56:50.824
When I'm playing in the States, I played in Las Vegas this late summer and in the States a few places.

00:56:51.445 --> 00:56:56.134
There's a very expensive work visa process to play in the States here.

00:56:56.153 --> 00:56:58.918
It's like$700 per musician.

00:56:58.958 --> 00:57:00.961
So it's kind of a drag.

00:57:01.422 --> 00:57:03.306
I just like, I like going to Europe.

00:57:03.385 --> 00:57:04.007
I love it there.

00:57:04.027 --> 00:57:05.829
So yes, that's the plan.

00:57:06.273 --> 00:57:06.574
Great.

00:57:06.594 --> 00:57:06.775
Yeah.

00:57:06.795 --> 00:57:08.177
What are you planning to get to in Europe?

00:57:08.217 --> 00:57:09.818
Hopefully the UK is on that list.

00:57:09.858 --> 00:57:16.007
But since we've had Brexit, it seems to be those issues you say with visas and things seem to be getting more complicated.

00:57:16.547 --> 00:57:21.355
The agent I had in Hamburg years ago, he was like, we're not going to Great Britain.

00:57:21.934 --> 00:57:24.097
I didn't understand what it was, but some kind of cost.

00:57:24.619 --> 00:57:25.721
But I'd like to go everywhere.

00:57:25.740 --> 00:57:27.362
I wish I could just tour.

00:57:27.402 --> 00:57:30.806
If I had my way, I would tour and never come home.

00:57:31.487 --> 00:57:32.028
I love it.

00:57:32.168 --> 00:57:33.271
I just love touring.

00:57:34.052 --> 00:57:35.474
I really have always felt that way.

00:57:36.226 --> 00:57:39.289
I love being home too, but there's something about it.

00:57:40.050 --> 00:57:44.898
You usually use the musicians where you tour to rather than taking your own band,

00:57:45.398 --> 00:57:45.898
do you?

00:57:46.360 --> 00:57:47.320
I had the Italian band.

00:57:47.440 --> 00:57:49.623
I'd like to bring my own guys with me.

00:57:49.643 --> 00:57:52.527
I have a woman that plays with me, my own band members.

00:57:52.768 --> 00:57:54.650
It depends on whether we get travel grants.

00:57:54.771 --> 00:57:59.137
I have been lucky enough to find great musicians wherever I've gone.

00:57:59.637 --> 00:58:05.465
Even within Canada, I'll very often take a guitar player and then get out west and hire a rhythm section.

00:58:05.666 --> 00:58:06.387
And it's always great.

00:58:06.788 --> 00:58:09.510
So thanks so much for joining me today, Paul Reddick.

00:58:09.811 --> 00:58:11.173
Thank you very much, Neil.

00:58:11.373 --> 00:58:13.597
It's a great privilege to be on this program.

00:58:13.637 --> 00:58:16.842
And hello to all the people listening and harmonica players.

00:58:17.161 --> 00:58:18.043
Hope to meet you one day.

00:58:19.224 --> 00:58:21.307
Thanks to Zydle for sponsoring the podcast.

00:58:21.688 --> 00:58:31.181
And be sure to check out their great range of harmonicas and products at www.zydle1847.com or on Facebook or Instagram at Zydle Harmonicas.

00:58:31.873 --> 00:58:38.063
Thanks to Paul for joining me today and also to Tom Ellis who once again provided some great research for this episode.

00:58:38.422 --> 00:58:42.809
Tom is writing an article on Paul which will appear in an upcoming Spa magazine.

00:58:42.849 --> 00:58:50.740
And thank you all for listening once again and thanks to Greg Heumann at Blows Me Away Productions for providing some sponsorship for the podcast.

00:58:51.121 --> 00:58:53.143
Over to Paul to play us out.

00:59:00.153 --> 00:59:00.253
Music