Nov. 26, 2022

Richard Hunter interview

Richard Hunter interview

Richard Hunter joins me on episode 74. Richard has immersed himself in harmonica ever since he first picked it up at age 15 and has been pushing the boundaries of the instrument ever since. His first release was a solo acoustic harmonica album, composing most of the songs himself and making extensive use of alternate tunings and counterpoint, followed up by a second album along the same lines. Richard is a true innovator of using effects with harmonica and has created some great sounds using ...

Richard Hunter joins me on episode 74.

Richard has immersed himself in harmonica ever since he first picked it up at age 15 and has been pushing the boundaries of the instrument ever since. His first release was a solo acoustic harmonica album, composing most of the songs himself and making extensive use of alternate tunings and counterpoint, followed up by a second album along the same lines.

Richard is a true innovator of using effects with harmonica and has created some great sounds using them on his later two albums, including the use of Digitech multi-effect pedals, for which he has created patch sets that are available to download from his website.

Richard is also the author of one of the first harmonica transcription books: Jazz Harp, that was released in the 1990s, becoming a staple publication on many a harmonica players’ shelves.


Links:

Richard’s website:
https://www.hunterharp.com/

Chris Turner:
https://christurnerharmonica.bandcamp.com/album/chris-turner-harmonicas

The Lucky One posts:
https://www.hunterharp.com/the-lucky-one-is-here-check-out-the-songs/

Solo acoustic harmonica tracks to buy:
https://www.hunterharp.com/all-hunters-downloads-in-one-place/#Sbuy

Tunings used on solo recordings:
https://www.hunterharp.com/harp-keys-and-tunings-for-my-recorded-solo-repertoire/

The Lucky One breakdown of each song:
https://www.hunterharp.com/the-lucky-one-is-here-check-out-the-songs/

DaBell harmonicas:
http://en.dabell.co.kr/home/bbs//board.php?bo_table=product&sca=Harmonica


Videos:
Richard’s YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/lightninrick

Put The Lever Down, from 1982:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnDPNyimg5o

Recent Electric work:
https://www.hunterharp.com/category/audiovideo/?fbclid=IwAR0bozS97Y4lZwKmGk230CmVEknErhY0rEuvEYQ19mOJOqCRMAi84wi3cVk



Podcast website:
https://www.harmonicahappyhour.com

Donations:
If you want to make a voluntary donation to help support the running costs of the podcast then please use this link (or visit the podcast website link above):
https://paypal.me/harmonicahappyhour?locale.x=en_GB

Spotify Playlist:
Also check out the Spotify Playlist, which contains most of the songs discussed in the podcast:
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5QC6RF2VTfs4iPuasJBqwT?si=M-j3IkiISeefhR7ybm9qIQ

Podcast sponsors:
This podcast is sponsored by SEYDEL harmonicas - visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seydel1847.com  or on Facebook or Instagram at SEYDEL HARMONICAS
and Blows Me Away Productions: http://www.blowsmeaway.com/

Support the show

01:37 - Richard was born in New York and has been based around the North East US all his life

02:08 - Piano was first instrument before deciding on the harmonica (age 15) to get out front and impress the girls

02:45 - Saxophone was an option but the less costly harmonicas was the choice after having heard Paul Butterfield

03:14 - Met his wife while playing the harmonica

03:31 - Had formal piano lessons when young and has taken piano up again recently

04:38 - How piano playing has influenced harmonica playing

05:38 - There are many more great harmonica players now than when Richard was young, helped a lot by online resources

06:36 - Now is a great time to learn to play harmonica

06:53 - Found a community of harmonica players in Boston

07:06 - Charlie Musselwhite was a big influence on the young Richard

08:43 - Had been a devoted harmonica disciple from the age of 15

09:39 - Met Chris Turner, an English harmonica player, during his time in Boston and started writing solo harmonica pieces during this time

11:49 - Winter Sun In Nobska was Richard’s first solo composition

12:20 - Golden Mel song

12:44 - The Act of Being Free in One Act was Richard’s first solo acoustic harmonica album

13:23 - This album was one of the first, if not the first, solo harmonica album of this type

13:32 - Keith Dunn released a solo harmonica album, but that was more blues based

14:39 - Richard composed most of the songs on The Act of Being Free in One Act

14:54 - Hymn For Crow song came to Richard in just 20 minutes

17:23 - Richard uses a lot of different tunings on this album, using Lee Oskar’s at that time

18:11 - Information on the tunings used are available on Richard’s website

18:17 - Need to use the correct tunings to be able to play those songs

19:18 - Chords available on alternate tunings are a big part of the tonality of those songs

20:09 - The Act of Being Free in One Act album is entirely acoustic, no effects added

20:41 - Lots of killer ‘licks’ on the album

22:29 - The Second Act of Free Being album, with almost all tunings used available out of the box

24:00 - Billy The Kid, Bela’s World and How Long Have I Loved You songs

25:28 - Recordings available on Richard’s website of him playing several of these solo pieces at SPAH in 1997

25:51 - The solo pieces are mainly set pieces played from memory (not improvised)

26:37 - Next album (The Lucky One) was released in 2016, almost twenty years since the previous album

27:42 - Performs tracks from The Lucky One using backing tracks from the actual musicians recorded for the album

28:05 - Makes extensive use of effects on The Lucky One

28:50 - First Digitech multi-effects unit bought in 1997 or 1998, which is when Richard really started getting into effects for the harmonica

29:17 - Saw that effects pedals could replace an amplifier

29:30 - Current kit Richard uses

29:54 - Richard provides ‘patch sets’ for the Digitechs where he has selected effects that work well with harmonica

31:31 - Bought a Fender Mustang amp later, and has patch sets for that and the Line 6 multi-effects unit

31:53 - Role of effects in the modern harmonica players arsenal

33:46 - Some of songs on recent two albums and how they use effects

35:10 - Put The Lever Down from The Lucky One album was used as the music for a harmonica radio show

35:58 - Blue Future album from 2019, using harmonica in a different role than the traditional blues band

36:51 - Uses the Fender Mustang amp on most of the songs on the album, a computerised amp

37:28 - Some of the lyrics written by Richard on Blue Future

38:33 - Has spent a lot of time developing singing

39:36 - Website contains a blog with lots of information on how songs on last two albums were put together

40:16 - Since releasing the last two albums has released some videos and now is working on music for licensing purposes

41:07 - Likes to push the role of the harmonica beyond just being a soloist, something that Magic Dick did with The J Geils Band

42:13 - How approaches layering harmonica so doesn’t play over singer

44:03 - Jazz Harp book, released in 1980, which was originally written as a book called ‘Harmonica For Musicians’

45:42 - Was one of first transcription books for harmonica, although Richard still thinks harmonica players should learn to red music

46:28 - Sold quite a few of Jazz Harp and made a little money from it

46:59 - Chromatic harmonica, and recorded some classical pieces and studied some jazz on chromatic

48:02 - Two chromatic songs on The Lucky One album

48:37 - 10 minute question

49:42 - Harmonicas of choice (everyone going!)

51:04 - Buys most of the tunings he uses, doing a little tuning himself

52:17 - How does Richard find switching between different tunings

53:40 - Overblows

54:10 - Embouchre: mostly pucker

54:56 - Amps and pedals and mics

55:48 - Uses wireless mic a lot

56:48 - Lightweight rig uses at jam sessions

57:36 - Has travelled internationally to perform and future plans

WEBVTT

00:00:00.162 --> 00:00:02.245
Richard Hunter joins me on episode 74.

00:00:02.446 --> 00:00:10.317
Richard has immersed himself in harmonica ever since he first picked it up at the age of 15 and has been pushing the boundaries of the instrument ever since.

00:00:10.958 --> 00:00:22.318
His first release was a solo acoustic harmonica album, composing most of the songs himself and making extensive use of alternative tunings and counterpoint, followed up by a second album along the same lines.

00:00:22.722 --> 00:00:36.496
Richard is a true innovator of using effects with harmonica and has created some great sounds using them on his later two albums, including the use of Digitech multi-effect pedals, for which he has created patch sets that are available to download from his website.

00:00:36.798 --> 00:00:47.168
Richard is also the author of one of the first harmonica transcription books, Jazz Harp, that was released in 1980, becoming a staple publication on many a harmonica player's shelves.

00:00:48.890 --> 00:00:51.454
This podcast is sponsored by Zeidel Harmonicas.

00:00:51.777 --> 00:01:00.905
Visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seidel1847.com or on Facebook or Instagram at Seidel Harmonicas.

00:01:29.569 --> 00:01:31.819
Hello, Richard Hunter, and welcome to the podcast.

00:01:32.540 --> 00:01:33.224
Thanks very much.

00:01:33.284 --> 00:01:34.248
It's a pleasure to be here.

00:01:34.287 --> 00:01:36.796
Are you originally from Vermont?

00:01:37.121 --> 00:01:39.864
No, I was born in New York City.

00:01:39.884 --> 00:01:43.587
I lived in New York State till I was about 12 years old.

00:01:43.808 --> 00:01:45.549
Well, actually, until I was 18.

00:01:45.569 --> 00:01:48.591
Then I moved to Boston to attend college.

00:01:48.852 --> 00:01:52.394
And since then, I've been bouncing around the Northeast US.

00:01:52.695 --> 00:01:55.658
Vermont was one of my stops for about three and a half years.

00:01:55.998 --> 00:01:56.259
Great.

00:01:56.319 --> 00:01:57.900
So you're another New Yorker.

00:01:57.980 --> 00:02:01.783
So I spoke to Adam Gussell last time and saying I hadn't had many New Yorkers on.

00:02:01.802 --> 00:02:05.286
Although I remember since I had William Gallatin, who's also, I think, New York.

00:02:05.527 --> 00:02:07.087
What got you started playing harmonica?

00:02:07.087 --> 00:02:11.514
I believe your first instrument was a piano, and you sort of picked up a little after that.

00:02:12.155 --> 00:02:14.598
Yes, my first instrument was piano.

00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:20.606
In 1967, when I was 15 years old, I was playing in a rock band.

00:02:21.127 --> 00:02:24.793
The name of the band, by the way, was Tiki and the Wambizi Gods.

00:02:25.334 --> 00:02:33.506
I was sitting behind this ugly, awful-sounding little Japanese organ while the guitar players were up front getting all the girls.

00:02:33.825 --> 00:02:35.909
And I thought that that was a problem.

00:02:36.010 --> 00:02:40.599
So I went looking for an instrument that would get me up front.

00:02:41.040 --> 00:02:44.929
Guitar wasn't going to do it because we already had two guitarists in the band.

00:02:45.389 --> 00:02:52.846
I checked out a saxophone and I thought it was amazing, but it was also$650, which was beyond my means.

00:02:53.313 --> 00:02:57.818
And then in the music store, I saw a Hohner display case.

00:02:58.437 --> 00:03:06.264
And I had recently been at Manny's Music in New York City and heard Paul Butterfield doing an impromptu performance there.

00:03:06.324 --> 00:03:08.247
And it just sounded amazing.

00:03:08.606 --> 00:03:10.109
And so I thought, well, that's the thing.

00:03:10.169 --> 00:03:11.789
I'll get myself a harmonica,$2.50.

00:03:11.889 --> 00:03:14.312
And that was the beginning.

00:03:14.551 --> 00:03:14.812
Great.

00:03:14.853 --> 00:03:17.055
So the big question is, did it help you get the girls?

00:03:17.814 --> 00:03:23.080
Well, I met my wife playing harmonica in a band on Cape Cod in the early...

00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:24.882
in the early 1980s.

00:03:25.742 --> 00:03:26.925
So yeah, it helped.

00:03:27.185 --> 00:03:27.705
There we go.

00:03:27.725 --> 00:03:29.266
It achieved that one of the life goals.

00:03:29.307 --> 00:03:30.609
Well done to the harmonica.

00:03:30.748 --> 00:03:37.777
So yeah, so you played piano and what did you have sort of formal piano lessons and learn that way first and sort of classical training?

00:03:38.018 --> 00:03:39.881
I did have formal piano lessons.

00:03:40.461 --> 00:03:46.000
I stopped studying classical piano when I was like 11 or 12, I think.

00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:57.209
I started studying jazz piano with John Mahegan, who was at the time an associate professor at Yale University and the author of a four-part series on jazz improvisation.

00:03:57.710 --> 00:04:01.733
And I studied with him for about six months to a year, I think.

00:04:02.013 --> 00:04:06.657
And then I just got into rock and roll and began playing rock and roll with various bands.

00:04:07.138 --> 00:04:10.080
I wasn't very good at the time, but I got better as I went along.

00:04:10.441 --> 00:04:12.021
So do you still play piano now?

00:04:12.361 --> 00:04:12.802
I do.

00:04:13.223 --> 00:04:18.749
For a long period of time, it took a distinct second fiddle to harmonica, so to speak.

00:04:19.069 --> 00:04:21.471
Second harmonica to harmonica, I should say.

00:04:21.951 --> 00:04:26.737
For a long time, I did not devote a lot of attention to it, but I'm devoting attention to it again.

00:04:26.757 --> 00:04:37.908
And I'm coming up to the level that I was at before I started pulling back in order to have a career in information technology and focus on the harmonica.

00:04:38.209 --> 00:04:41.293
And how do you think the piano informs your harmonica playing?

00:04:41.552 --> 00:04:48.521
Well, I have a much better grasp of harmony and of different keys because I play piano.

00:04:48.961 --> 00:04:59.495
Lots of harmonica players are familiar with the physical layout of the harmonica without really being aware of what the harmonic meaning of the layout is.

00:04:59.514 --> 00:05:05.482
And because I played piano, I have a much better idea of that than many harmonica players do.

00:05:05.858 --> 00:05:10.401
I think, you know, I'm a musician who plays harmonica, among other things.

00:05:11.002 --> 00:05:13.964
I'm not a harmonica player per se.

00:05:14.605 --> 00:05:20.670
Yeah, and I think, you know, as harmonica players, we have a slight inferiority complex, you know, about the instrument.

00:05:20.750 --> 00:05:24.853
And I think, obviously, you can be a full-blown musician on harmonica, absolutely.

00:05:24.894 --> 00:05:29.918
But there's more of a tendency maybe to not, because maybe you haven't had formal lessons, a lot of people who play.

00:05:30.338 --> 00:05:36.391
So, you know, I think all that helps, doesn't it, for the education-wise, obviously, playing other instruments, or at least approaching the harmonica more musically

00:05:36.819 --> 00:05:47.338
well indeed It's worth pointing out that the quantity and quality of harmonica players overall has increased dramatically since I began playing.

00:05:47.658 --> 00:06:08.016
You know, there are kids now who've been playing for a couple of years who have learned more than I learned in the first 10 years playing the instrument because they have access to things like YouTube, because there are more harmonica players performing at a professional level in France, in Germany, in the UK, in various countries in Asia, in the United States.

00:06:08.016 --> 00:06:25.230
states of america in latin america i mean they're all over now and that's a significant change from uh from my youth or perhaps it's simply that uh with the internet i'm now much more aware of what's being done everywhere than i was when i was let's say 20 years old

00:06:25.670 --> 00:06:33.937
would you prefer it back then when there wasn't so much competition or do you think you're better off you know the young people are better off now with uh more harmonic players around like you said they're

00:06:34.038 --> 00:06:45.793
definitely better off now i mean if you want to learn the instrument It's great to have people around you virtually or in person who understand something about the instrument and can show you something.

00:06:46.192 --> 00:06:53.278
You know, I had to work really hard just to find people who played harmonica at anything but the most rudimentary level.

00:06:53.560 --> 00:07:02.247
It wasn't until I got to Boston in 1970 that I found a community of harmonica players who were devoted to mastering the instrument.

00:07:02.526 --> 00:07:05.990
So you mentioned there that you'd heard Paul Butterfield, and that's what inspired you.

00:07:06.170 --> 00:07:06.511
Oh, yeah.

00:07:06.750 --> 00:07:07.872
Charlie Musselwhite was also...

00:07:07.951 --> 00:07:09.112
a big influence on you as well.

00:07:09.454 --> 00:07:09.853
Oh, yeah.

00:07:10.555 --> 00:07:16.982
I heard Charlie a year or two after I heard Butterfield, and he just completely blew my mind.

00:07:17.182 --> 00:07:20.245
You know, there's an experience that musicians have.

00:07:20.504 --> 00:07:27.973
Just about every musician I know has had this experience where they're listening to a piece of music and suddenly they're in a different place.

00:07:28.473 --> 00:07:33.598
You know, they've fallen through a door in the universe and they're in a different place because of what they heard.

00:07:33.899 --> 00:07:44.312
And I had that experience for the first time listening to Charlie Musselwhite play Christo Redentor on the Vanguard album, Tennessee Woman, which was released, I think, in 1969.

00:07:59.009 --> 00:08:02.975
That performance just completely blew my mind.

00:08:03.336 --> 00:08:07.261
It was the most amazing amplified harmonica I had ever heard.

00:08:07.461 --> 00:08:15.350
The fact that he was playing this jazz song on the harmonica and making something very meaningful out of it was very important to me.

00:08:15.451 --> 00:08:18.935
And I just devoured Charlie Musselwhite's music after that.

00:08:19.817 --> 00:08:21.319
Yeah, no, no, Charlie's great, of course.

00:08:21.619 --> 00:08:24.822
Here's a quick word from the podcast sponsor, Blows Me Way Productions.

00:08:26.524 --> 00:08:27.005
Blows Me Way Productions

00:08:27.233 --> 00:08:29.738
Hey folks, this is Charlie Musselwhite.

00:08:29.759 --> 00:08:37.111
If you're in the amplified tone like I am, the best and only place to start is a microphone from Blows Me Away Productions.

00:08:37.613 --> 00:08:39.836
Check them out at blowsmeaway.com.

00:08:40.337 --> 00:08:41.721
You know I ain't lying.

00:08:43.484 --> 00:08:50.758
You mentioned that you went to Boston and is that when you were getting more seriously into playing and you picked up on the scene around Boston?

00:08:51.234 --> 00:08:55.017
Well, I was already very serious about playing before I got to Boston.

00:08:55.216 --> 00:08:59.981
I picked up the harmonica when I was 15, so it was with me all through high school.

00:09:00.142 --> 00:09:09.190
And I was very serious about playing the harmonica, very serious about learning new things, very serious about listening to records that had harmonica on them.

00:09:09.330 --> 00:09:17.135
So when I got to Boston, it was like suddenly I was at an all-you-can-eat buffet, so to speak, where there were tons of harmonica players.

00:09:17.437 --> 00:09:19.839
And that's when I started hearing about Little Walter.

00:09:19.958 --> 00:09:25.046
I had been listening to to people like James Cotton and Charlie, of course.

00:09:25.567 --> 00:09:32.578
Players I was listening to were the post-Walter generation, and I really hadn't heard a lot of little Walter before I moved to Boston.

00:09:32.899 --> 00:09:38.327
So I was learning a tremendous amount of harmonica lore throughout that entire period.

00:09:38.769 --> 00:09:41.854
Yeah, and I believe you met up with an English guy called Chris Turner.

00:09:42.018 --> 00:09:43.499
Oh, yes, Chris, indeed.

00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:46.020
That was a fabulous discovery.

00:09:46.101 --> 00:09:48.263
I learned a huge amount playing with Chris.

00:09:48.624 --> 00:09:59.393
It was one of the potent influences in my playing because Chris's playing was so different from mine, and there was just so much stuff to pick up.

00:09:59.493 --> 00:10:03.616
I started writing solo harmonica pieces while I was working with Chris.

00:10:04.136 --> 00:10:08.701
That's where my piece, Wintersun at Nobska, and my piece, Golden Mel, come from.

00:10:09.121 --> 00:10:15.628
I wrote those while I was learning how to play the vamping techniques that Chris Turner had mastered.

00:10:15.847 --> 00:10:23.495
And I met Chris in 1977, I think, just after he had won the European Solo Harmonica Championship.

00:10:23.615 --> 00:10:26.178
You know, so he was operating at a high level.

00:10:26.539 --> 00:10:30.364
I was teaching a seminar on harmonica.

00:10:30.484 --> 00:10:31.784
I forget exactly where.

00:10:32.024 --> 00:10:42.616
Chris showed up and there had been a listing in the Boston Phoenix, the local alternative paper, from a guy who said, I'm the 1976 European Solo Harmonica champion.

00:10:42.677 --> 00:10:45.360
I'm in town looking to hook up with other musicians.

00:10:45.860 --> 00:10:49.445
So this guy in the audience had an English accent.

00:10:49.485 --> 00:10:51.527
And I said, are you the guy who placed that ad?

00:10:51.606 --> 00:10:52.307
And he said, yes.

00:10:52.587 --> 00:10:57.813
And I said, ladies and gentlemen, we have the 1976 world solo harmonica champion in this room.

00:11:03.541 --> 00:11:07.966
So

00:11:11.009 --> 00:11:15.936
And I got together with Chris after the class, and we went back to my apartment.

00:11:16.196 --> 00:11:23.783
I had a Premier Twin-8 amplifier, which is and was one of the great rock and harmonica amplifiers.

00:11:23.945 --> 00:11:27.908
And Chris plugged into it and began doing his vamping stuff through the amp.

00:11:28.308 --> 00:11:30.471
The sound was huge.

00:11:31.072 --> 00:11:32.413
I was just amazed.

00:11:32.553 --> 00:11:35.677
And I thought, wow, I have to learn how to make that sound.

00:11:36.359 --> 00:11:39.221
This time in Boston, what year we're looking at here...

00:11:40.546 --> 00:11:42.191
Oh, this would be 1977.

00:11:42.892 --> 00:11:43.173
Great.

00:11:43.232 --> 00:11:49.129
And so this is when you mentioned a couple of the songs are like Golden Mail, which I think was your first solo composition.

00:11:49.169 --> 00:11:49.330
Yeah.

00:11:49.610 --> 00:11:53.441
I think Winter Sun at Nobsca was my first solo composition.

00:12:08.546 --> 00:12:14.416
It's quite a bit simpler in performance, not conceptually.

00:12:14.635 --> 00:12:17.159
It was heavily influenced by Bella Bartok's work.

00:12:17.480 --> 00:12:20.144
So conceptually, it's a little bit out there.

00:12:20.404 --> 00:12:26.475
But Golden Mel was conceived as a virtuoso workout.

00:12:26.615 --> 00:12:29.019
You know, it's not an easy piece to play.

00:12:29.220 --> 00:12:30.160
Certainly not for me.

00:12:44.097 --> 00:12:52.749
So these were what went to be your album, which you released, which is an acoustic solo harmonica album called The Actor Being Free in one act.

00:12:53.153 --> 00:12:53.494
Yes.

00:12:54.075 --> 00:12:58.081
Were you developing these songs over a few years then before you put this album out?

00:12:58.500 --> 00:13:02.547
Some of those songs were developed a few years before the album was put out.

00:13:03.047 --> 00:13:09.174
Most of them were developed after I got a grant from the Vermont Council on the Arts.

00:13:09.596 --> 00:13:16.345
They granted me$400 to make an album, which isn't much, but I figured I could make an album of solo pieces for that amount.

00:13:16.664 --> 00:13:23.134
And so I started collecting and practicing and writing solo pieces for that record.

00:13:23.490 --> 00:13:28.437
Yeah, so I don't think there'd been many, if any, solo harmonica albums out by that stage.

00:13:28.657 --> 00:13:30.259
Were you aware of others at that time?

00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:32.322
No, I'm still not aware of them.

00:13:32.442 --> 00:13:44.919
Although Keith Dunn, I think, who I used to see playing in Harvard Square back in the 1970s, Keith was one of the guys who convinced me that you should have a harmonica on you all the time and play it wherever you go.

00:13:45.179 --> 00:13:51.589
But I think Keith did an album that consisted of harmonica solos and harmonica duets with his voice.

00:13:55.105 --> 00:13:59.335
So

00:14:04.365 --> 00:14:06.650
that's the only one I'm aware of.

00:14:06.990 --> 00:14:13.725
Other than that, purely solo instrumental harmonica records, I think there are two in existence, and I made both of them.

00:14:14.114 --> 00:14:20.840
Yeah, I mean, I think there's like a Sonny Terry one, but I think in your approach is certainly unique in the sort of material that you're taking on.

00:14:20.860 --> 00:14:22.000
It's not a blues album.

00:14:22.100 --> 00:14:24.082
You know, there's some bluesy stuff on there, right?

00:14:24.123 --> 00:14:25.264
But it's not a blues album.

00:14:25.303 --> 00:14:26.585
It's more kind of composition.

00:14:26.644 --> 00:14:30.607
So I've been listening to the album before this, and I've got to say, it is fantastic.

00:14:30.628 --> 00:14:32.049
Some great playing on there, Richard.

00:14:32.070 --> 00:14:32.909
Really impressed with it.

00:14:32.990 --> 00:14:38.794
And it's available, the individual songs are available by your website as well for people to buy and check out.

00:14:39.716 --> 00:14:43.058
These are all pieces that you, more or less, all of them you compose yourself.

00:14:43.078 --> 00:14:49.625
Yeah, some of them are, you know, Like Blue Monks on there, for example, is the jazz song, but most of them are composed by yourself.

00:14:49.926 --> 00:14:50.187
Yes.

00:14:50.706 --> 00:14:53.850
So how did you approach composing solo harmonica pieces?

00:14:54.370 --> 00:14:54.892
Some of those

00:14:54.991 --> 00:15:00.597
pieces came to me in a relative flash, practically fully made.

00:15:01.158 --> 00:15:02.038
Him for Crow.

00:15:02.340 --> 00:15:05.462
I had a friend named Crow in Vermont, David Levine.

00:15:05.482 --> 00:15:09.386
He died of stomach cancer while I was in Vermont.

00:15:09.868 --> 00:15:12.770
And a few weeks later, I was thinking about him all the time.

00:15:12.831 --> 00:15:19.047
And a walking down the road with a harmonica in my hand, as I usually do when I walk down the road.

00:15:19.086 --> 00:15:27.111
I started playing and Hymn for Crow basically came into existence in practically completed form within 20 minutes.

00:15:40.066 --> 00:15:42.596
That's an unusual kind of experience.

00:15:42.677 --> 00:15:43.922
It happens once in a while.

00:15:44.202 --> 00:15:50.408
The rest of the pieces, since they were instrumental pieces, they usually began with an instrumental idea.

00:15:50.946 --> 00:15:56.693
And then I would extend that idea, add additional sections to it.

00:15:57.173 --> 00:16:01.740
By this time, I usually had an idea of what tuning I would use on the piece.

00:16:01.821 --> 00:16:04.403
In fact, I would have that idea from the very start.

00:16:04.624 --> 00:16:10.172
There was one interesting composition process that went into that record.

00:16:10.451 --> 00:16:15.979
I was practicing a technical exercise on a natural minor harmonica.

00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:20.785
And at the time, I was recording every practice session I did.

00:16:20.929 --> 00:16:27.559
because I knew the record was coming up and I recorded every practice session so I could pick up on what was going on with the pieces.

00:16:27.580 --> 00:16:31.326
And this was just an exercise that I was doing.

00:16:31.647 --> 00:16:35.893
And suddenly it shifted and became the theme for Rock Heart.

00:16:36.214 --> 00:16:46.048
And you can hear on the tape of that practice session, the point in time at which the rhythm on it shifts just slightly and you have Rock Heart coming out.

00:17:02.785 --> 00:17:07.128
And then I did a work on a B section for rock harp.

00:17:07.554 --> 00:17:20.184
The natural minor harps are really good for that stuff, among other things, because the harmonies, the minor harmonies on the five chord are just very, very sweet, very beautiful.

00:17:20.484 --> 00:17:23.327
You know, you have major ninth chords and all that stuff to work with.

00:17:23.548 --> 00:17:26.529
So, I mean, you mentioned, obviously, that you're playing different tunings.

00:17:26.590 --> 00:17:32.976
And at this stage, I think that must have been quite early in the, were these Lee Oscars that you're playing the different tunings on?

00:17:33.296 --> 00:17:38.641
The act of being free in one act was entirely recorded with Lee Oscar harmonicas.

00:17:38.961 --> 00:17:43.546
Yeah, I was using the Lee Oscar Melody Makers.

00:17:44.007 --> 00:17:52.875
I tuned up one reed on a standard harmonica in order to get the country tuning that I used on a couple of tunes.

00:17:53.457 --> 00:18:04.469
I bought the natural minors off the shelf and used the reed plates from a natural minor combined with the reed plates from a standard harp to make Dorian minor tunings.

00:18:04.969 --> 00:18:11.415
So most of the tunings I used on on that record were assembled from off-the-shelf Lee Oscar parts.

00:18:11.696 --> 00:18:15.359
The information on the tunings that you use are all available on your website, yeah?

00:18:15.480 --> 00:18:16.040
Yes.

00:18:16.080 --> 00:18:17.061
So people can check that out.

00:18:17.482 --> 00:18:21.807
So what do you think about this approach of using multiple different tunings on the album?

00:18:22.127 --> 00:18:24.430
Can you only play these songs with those tunings?

00:18:24.891 --> 00:18:25.211
Yes.

00:18:25.731 --> 00:18:30.737
If people wanted to learn them, say, themselves, they would have to get hold of those tunings to do it justice, yeah?

00:18:31.037 --> 00:18:31.597
Absolutely.

00:18:31.637 --> 00:18:41.089
There's a fair amount of harmonic motion in those tunes, and it just does It does not sound right if you're playing it on a different tuning.

00:18:41.130 --> 00:18:51.608
I mean, if you played the stuff that I do on a natural minor on a standard tuning, even something as regular as when Johnny comes marching home, something as traditional as that.

00:19:05.602 --> 00:19:10.553
You can't play the arrangement that I did on that tune without a natural minor harp.

00:19:10.733 --> 00:19:11.935
The chords aren't there.

00:19:11.977 --> 00:19:17.208
You couldn't play it as something with harmony on it on a standard harmonica.

00:19:17.388 --> 00:19:18.211
Just wouldn't work.

00:19:18.431 --> 00:19:19.954
Is the chords a big part of that then?

00:19:20.316 --> 00:19:21.017
Absolutely.

00:19:21.317 --> 00:19:24.806
We talked earlier about my understanding of the piano.

00:19:25.026 --> 00:19:31.394
Playing the piano gives you much better insight into what the chords are that you're playing and how they relate to each other.

00:19:31.815 --> 00:19:35.900
And most harmonica players aren't very well versed in chords.

00:19:36.059 --> 00:19:37.461
And there are a few reasons for that.

00:19:37.642 --> 00:19:42.567
First of all, they're playing a standard tuned harmonica on folk type music.

00:19:42.929 --> 00:19:43.730
You know, that works.

00:19:44.190 --> 00:19:53.102
The second reason is that they tend to play amplified through bullet type mics and amplified tube amps.

00:19:53.506 --> 00:19:58.851
When you play a bullet mic through one of those amps, it just mushes the chords that you're playing.

00:19:59.111 --> 00:20:08.919
The chord is heard as a kind of rhythmic thing, a punctuation, as opposed to a harmonic entity that's got a direction to it.

00:20:09.259 --> 00:20:10.980
So this is an acoustic album, right?

00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:13.583
You didn't use any effects on this album, is that right?

00:20:13.804 --> 00:20:14.263
That's right.

00:20:14.324 --> 00:20:17.186
I wanted to strip it back to the absolute bare minimum.

00:20:17.227 --> 00:20:23.471
Remember that I only had$400 to record this thing with, so I didn't want to spend a lot of money.

00:20:23.471 --> 00:20:29.939
of time in the studio experimenting with effects i wanted to have something that worked with one harmonica and one player

00:20:29.979 --> 00:20:54.484
all right great and obviously effects is a big part of your playing we'll get into that later but uh you know just interesting that this isn't an acoustic album it's great to hear that side of you because obviously using a lot of effects as well later on so oh yes on the album there's some really killer licks you probably wouldn't call them licks but you know i'm listening to them thinking yeah there's a really nice sweet top end lick there that i'm thinking i have to learn and in every song i'm sort of hearing that thinking yeah there's a really another killer riff there i and try and learn that riff.

00:21:07.597 --> 00:21:10.059
How did you approach putting those kind of riffs in?

00:21:10.460 --> 00:21:17.787
Well, because there are multiple parts going on in those tunes, I tend to think in terms of foreground and background.

00:21:18.367 --> 00:21:20.450
And once you establish...

00:21:21.057 --> 00:21:24.383
the rhythmic background, the audience hears it in their head.

00:21:24.663 --> 00:21:48.198
Like, for example, on my recording on the act of being free in one act of Coming Home Baby, I establish a rhythmic motif fairly early on, and then I can improvise leads over that because the audience still has the rhythmic part in their heads as I'm moving them forward through something more elaborate, something less tethered to the rhythmic line.

00:21:58.402 --> 00:22:02.424
Is the album multi-track with different harmonica parts or is it all played through once?

00:22:02.986 --> 00:22:10.112
Every cut on the act of being free in one act is played with a single harmonica in real time.

00:22:10.132 --> 00:22:11.874
There is no overdubbing.

00:22:12.074 --> 00:22:14.236
We edited on a couple of pieces.

00:22:14.336 --> 00:22:21.682
We took, let's say, the third chorus from one recording and melded it with the first and second choruses of another.

00:22:21.842 --> 00:22:24.744
But there was no overdubbing on that record at all.

00:22:24.785 --> 00:22:28.367
You're always listening to one player and one instrument.

00:22:28.367 --> 00:22:28.827
Great.

00:22:28.868 --> 00:22:29.608
It's come out great.

00:22:29.648 --> 00:22:38.137
So you followed this up then with a second act of Being Free, which is a similar approach, although you do add, I think, a guitar player at least, don't you, to it?

00:22:38.199 --> 00:22:39.880
So on some of the songs, not all of them.

00:22:40.260 --> 00:22:40.601
Yeah.

00:22:41.162 --> 00:22:47.488
I had Jerome Harrison, a fabulous guitarist who has worked for many years with Sonny Rollins.

00:22:48.068 --> 00:22:58.319
And there was a third collaboration on that record with the singer Susan Catrona, my daughter, who sang It Takes a Lot to Laugh, It Takes a Train to Cry while I played a compliment on it.

00:22:58.319 --> 00:22:59.201
What

00:22:59.902 --> 00:23:07.311
year did

00:23:08.994 --> 00:23:10.135
this second one come

00:23:10.717 --> 00:23:10.817
out?

00:23:10.856 --> 00:23:14.501
The first one, The Act of Being Free, came out, I think, in 1994.

00:23:14.741 --> 00:23:17.846
The second Act of Free Being, I think, was 1997.

00:23:17.987 --> 00:23:25.877
I was a much more skilled player in terms of counterpoint by the time we did the second Act of Free Being.

00:23:26.337 --> 00:23:31.963
Yeah, and again, some great playing and the different tunings used again, and again, all the information that is available.

00:23:32.450 --> 00:23:41.718
As of this point in time, by the way, almost all the tunings that I used are available out of the box from major manufacturers.

00:23:42.038 --> 00:23:48.503
And so you can get a Melody Maker harmonica, you can get a country tuned harmonica, you can get a natural minor.

00:23:48.564 --> 00:24:00.173
The only one I haven't seen the majors take out yet is the Dorian minor tuning, which is too bad, but you can easily make that by combining a draw plate from a natural minor with the blow plate from a standard harp.

00:24:00.413 --> 00:24:02.898
And so Billy the Kid is a song of out on there.

00:24:02.919 --> 00:24:07.006
That's country tuning I believe and again some really intricate pattern playing on there.

00:24:17.857 --> 00:24:22.425
Well, you asked previously whether you could play the pieces on a standard tuned instrument.

00:24:22.705 --> 00:24:27.994
I have in an emergency, but it just doesn't have the same cowboy feel to it.

00:24:28.355 --> 00:24:32.303
The difference between the major seventh and the flat seventh is a world of difference.

00:24:32.864 --> 00:24:43.141
Another one I picked out is Bella's World, which I was reading that you thought that one worked really well as a solo piece, whereas some of the other ones, you know, work well with having the accompaniment you mentioned has been added to the album.

00:24:43.662 --> 00:24:43.741
Yeah.

00:24:54.306 --> 00:24:57.251
Bela's World is one of my special pieces.

00:24:57.332 --> 00:25:00.518
That also is heavily influenced by Bela Bartok.

00:25:01.019 --> 00:25:03.703
I mean, a song I really liked on here is How Long Have I Loved You?

00:25:04.045 --> 00:25:04.464
Really nice.

00:25:04.506 --> 00:25:05.968
Again, and that's played on a natural minor.

00:25:06.308 --> 00:25:06.930
Absolutely.

00:25:07.171 --> 00:25:11.859
And again, that's an example of a piece that just would not work on anything but a natural minor.

00:25:12.119 --> 00:25:17.109
I wrote the harmonica part for that completely before I added the harmony to it.

00:25:17.442 --> 00:25:19.384
And I like to think the tune came out well.

00:25:19.683 --> 00:25:24.768
It sounded great with a quartet at the Buckeye Harmonica Festival in 1999.

00:25:25.588 --> 00:25:32.755
You've got some recordings on your website of you performing at Spa in 1997, which I think a lot of these solo pieces that we've talked about.

00:25:32.875 --> 00:25:36.778
So what was that like performing these solo pieces at Spa?

00:25:37.199 --> 00:25:37.799
It was great.

00:25:37.980 --> 00:25:39.401
I had an attentive audience.

00:25:39.701 --> 00:25:42.022
The music was new to that audience.

00:25:42.403 --> 00:25:43.684
I performed it pretty well.

00:25:44.285 --> 00:25:51.253
In listening to those recordings, I'm amazed at how fast I was clearly hyped on adrenaline.

00:25:51.374 --> 00:25:57.663
You know, when it comes to playing solo pieces like this, you know, were these memorized pieces or are they sort of at least partially improvised?

00:25:58.144 --> 00:25:58.965
All memorized.

00:25:59.346 --> 00:26:08.701
Some of them have room for improvisation in them, but mostly the pieces are through composed, meaning that everything is composed.

00:26:09.026 --> 00:26:19.626
You know, one of the reasons for that is that when you screw up with a band behind you, you've generally got somebody to keep the stuff going until you recover yourself.

00:26:19.867 --> 00:26:24.817
But when you're doing a solo performance, if you screwed up, you can't blame it on the drummer.

00:26:25.122 --> 00:26:28.484
And so I tend to use surefire stuff.

00:26:28.825 --> 00:26:36.852
Over time, the arrangements change, but at any given point in time, I'm playing an arrangement that's through composed, not improvised.

00:26:37.172 --> 00:26:39.755
So your next album is not released till 2016.

00:26:39.795 --> 00:26:41.076
So quite a gap there.

00:26:41.096 --> 00:26:48.642
You were still performing and then playing at festivals during this time, but you hadn't released an album since the second act to the lucky one in 2016.

00:26:49.063 --> 00:26:50.163
Yes, that's right.

00:26:50.183 --> 00:26:51.704
There were a number of reasons for that.

00:26:52.346 --> 00:26:59.546
I was still playing, still working to improve my skills, but I was also getting interested in songwriting, in lyric writing.

00:27:00.130 --> 00:27:04.953
in singing, which until recently was a very big struggle for me.

00:27:05.335 --> 00:27:17.765
And there were things going on in my non-musical life as well that made it difficult to maintain a significant presence out there in the world, in the world of performance in particular.

00:27:18.445 --> 00:27:24.611
When you make a record, you're essentially investing capital in the hope that you're going to get a return on it.

00:27:24.951 --> 00:27:28.193
You can get a return if you're performing regularly.

00:27:28.515 --> 00:27:32.798
If you're not performing regularly CDs simply do not sell.

00:27:33.338 --> 00:27:42.249
So I took a big gamble when I put out The Lucky One, but I was thinking more along the lines of licensing those pieces than I was of performing them with the band.

00:27:42.950 --> 00:27:49.676
Now I perform those pieces with the tracks that I cut in the studio with that band in Philadelphia.

00:27:49.717 --> 00:27:52.559
And it's a very nice performance setup.

00:27:52.619 --> 00:27:57.986
The tracks are a lot more interesting than most pre-recorded tracks because they were played by real musicians.

00:27:58.465 --> 00:28:04.457
So for The Lucky One, you Like you say, you developed your lyric writing there, which is really great, by the way, as well.

00:28:04.517 --> 00:28:12.291
And also, you're well known for using effects, such as using the Digitech RP500, which has got multiple effects on it.

00:28:12.712 --> 00:28:14.797
When did you start really getting into using effects?

00:28:15.258 --> 00:28:20.008
In 1982, I released a single called Put the Lever Down.

00:28:30.210 --> 00:28:33.093
which was my first recorded use of a flanger.

00:28:33.492 --> 00:28:37.236
And for years after that, the flanger was part of my kit.

00:28:37.536 --> 00:28:44.402
I really started getting into effects later on when I had more money to play with effects.

00:28:44.422 --> 00:28:59.655
1997 or 8, I went into a music store, a musical instrument store, and I was trying out the gear and I picked up a Digitech RP200, which was a very primitive machine compared to the RP500 that I have in my kit now.

00:28:59.955 --> 00:29:02.630
But I picked it up and I started messing with it.

00:29:02.891 --> 00:29:05.464
And I came upon a patch with a pitch shifter in it.

00:29:05.698 --> 00:29:12.364
And I heard the sound coming out of that thing when I played the pitch shifter and I just picked it up off the floor and took it to the counter right then.

00:29:12.723 --> 00:29:16.728
That's, I think, when I really started going ape about effects.

00:29:17.327 --> 00:29:30.038
And I eventually came to the conclusion that I could replace an amplifier on stage and a whole pedal board with something like an RP-355 and then later with a Digitech RP-500.

00:29:30.179 --> 00:29:39.448
And right now in my kit, in my looping kit, I have a Digitech RP-360 and a Line 6 Helix Stomp.

00:29:39.708 --> 00:29:45.615
Those two generators, sound generators themselves, put out an enormous variety of tones.

00:29:46.556 --> 00:29:53.923
It's a lot easier and less expensive to build your kit out of these multi-effects devices than it is to build it out of pedals on the floor.

00:29:54.144 --> 00:29:57.106
So about the Digitech machines that you mentioned there.

00:29:57.207 --> 00:30:00.911
So you provide patch sets, as you call them, by your website.

00:30:00.931 --> 00:30:04.214
And I did own these myself and I bought them quite a few years ago now.

00:30:04.595 --> 00:30:23.555
And so what I found great about them is that you've done a lot of the work to find the sounds that work with the harmonica you know because quite often when you get these kind of multi-effects units it's like so mind-boggling the options the number of options right that you you know you kind of give up before you start so it was great to be able to get you know stuff that you kind of pre-built for you know and to sort of say okay this one works and

00:30:23.815 --> 00:30:44.217
my thinking with the patch sets was this gear is cheap it sounds really good and uh it can really expand the horizons for harmonica players so let's put together a patch set with With 25, 50 patches in it, each patch representing a different sound, dozen or so bread and butter blues sounds.

00:30:44.718 --> 00:30:46.619
Let's give them some farther out stuff.

00:30:46.680 --> 00:30:48.942
Let's give them some really far out stuff.

00:30:49.202 --> 00:30:51.065
And I think that the concept is very good.

00:30:51.144 --> 00:31:00.434
I haven't been able to interest any of the manufacturers of these devices in putting out one that's already pre-programmed with stuff for harmonica players.

00:31:00.535 --> 00:31:02.876
But I think that that's a next step.

00:31:03.096 --> 00:31:05.019
And the Digitech pedals are still available yet.

00:31:05.038 --> 00:31:08.502
It's just some of the Yeah, Digitech

00:31:08.542 --> 00:31:11.625
went out of business for a while, and now they've been purchased.

00:31:12.205 --> 00:31:15.788
They should be back in business selling cool stuff again before too long.

00:31:16.068 --> 00:31:28.539
I felt that the multi-effects devices were really good value for money and that the Digitechs sounded really good and cost about half the price of a comparable Line 6 device.

00:31:29.059 --> 00:31:31.162
So I focused on the Digitechs up front.

00:31:31.442 --> 00:31:35.165
Later on, I bought a Fender Mustang 3 V.2 amp.

00:31:35.554 --> 00:31:37.776
which is an amp that I really like, by the way.

00:31:37.796 --> 00:31:40.738
And I programmed a set of patches for that as well.

00:31:40.759 --> 00:31:52.749
I've started work on a set of patches for the Line 6 Spider Series amps, and I like the way they sound as well too, but I haven't gotten around to packaging them up and making them ready for sale.

00:31:53.249 --> 00:31:57.032
You know, some harmonica purists would say, you know, why do you want all those wacky sounds?

00:31:57.053 --> 00:31:58.314
They don't sound like a harmonica.

00:31:58.594 --> 00:32:06.480
But I like the approach of using some effects at least, and possibly more, because, you know, hey, a guitar player's got a massive pedalboard, right?

00:32:06.500 --> 00:32:10.325
You know, why shouldn't we have a pedalboard as well to provide a variety of sounds?

00:32:10.404 --> 00:32:16.971
So, you know, what would you say to people who would say, oh, you know, I can't, it would sort of shy away from having lots of effects on the harmonica?

00:32:17.573 --> 00:32:24.480
You know, the heyday of Chicago blues harp was 70 years ago, and it's a great style.

00:32:24.519 --> 00:32:25.721
It's a great sound.

00:32:26.122 --> 00:32:29.025
Every harmonica player should have that sound in their battery.

00:32:29.325 --> 00:32:30.686
But, you know, it's 2022.

00:32:30.767 --> 00:32:39.036
Tom Morello, the lead guitarist for Rage Against the Machine makes sounds that you would never think a guitar could make.

00:32:39.195 --> 00:32:40.517
And there's nothing wrong with that.

00:32:40.637 --> 00:32:47.785
And nobody says, oh, Morello ought to take all that stuff off the instrument and sound like Elvis's guitarist.

00:32:47.964 --> 00:32:56.755
I just don't see the point of ignoring all of the incredible advances in sound production technology that we've had since the 1950s.

00:32:57.816 --> 00:33:08.049
When I started using the Digitech pedals, I was telling people this stuff, you know, a pedal plugged right into the PA is the wave of the future and it is.

00:33:08.546 --> 00:33:27.281
You can see from the success of Lone Wolf, for example, that harmonica players are now into using a pedal straight to the board to ease the strain on their backs, to ease the strain on their wallets, and to get a consistent sound from location to location.

00:33:27.962 --> 00:33:40.515
And it's interesting to me that the most popular pedals for harmonica players are the ones that focus entirely on emulating the sound of Chicago blues from the 1950s.

00:33:41.455 --> 00:33:42.217
And that's cool.

00:33:42.616 --> 00:33:46.281
But with modern effects, many more things are possible.

00:33:46.623 --> 00:33:46.823
Yeah.

00:33:46.843 --> 00:33:50.728
And so talking a little bit about a couple of the songs on these next two albums.

00:33:50.748 --> 00:33:58.178
So the lucky one, it's got a song called Early to Bed, where you've got a very strange effect, which is what I think you call alien harmonica, which is using the pitch shifter.

00:34:01.102 --> 00:34:01.182
Yeah.

00:34:07.009 --> 00:34:13.797
Wait a minute.

00:34:13.817 --> 00:34:14.077
Wait a minute.

00:34:15.842 --> 00:34:19.784
Early to Bed is a cover of a song by Morphine.

00:34:20.065 --> 00:34:22.608
Basically, the tune runs on one riff.

00:34:22.967 --> 00:34:25.771
It's a rhythmic riff that doesn't change through the song.

00:34:26.090 --> 00:34:29.653
Anyway, there are two harmonica sounds used on it.

00:34:30.213 --> 00:34:36.980
One is a patch with an octave shifted down and a wah-wah effect on the sound.

00:34:37.300 --> 00:34:42.485
What I was aiming for was something that sounds like what Prince was doing on the song Kiss.

00:34:45.047 --> 00:34:48.951
So the other sound effect that I used was called the whammy effect.

00:34:49.472 --> 00:34:58.081
And the whammy effect allows you to shift the pitch anywhere from two octaves down to two octaves up under foot pedal control.

00:34:58.121 --> 00:35:06.990
So I was playing a solo on that song and just whacking away with the whammy effect to shift the pitch all over the place.

00:35:07.351 --> 00:35:08.711
I thought it was kind of spooky.

00:35:09.092 --> 00:35:09.873
I really liked it.

00:35:10.233 --> 00:35:14.818
Another one, which is Put the Lever Down, which you mentioned you'd recorded earlier, but you record it on this album as well.

00:35:15.239 --> 00:35:17.307
Has this gotten multi-layered harmonicas on there.

00:35:17.590 --> 00:35:18.193
Absolutely.

00:35:29.025 --> 00:35:37.492
That has two harmonicas on it, and that's the one that I released in 1982 with a flanger on it.

00:35:37.693 --> 00:35:45.920
In this case, I used two different harmonicas, different effects on both, and I had a great rhythm section behind me, which doesn't hurt at all.

00:35:46.300 --> 00:35:52.706
Yeah, and you had, I think this was used on a radio show, a harmonica music show called The Tin Sandwich.

00:35:52.827 --> 00:35:53.766
It was a theme tune for that.

00:35:53.967 --> 00:35:57.451
Yeah, the one that they ran on The Tin Sandwich was the one from 1982.

00:35:57.471 --> 00:35:58.251
Then moving on

00:35:58.992 --> 00:36:14.367
to your your latest album which is called blue future a release in 2019 so this is interesting you know you mentioned the blues a lot though so this is kind of a very heavily based blues album with a kind of futuristic tinge to it yeah so you kind of got an electronic kind of blues uh coming out

00:36:14.608 --> 00:36:38.306
yes the uh the idea uh was to use the harmonica in a variety of roles that it's not typically used in in a blues band uh sometimes it's fairly extreme but i tried to to establish continuity with the past as well so you notice for example on the title track Blue Future the lead harmonica is an acoustic harmonica.

00:36:50.561 --> 00:37:02.311
The device that was used for most of the leads on that record, I think maybe all of the leads except for Blue Future, was the Fender Mustang amplifier, not the Digitech RP500.

00:37:02.773 --> 00:37:09.778
I used the RP500 to fill in a lot of the backing tracks, like for organ sounds and stuff like that.

00:37:10.179 --> 00:37:20.527
By that point, I really liked, I did want to have continuity with traditional blues, and the Fender Mustang amplifier gave me more of that continuity.

00:37:20.527 --> 00:37:20.943
I sell.

00:37:21.538 --> 00:37:23.559
Is the Mustang, is that a solid state amp?

00:37:23.679 --> 00:37:25.561
It's a computer chip driven amp.

00:37:25.822 --> 00:37:27.983
So in that sense, I guess it's solid state.

00:37:28.204 --> 00:37:28.483
Yeah.

00:37:28.543 --> 00:37:34.228
So yeah, so great, great album, a really good modern take on the blues and some fantastic lyrics on the album as well.

00:37:34.248 --> 00:37:40.894
You've got a song called Disconnected Blues about, you know, kind of feeling disconnected to the kind of world of social media and that sort of thing.

00:37:40.954 --> 00:37:47.501
And Blue Future is a song where you're singing the kind of homage to the blues, but kind of pointing the blues to the future as well.

00:37:47.960 --> 00:38:05.083
Give up your black hat bone Throw away your mojo too send little john the kangaroo home he can't do nothing for you and if we tear the whole thing

00:38:05.164 --> 00:38:11.934
down

00:38:14.465 --> 00:38:17.728
So you have some really good lyrics on here and the lyrics that you wrote, yeah?

00:38:18.329 --> 00:38:19.170
Thank you very much.

00:38:19.469 --> 00:38:20.791
I work hard on the lyrics.

00:38:21.132 --> 00:38:24.454
Over time, I revisit them and tune them up a bit.

00:38:24.855 --> 00:38:32.882
I'm told that Leonard Cohen spent seven years writing Hallelujah, so I'm not afraid to take a while to write a song.

00:38:33.282 --> 00:38:39.608
Right, it's funny you should mention Leonard Cohen because I was listening to a couple of songs thinking you sound a little bit like Leonard Cohen on some of the songs.

00:38:39.947 --> 00:38:43.710
Yeah, like I said, I've been working on my singing for a while.

00:38:44.092 --> 00:38:46.534
So he's So you spent a lot of time learning your singing.

00:38:46.574 --> 00:38:48.275
Have you had singing lessons or anything like that?

00:38:48.436 --> 00:38:48.496
I

00:38:48.556 --> 00:38:50.157
did take singing lessons, yeah.

00:38:50.297 --> 00:38:57.085
You know, I've been singing since I was 15 and I've sounded like, you know, awful since I was 15.

00:38:58.467 --> 00:39:06.094
When you spend that long trying to do something and it's not working, you're doing something wrong and you haven't figured out what it is.

00:39:06.114 --> 00:39:09.659
And that's when you absolutely must see a teacher.

00:39:10.179 --> 00:39:10.840
You know, it's great.

00:39:10.880 --> 00:39:16.853
And I've talked about singing on the podcast a lot about, you know, obviously it's harmonica play We all really wish we could sing, those who don't.

00:39:17.534 --> 00:39:25.041
So yeah, it's encouraging to hear that you're happy you've got there now and your singing's to a place that you're happy with after putting a lot of effort into it.

00:39:25.313 --> 00:39:26.054
Absolutely.

00:39:26.074 --> 00:39:28.536
I just wish I'd taken lessons when I was 20.

00:39:28.916 --> 00:39:32.199
But then again, I was happy just to be playing harmonica at the time.

00:39:32.840 --> 00:39:39.246
And so on these last two albums that we've just talked through, your website contains a great blog.

00:39:39.286 --> 00:39:46.833
And in this blog, you go into great detail about how you record the songs, the harmonicas you use, the effects you use.

00:39:46.853 --> 00:39:50.335
It's a tremendous amount of information on pretty much all the songs, right?

00:39:50.396 --> 00:39:53.097
Because you wrote these blogs as you went through, yeah?

00:39:53.117 --> 00:39:57.181
So it's a great resource to be able to go and check out exactly what you did in all these songs

00:39:57.521 --> 00:40:15.882
you know i felt like uh when i recorded those songs i was showing what could be done i'm not at the point in my career where i consider it essential to keep trade secrets you know and so i'd rather spread the knowledge about how i did this stuff than have it disappear when i disappear so to speak

00:40:16.322 --> 00:40:27.157
so great so yeah so you released those two albums and then um you know since then you're still you know you're still active you're releasing quite a few videos of you playing and And you've got you playing Cruisin'.

00:40:40.673 --> 00:40:44.800
You're putting out these videos of the last year or so as your sort of output.

00:40:44.960 --> 00:40:46.061
Yeah, I'm cutting

00:40:46.141 --> 00:40:54.331
back on posting my music to Facebook because I'm concentrating right now on creating music for licensing purposes.

00:40:54.753 --> 00:41:00.981
And I'm working with a very skilled guitar player and we're putting together tracks to be used for commercial purposes.

00:41:01.021 --> 00:41:06.688
The people who license that stuff do not like to hear that you've been playing it on YouTube for a year.

00:41:06.728 --> 00:41:25.199
So another thing which I know you're very keen on is you know, you like to push the role of the harmonica in the band, you know, not just have it as a kind of soloist kind of instrument, but, you know, trying to put layers in and have rhythmical stuff, you know, partly using the effects you're playing, partly using, you know, your approach to playing the harmonica as well.

00:41:25.478 --> 00:41:26.739
Yes, absolutely.

00:41:26.920 --> 00:41:36.128
I get a certain amount of static about that from some musicians who aren't used to hearing a harmonica playing a more central role in the band.

00:41:36.588 --> 00:41:38.610
But, you know, I think back to Magic Dick.

00:41:39.010 --> 00:41:46.097
One of the innovations of the Jay Giles Band was that they put the harmonica right into the rhythm section.

00:41:46.458 --> 00:41:51.784
I talked to Seth Just, the keyboard player for that band, and he said, yeah, we knew we were doing that.

00:41:52.023 --> 00:41:54.106
It was a new role for the harmonica.

00:41:54.166 --> 00:42:01.193
Instead of just cruising above the band, the harmonica was in the rhythm section, driving the rhythm section.

00:42:01.554 --> 00:42:04.056
That was a new role, and it impressed me.

00:42:04.376 --> 00:42:13.447
You know, in order to keep harmonica players, including myself, employed, I think it's a explore new roles for the instrument in the band.

00:42:13.806 --> 00:42:18.512
Yeah, I think it's interesting because obviously as harmonica players, in many ways, we're told not to overplay.

00:42:19.193 --> 00:42:25.360
We're kind of scared of overplaying because then you're playing over the singer and it gets a bad name for the harmonica.

00:42:25.420 --> 00:42:31.706
So how do you approach it in a way that you're not seen as overplaying and playing all over the singer and that sort of thing?

00:42:31.947 --> 00:42:37.833
You pay very careful attention to where in the music the harmonica is fitting.

00:42:38.213 --> 00:42:41.518
Like, for example, if you're playing an organ part, That's cool.

00:42:41.938 --> 00:42:47.028
Are you playing it in a register where it's not conflicting with the singer and the guitarist?

00:42:47.449 --> 00:42:50.356
I talked about foreground and background before.

00:42:50.876 --> 00:42:52.920
And the first rule of background is...

00:42:53.442 --> 00:42:58.005
reinforce what the other players are doing, don't stick out in front of the band.

00:42:58.525 --> 00:43:07.713
One of the ways to approach playing accompaniment is to lock on to something that another one of the players is doing, like the bass line or a rhythm guitar part.

00:43:08.414 --> 00:43:18.224
Another way is to listen for a place where there's enough space in the music for you to put an accompaniment part.

00:43:18.704 --> 00:43:23.248
This is where having a multi-effects device or a set of pedals really helps.

00:43:23.407 --> 00:43:34.719
Because it's much more exciting for everybody if when you're doing these accompaniment parts, you can switch up the sound of the harmonica so it doesn't all sound like a harmonica playing accompaniment.

00:43:34.980 --> 00:43:38.268
So is it quite heavily based on the effects you're using when you approach it this way?

00:43:38.722 --> 00:43:47.208
It's more based on what I can play and how the effects change the perception of what I'm playing for the audience.

00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:49.311
I mean, I play in certain ways.

00:43:49.371 --> 00:43:58.518
When I'm using an envelope filter, for example, you know, a waka-waka box, the first thing I'm thinking is, what's the rhythmic pattern I want to play on the harmonica?

00:43:58.699 --> 00:44:03.202
And the second thing I'm thinking is, how do I want this waka-waka thing to cut through?

00:44:03.242 --> 00:44:07.527
So another big thing that you're known for is writing the book Jazz Harp.

00:44:07.706 --> 00:44:08.688
What year did you write it?

00:44:08.688 --> 00:44:09.168
I

00:44:09.309 --> 00:44:14.353
wrote it in 1979, and it was published, I think, in November of 1980.

00:44:14.434 --> 00:44:14.634
I

00:44:15.195 --> 00:44:18.217
did own this book when I was younger, and I think a lot of harmonica players did.

00:44:18.297 --> 00:44:19.278
So yeah, it was a great book.

00:44:19.338 --> 00:44:24.684
And basically, it was a book of transcriptions of, well, some of it was harmonica, but some of it was other instruments as well, right?

00:44:24.724 --> 00:44:29.188
And it was some jazz transcriptions, but also some sort of rock as well, yeah?

00:44:29.208 --> 00:44:31.030
So it was a combination of jazz and rock.

00:44:31.371 --> 00:44:42.340
So I think initially, you'd written this as a book called Harmonica for Musicians, and it was much longer, and you had to sort of cut it down to what was the collection of transcriptions, which is what it came out as.

00:44:42.601 --> 00:44:42.922
Yeah.

00:44:43.262 --> 00:44:59.036
I went to visit the publisher, Jason Shulman, at Oak Publications in New York, and Harmonica for Musicians was like, I was inspired by Paul Hindemith's Basic Training for Musicians, which is a very fierce book.

00:44:59.195 --> 00:45:00.516
Basic, yeah, right.

00:45:00.856 --> 00:45:07.628
Anyhow, Harmonica for Musicians was a couple of hundred pages long and had a very stern tone to it.

00:45:07.668 --> 00:45:10.014
You know, do this, do that, do the other thing.

00:45:10.454 --> 00:45:18.893
I went to visit the publisher with my wife and Jason Shulman said, well, we don't want this book, but we think you could write the book we want you to write.

00:45:19.266 --> 00:45:21.668
And I was all set to say, well, stuff it, man.

00:45:22.329 --> 00:45:26.932
And my wife said to me, my wife said, oh, Richard, isn't that wonderful?

00:45:27.572 --> 00:45:30.175
And I said, oh, oh, yeah, yeah.

00:45:30.235 --> 00:45:33.398
That's, you know, that's the best thing since Swiss cheese.

00:45:33.557 --> 00:45:33.838
Sure.

00:45:33.878 --> 00:45:37.202
So I ended up writing a much shorter book.

00:45:37.742 --> 00:45:41.724
And as Jason Shulman kept telling me, a friendlier book.

00:45:41.985 --> 00:45:45.489
And I think at that time, you know, transcriptions weren't that common, right?

00:45:45.628 --> 00:45:48.952
It's one of the sort of first transcriptions which was coming out for harmonica.

00:45:49.012 --> 00:45:49.231
Yes.

00:45:49.231 --> 00:45:55.778
I did the transcriptions in standard notation and in arrow notation.

00:45:56.161 --> 00:45:58.108
You know, I think that was a good thing to do.

00:45:58.657 --> 00:46:03.521
But really, I think that harmonica players should try to learn to read music.

00:46:03.882 --> 00:46:12.409
You know, it helps a lot if you plan to make your fortune as a studio musician or even playing with an orchestra.

00:46:12.869 --> 00:46:18.936
Not that a whole lot of harmonica players are into that, but I'm thinking of Philippe Achille and some of the other modern players.

00:46:19.536 --> 00:46:24.159
The parts that they throw at harmonica players are very rarely difficult parts.

00:46:24.601 --> 00:46:26.943
But if you can't read music, you don't find that out.

00:46:27.583 --> 00:46:28.284
Absolutely, yeah.

00:46:28.603 --> 00:46:29.545
I And it was a great book.

00:46:29.585 --> 00:46:32.728
Yeah, I mean, as I say, I think a lot of harmonica players own that book then.

00:46:32.788 --> 00:46:34.530
So you sold quite a few of these, did you?

00:46:34.610 --> 00:46:36.231
Did it make you a little bit of money at least?

00:46:36.532 --> 00:46:38.494
It made me a little bit of money.

00:46:38.655 --> 00:46:41.197
Let me be clear about this.

00:46:41.818 --> 00:46:51.568
Books for audiences like harmonica players who do not number astronomically don't make you a lot of money, but they do help you establish a reputation.

00:46:51.929 --> 00:46:53.451
And it's a great thing you got down there as well.

00:46:53.490 --> 00:46:56.954
As I say, I certainly knew who you were back when I was a teenager and got that book.

00:46:57.014 --> 00:46:57.594
So great.

00:46:57.875 --> 00:47:00.237
So talk Talking about chromatic harmonica then.

00:47:00.257 --> 00:47:01.719
So you do play some chromatic harmonica.

00:47:01.739 --> 00:47:06.742
I think the first one you recorded was In a Sentimental Mood, which is a beautiful Duke Ellington song.

00:47:07.063 --> 00:47:07.965
My favorite song.

00:47:24.679 --> 00:47:26.862
Was that the first song you recorded on chromatic?

00:47:27.297 --> 00:47:28.579
I guess it was.

00:47:28.619 --> 00:47:31.483
It was my first full-blown release.

00:47:31.784 --> 00:47:35.989
I didn't use chromatic on any of the singles I released in Boston.

00:47:36.231 --> 00:47:38.853
I played a lot more chromatic than I recorded.

00:47:39.155 --> 00:47:46.726
I had done a series of classical pieces with a trio in Falmouth, Massachusetts when I was living there.

00:47:47.126 --> 00:47:49.329
And I studied jazz on the chromatic.

00:47:49.769 --> 00:47:53.695
It's not something that I record or perform with frequently.

00:47:53.916 --> 00:47:55.197
I mean, I do know how.

00:47:55.458 --> 00:47:57.967
But I don't do it all that frequently.

00:47:58.007 --> 00:48:01.157
The diatonic just seems to suit my temperament better.

00:48:01.518 --> 00:48:05.532
Yeah, but you've got a song I think played on chromatic on your Lucky One album, Vivid.

00:48:21.634 --> 00:48:24.958
Oh yeah, vivid is played on the chromatic, but so is deeper.

00:48:24.998 --> 00:48:27.983
Deeper is a nice ballad, vivid is a nice ballad.

00:48:28.423 --> 00:48:31.949
You know, if you want to make them cry, play it on a chromatic.

00:48:32.429 --> 00:48:32.951
Yeah, definitely.

00:48:32.971 --> 00:48:36.556
It suits the ballads, doesn't it, so well, the chromatic, those nice slow ballads.

00:48:37.297 --> 00:48:42.324
So a question I ask each time, Richard, is if you had 10 minutes to practice, what would you spend those 10 minutes doing?

00:48:42.945 --> 00:48:50.755
I tend to focus on one technical element in my playing that I want to improve, and I'll practice that for 10 minutes.

00:48:50.875 --> 00:48:55.079
And I do that, you know, I do 10 minutes of practice fairly frequently.

00:48:55.119 --> 00:48:57.222
You know, it's amazing.

00:48:57.362 --> 00:49:01.347
If you do 10 minutes of practice six times a day, you've got an hour of practice in.

00:49:01.847 --> 00:49:15.081
So the first thing I would do is tend to focus on a particular technical issue, maybe a breathing issue or a movement issue in a particular passage, or the head for Little Walter's Juke.

00:49:15.380 --> 00:49:17.443
And I just practiced that for 10 minutes.

00:49:18.003 --> 00:49:28.552
And then as I moved through the day, as I got more opportunities to put in 10 minutes, I might work on a piece of old repertoire, something I've been playing for a while.

00:49:28.572 --> 00:49:35.018
And then I'll spend 10 minutes working on a new piece of repertoire and so on and so forth.

00:49:35.318 --> 00:49:39.963
So take those 10 minute chunks and focus on one thing during each chunk.

00:49:40.402 --> 00:49:44.208
So we'll move on to the last section First of all, about the harmonicas that you play.

00:49:44.289 --> 00:49:49.920
So I noticed looking through all this wealth of information you provide that you pretty much seem to play every harmonica going.

00:49:49.980 --> 00:49:54.648
Is that that's clearly an approach that you've taken that you wanted to try them all out and record with them all?

00:49:55.068 --> 00:50:01.661
Yeah, I feel like for my own purposes, I want to know which harmonicas work really well with my playing.

00:50:02.018 --> 00:50:04.440
I want to know how they compare to the competition.

00:50:04.619 --> 00:50:07.141
And I like to share that information with people as well.

00:50:07.603 --> 00:50:11.346
Right now, I'm very impressed by DeBell Noble harmonicas.

00:50:12.327 --> 00:50:14.248
They're really good value for money.

00:50:14.349 --> 00:50:20.293
They seem to hold up really well, and they come out of the box playing very nicely.

00:50:21.014 --> 00:50:23.315
I'm also a fan of Seidel harmonicas.

00:50:23.396 --> 00:50:25.918
Some of the best instruments in my kit are Seidels.

00:50:26.358 --> 00:50:36.190
I'm not as crazy about Hohner harmonicas as a lot of players are, but, you know, maybe there's something about honers and blues that really goes together.

00:50:36.250 --> 00:50:40.376
And most of the well-known players out there are essentially focused on blues.

00:50:40.817 --> 00:50:48.108
In my case, blues is about 25% of my repertoire, although everything I do is influenced by blues.

00:50:48.688 --> 00:50:50.371
And I do have just about everything.

00:50:50.431 --> 00:50:51.413
I've got mangies.

00:50:51.492 --> 00:50:52.474
I've got the bells.

00:50:52.594 --> 00:50:53.556
I've got honers.

00:50:54.317 --> 00:50:56.521
I've got Brendan Power, Lucky 13s.

00:50:56.641 --> 00:50:57.481
I like them a lot.

00:50:57.742 --> 00:50:59.945
You know, I've got a bunch of different stuff.

00:51:00.226 --> 00:51:01.146
Yeah, no, great.

00:51:01.166 --> 00:51:01.407
Yeah.

00:51:01.487 --> 00:51:03.250
So like you say, it's great to try them all.

00:51:03.369 --> 00:51:05.974
So, I mean, we've talked about tunings a lot already.

00:51:06.014 --> 00:51:08.456
So clearly you use a whole host of different tunings.

00:51:08.476 --> 00:51:12.943
I mean, you know, you're still buying bought tunings or do you do some retuning yourself as well?

00:51:13.483 --> 00:51:15.626
I do a little bit of retuning myself.

00:51:15.766 --> 00:51:28.262
If I'm making a Dorian harmonica, I will retune the two reeds that have to be retuned by myself, mainly because all I have to do is put a little bit of blue tack on each of two reeds and I've got the tuning.

00:51:30.126 --> 00:51:30.206
Yeah.

00:51:39.554 --> 00:51:43.077
But otherwise, I use country harps.

00:51:43.197 --> 00:51:44.958
You can buy them out of the box.

00:51:45.679 --> 00:51:47.340
I use natural minors.

00:51:47.481 --> 00:51:48.581
They're out of the box.

00:51:48.802 --> 00:51:50.003
I use melody makers.

00:51:50.043 --> 00:51:51.184
They're out of the box.

00:51:51.684 --> 00:51:52.925
I use standard tunings.

00:51:52.985 --> 00:51:53.905
They're out of the box.

00:51:54.306 --> 00:52:03.255
I even make some extreme tunings, like combining the draw plate from a standard harmonica with the blow plate from a harmonic minor.

00:52:03.914 --> 00:52:06.077
Not harmonic minor, natural minor.

00:52:06.336 --> 00:52:09.519
That's a really cool harmonica for certain types of chords.

00:52:09.519 --> 00:52:17.286
progressions but in general yeah if I can buy it I'll buy it you know I don't want to have to spend three hours tuning a harmonica

00:52:17.666 --> 00:52:30.157
you know how do you find switching between the different tunings I mean personally when I do it you know I kind of find that they work for a particular song and I know how to play that song on the tuning is that how you approach it yourself or are you just familiar with them enough

00:52:30.418 --> 00:52:39.862
well the first thing I do is figure out what kind of scale I need for the song because that's going to that's going to choose the tuning for me in general.

00:52:39.963 --> 00:52:41.804
I mean, I still have a number of choices.

00:52:41.844 --> 00:52:50.112
If I'm going to play in a Dorian minor, for example, I could use one of my Dorian minor harps that gives you that scale in second position.

00:52:50.811 --> 00:52:55.076
Or I could use first position on a natural minor.

00:52:55.596 --> 00:53:01.481
But the first thing is to understand what scale or scales I'm going to need.

00:53:01.501 --> 00:53:04.184
And then I'll choose the harmonica based on that.

00:53:04.403 --> 00:53:06.146
Do I have a lot of trouble switching?

00:53:06.465 --> 00:53:07.186
Not so much.

00:53:07.686 --> 00:53:09.789
I don't use really rat Yeah.

00:53:38.960 --> 00:53:39.302
Yeah.

00:53:39.342 --> 00:53:39.784
And

00:53:41.291 --> 00:53:42.275
what about using

00:53:42.315 --> 00:53:43.280
overblows?

00:53:43.922 --> 00:53:44.425
I use them.

00:53:44.769 --> 00:53:50.380
You know, I don't have harps that are set up specifically for overblowing, but I do use overblows.

00:53:50.780 --> 00:53:56.751
Some of the runs I do on diatonics are absolutely built around the overblows in those runs.

00:53:57.132 --> 00:53:59.536
If I was better at overblowing, I'd do more of it.

00:53:59.735 --> 00:54:09.474
But generally speaking, I prefer to start with a harp that's got a scale that's going to work on the tune as opposed to counting on overblowing to fill in all the gaps.

00:54:09.858 --> 00:54:10.137
Yeah.

00:54:10.277 --> 00:54:11.338
And what about your embouchure?

00:54:11.358 --> 00:54:13.320
Are you tongue blocking, puckering, anything else?

00:54:13.760 --> 00:54:16.364
For single note runs, I use puckers as a rule.

00:54:16.583 --> 00:54:24.570
You can obviously tell from the stuff on the act of being free and the second act of free being that I use a lot of split tongue on the solo pieces.

00:54:25.090 --> 00:54:31.677
I'm not so much using it for the Chicago slap type thing as I'm using it for counterpoint.

00:54:32.177 --> 00:54:48.648
So when I try to do the tongue blocking thing for blues, I can do it, but I keep trying it compared to my pucker thing that I'm very familiar with and I find the pucker to be more useful for me and to sound pretty much the same.

00:54:49.121 --> 00:54:55.827
You could probably tell if you listened to two minutes of my stuff whether I was using a pucker or a block, but I don't think it would be easy.

00:54:56.208 --> 00:55:02.954
Yeah, and equipment-wise, obviously we've talked about, you know, you use the Digitech pedals and the Line 6 and the Thunder Mustang arm.

00:55:03.213 --> 00:55:04.414
So what about microphones?

00:55:04.454 --> 00:55:09.420
Again, I think from reading through your blogs, et cetera, you seem to use quite a host of microphones as well.

00:55:09.940 --> 00:55:10.000
I

00:55:10.099 --> 00:55:10.561
use a few

00:55:10.601 --> 00:55:11.240
different mics.

00:55:11.621 --> 00:55:16.385
I use the Audix Fireball V with the Digitech RP500.

00:55:16.806 --> 00:55:19.387
They seem to be just really well suited to each other.

00:55:19.668 --> 00:55:24.032
And I use a bulletini mic for anything that's supposed to be bluesier.

00:55:24.152 --> 00:55:27.657
And in particular, I have it plugged into the 9-6 Helix.

00:55:27.876 --> 00:55:30.900
But I've also used it with the Mustang, and I like that a lot.

00:55:31.161 --> 00:55:34.724
I had a Silverfish Silver Bullet, and I liked it for blues.

00:55:34.864 --> 00:55:38.108
It was a little bit screechier than the bulletini.

00:55:38.208 --> 00:55:40.030
I don't mean more feedback prone.

00:55:40.431 --> 00:55:44.394
I mean, it had a little bit of more upper middle frequencies in it.

00:55:44.755 --> 00:55:47.117
And I liked it a lot, and I lost it.

00:55:47.838 --> 00:55:47.938
Great.

00:55:47.958 --> 00:55:49.039
And sometimes you use a wireless mic.

00:55:49.039 --> 00:55:49.260
Oh,

00:55:49.380 --> 00:55:52.764
well, I use all my mics wirelessly now.

00:55:53.246 --> 00:55:58.652
Every time I plug one back into a cable, I'm reminded of how often I used to step on cables.

00:55:59.934 --> 00:56:03.418
The wireless setup doesn't change the sound of the mic.

00:56:03.920 --> 00:56:08.585
It just means that you don't have a cable running from the mic to whatever you're using to amplify it.

00:56:09.730 --> 00:56:12.914
No, you don't find there's any delay in getting the signal out.

00:56:13.054 --> 00:56:15.097
It's immediate, is it, the response?

00:56:15.197 --> 00:56:16.380
Not audible delay.

00:56:16.420 --> 00:56:23.050
To me, that means that if there's a delay, it's in the neighborhood of five milliseconds, give or take.

00:56:24.211 --> 00:56:25.032
And that's nothing.

00:56:25.273 --> 00:56:29.980
Five milliseconds is the equivalent of somebody playing five feet away from you.

00:56:31.041 --> 00:56:33.746
So that's not a noticeable delay in the sound.

00:56:34.530 --> 00:56:42.018
And again, talking about your setup, you've got lots of information on your website and there's blogs around the different rigs that you use.

00:56:42.079 --> 00:56:43.885
And you also use this, is it...

00:56:44.097 --> 00:56:45.599
Is it Joyo?

00:56:45.759 --> 00:56:48.202
The Joyo American Sound, yeah.

00:56:48.422 --> 00:56:54.246
I have a lightweight pedal setup that I take to pick up gigs and to jam sessions.

00:56:54.726 --> 00:56:56.628
And that has six devices on it.

00:56:56.748 --> 00:57:06.297
A pitch shifter, a delay, the Joyo, a vibrato, an envelope filter, and a reverb, which I consider the basic food groups for harmonica.

00:57:06.516 --> 00:57:09.699
And the Joyo is what makes the amp sound in that setup.

00:57:09.760 --> 00:57:12.603
And I think it's a perfectly usable pedal for 40 bucks.

00:57:13.023 --> 00:57:17.190
So you're using these pedals in instead of the sort of multi-effects units like the Digitech?

00:57:17.670 --> 00:57:20.597
Well, yeah, you know, I like to experiment with different gear.

00:57:20.617 --> 00:57:27.650
I happen to have a few pedals lying around of various vintages, and I thought, let's put it together on a board and see what it sounds like.

00:57:27.751 --> 00:57:33.141
And it sounds good, and it's easy to pick up and transport, and I take it to a lot of gigs.

00:57:33.442 --> 00:57:43.050
Yeah, no, it's great being so

00:57:48.394 --> 00:58:00.666
portable, isn't it?

00:58:03.407 --> 00:58:04.893
playing harmonica over them.

00:58:05.215 --> 00:58:08.125
So that's what I'm thinking of for performance going forward.

00:58:08.485 --> 00:58:11.557
And of course I can bring other musicians into that mix if I like.

00:58:11.938 --> 00:58:16.545
I don't have any plans to travel in the immediate future, but we'll see how it goes.

00:58:16.626 --> 00:58:26.023
We'll see how the original solo stuff plays with audiences in various venues, and depending on how well it plays, I might very well get out there on the road.

00:58:26.503 --> 00:58:26.905
Sure, yeah.

00:58:26.925 --> 00:58:32.735
And so if people do want to check you out, you're playing around your local area now, which is, again, the northeast of the U.S., yeah?

00:58:32.974 --> 00:58:36.561
Northeast Connecticut, specifically Fairfield County, Connecticut.

00:58:36.994 --> 00:58:37.614
Great.

00:58:37.675 --> 00:58:40.902
So people can find you playing around the area there, can they?

00:58:41.443 --> 00:58:41.983
Absolutely.

00:58:42.664 --> 00:58:43.206
Yeah, brilliant.

00:58:43.226 --> 00:58:45.451
So check you out and check out your great website.

00:58:45.811 --> 00:58:48.175
Yeah, so thanks so much for joining me today, Richard Hunter.

00:58:48.516 --> 00:58:49.197
My pleasure.

00:58:49.237 --> 00:58:50.280
Thanks for having me.

00:58:50.981 --> 00:58:53.065
Thanks to Zydle for sponsoring the podcast.

00:58:53.346 --> 00:59:02.903
And be sure to check out the great range of harmonicas and products at www.zidel1847.com or on Facebook or Instagram at Zidel Harmonicas.

00:59:03.304 --> 00:59:05.349
Thanks so much for Richard for joining me today.

00:59:05.409 --> 00:59:07.833
What great innovations he's brought to the harmonica.

00:59:08.153 --> 00:59:09.777
Be sure to check out his recordings.

00:59:10.402 --> 00:59:11.724
Thanks so much for listening again.

00:59:11.764 --> 00:59:21.117
Remember to check out the podcast website on monicahappyhour.com and if you occur to make a donation to help with the running cost of the podcast then you can do so there.

00:59:21.157 --> 00:59:29.949
I'll leave you now with Richard playing a song from his Blue Future album Mercy, Mercy, Mercy Me.

00:59:46.818 --> 00:59:47.230
Thank you.